R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006) Cooper (R50) and Cooper S (R53) hatchback discussion.

R50/53 Why shouldn't I buy an '04 MCS instead of '05-06?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 02:37 PM
  #1  
ksminiman's Avatar
ksminiman
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 203
Likes: 2
From: Charleston, SC
Why shouldn't I buy an '04 MCS instead of '05-06?

Heres the story. I have been watching on autotrader some minis and have fallen in love with an '04 MCS. I am looking for under 40K miles and specific options. Sport pkg, Premium pkg, and Cold weather pkg. I would rather get an 05-06 car due to some of the things ive read however I see so many 02-04 minis around. This 04 mini is exactly what I am looking for (given it is in good shape when I inspect it) except the year. I have searched on here for months finding all the differences between them however I am wondering how much they really amount to. I plan on installing a 15% underdrive SC pulley and some sort of suspension plates and leaving it alone from there. (for a while )

My question. Why shouldnt I buy an 04 Mini? I am looking for good reenforced opinions as to why I should get an 05-06 instead. I have an 05 in mind already however it is further away and costs more for the same options and miles.

Thank you all
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 02:49 PM
  #2  
JAB 67's Avatar
JAB 67
6th Gear
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 60
From: Fairfax, VA
I have an '04 MCS with 6-spd/sport/premium/cold. What I don't like, and which I believe changed in '05 or '06, are the gear ratios (in particular, going from 1st to 2nd), and the composition of the throw-out bearing and the guide sleeve along which it travels.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 03:10 PM
  #3  
STLMINI's Avatar
STLMINI
6th Gear
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis
Horsepower boost and, like the J A Blazer said, gearing. But if performance isn't your thing, I don't see any reason to not get the 04.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 04:33 PM
  #4  
buzzsaw's Avatar
buzzsaw
6th Gear
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 46
Check out the auto reviews of all the years of Mini models on this link. It's got a lot of info that may help.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 06:40 PM
  #5  
ksminiman's Avatar
ksminiman
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 203
Likes: 2
From: Charleston, SC
Is this what your were talking about?

<http://www.motoringfile.com/mini-r50r53-buyers-guide>

I have read it many times. It has very valuable info. I dont think I am really missing anything as far as differences. I am really curious about the reliability and drivability differences between them. even small convenience differences that people have noticed.

I love the answers please keep them coming. I have done extensive research on the actual cars but am really looking for individual opinions about the differences

thank you
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 06:48 PM
  #6  
ScottRiqui's Avatar
ScottRiqui
OVERDRIVE
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 8
From: Norfolk, VA
You could also get a Limited-Slip Differential as a factory option starting in 2006 - something that wasn't an option on the earlier cars.

I think the biggest day-to-day difference is the revised gear ratios for the later cars. I have some friends with an earlier JCW MINI and a 2006 'S' (not a JCW). According to them, the later 'S' feels as quick and "peppy" accelerating away from a stop as the earlier JCW, even though it has less horsepower.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 06:57 PM
  #7  
IrishCooper's Avatar
IrishCooper
5th Gear
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 19
From: Bedford, TX.
For me its more about the cosmetic difference than the gearing and such, although all that can be changed out for a price. But that goes for any of it even the tranny. I just like the 05-06 headlights and such and the minor things in the interior that set it apart.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #8  
ScottRiqui's Avatar
ScottRiqui
OVERDRIVE
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 8
From: Norfolk, VA
Originally Posted by IrishCooper
For me its more about the cosmetic difference than the gearing and such, although all that can be changed out for a price. But that goes for any of it even the tranny. I just like the 05-06 headlights and such and the minor things in the interior that set it apart.
Same for me - I really like the later three-piece dash compared to the older five-piece version. Unfortunately, both of our MINIs are '06 convertibles, so while there are a lot of differences between our cars and the earlier cars, I don't know which differences are because we have convertibles and not coupes, and which differences were the result of the 2005 "facelift".
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2009 | 11:18 PM
  #9  
Monk Edsel's Avatar
Monk Edsel
4th Gear
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
For me it's also cosmetic... I have to say, I like the reverse light being in the bumper of the older cars, as opposed to the black plastic filler piece that are in most of the newer bumpers, since only, like, 3 people opted for the rear fog light to take its place. I also prefer the older-style tail lights... they are much truer to the original car, and more substantial looking with the turn signal floating in the center... although I DO wish it were a white lens instead of amber.
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 10:46 AM
  #10  
ksminiman's Avatar
ksminiman
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 203
Likes: 2
From: Charleston, SC
You guys(and gals if applies) are awesome. thank you for the quick responses. Im pretty sure it will be an 06 will be the final choice
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 12:49 PM
  #11  
minirooferS's Avatar
minirooferS
4th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
What exactly is the "face lift" in 2005? I know they changed the headlights and tail lights, but is there anything else?
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 01:04 PM
  #12  
ScottRiqui's Avatar
ScottRiqui
OVERDRIVE
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 8
From: Norfolk, VA
I don't know all of the changes, but they included taillights, headlights, a new three-slat front grille, and a change from the five-piece dash to the three-piece dash. The Cooper also got new front & rear bumpers.

There were also engine/transmission changes, such as the revised gear ratios in the six-speed. The superchargers were internally-coated for tighter tolerances. (basically, the old JCW supercharger became the new standard supercharger).

For the suspension, MINI added a small amount of rear camber adjustment.

I'm sure others will chime in with more of the changes.
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 03:02 PM
  #13  
ksminiman's Avatar
ksminiman
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 203
Likes: 2
From: Charleston, SC
the tray between the front seats under the hand brake. the keys are charged through the ignition instead of using a normal battery, chrono package available, limited slip available through factory, cooper gets a 5-speed getrag instead of the old BMW unit that was prone to failure. the CVT is dropped for a conventional automatic with push button shift, further revised coolant tank, addition of extra notches on upper front strut mounts (dont know if that was intended for strengthening or not), only 3 spoke steering wheel available and revised smarter airbags. new wheel options available, new interior surface options (lounge leather! ) reverse light moved from lower bumper to into rear taillight assemblies and replaced by optional fog light. smooth grill surround on front (old has ridge) introduced the convertible and automatic trans now available on MCS.

I think that sums it up. as you can see ive done extensive research on this to try and see if a few extra thousand was worth getting the revised MK I MINI. I have decided yes it will be in the long run. better reliability and driveability reign supreme.
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 11:21 AM
  #14  
buzzsaw's Avatar
buzzsaw
6th Gear
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 46
Originally Posted by minirooferS
What exactly is the "face lift" in 2005? I know they changed the headlights and tail lights, but is there anything else?
Here is a link that may answer your question about the midlife face lift.
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #15  
Tsiggy's Avatar
Tsiggy
Alliance Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 80
Likes: 16
From: Jacksonville, Oregon
05' S

Some of the things stated already mattered to me as well. I like the gear ratio in my '05 but wish I had even smoother 1st to 2nd ....high revs in first to find 2nds power range. The headlights w/washers are nice. The '02-'04 backup light was something I wanted so I added it with the Minspeed Kit...easy. Probaly the downside would be the leaking fluid filled engine mounts that have been replaced once since it was new. Some of the problems I read about are with engine and clutch in earlier models and that is something I would hope to see less of. I expect to throw some money at an '05 engine/power train anyway though. Hope this helps.
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 04:54 PM
  #16  
jtucker's Avatar
jtucker
1st Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
I bought an '04 MCS...

And I am pretty happy with it. I have pretty much everything except the NAV. Sport, premium, cold weather, HK, back up assist, etc. i got it used, and the miles were low, condition good, and I liked the color combo, Indi Blue w/ black. For me the gear ratios seem prety good from 1-4, 5 and 6 seem a little close in my opinion. I don't see any reason to not buy an '04 if the deal is right.

Judst my $0.02...


J. Tucker
'04 MCS
"92 C2 Coupe
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 11:23 AM
  #17  
ksminiman's Avatar
ksminiman
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 203
Likes: 2
From: Charleston, SC
thank you all. this thread is very helpful. I drove an 04 and an 06 back to back over the weekend. I am finding myself liking the 04. I like the longer gear ratio for highway use. I like the 2 spoke steering wheel for some reason. I cant figure out why. It felt nice in my hands. The 04 I drove was a little worse for wear but did not rattle or squeak even on the horrible IL roads and highways. I see no difference with the 5 piece dash vs 3 piece as far as quietness. granted I dont drive a mini everyday... yet. I also like the fact that the 04 had the amber rear turn signals where as the 06 has red. on such a small car I want every light to be as bright as possible so all the idiots have a better chance of noticing. I dont really mind the difference in the headlights. As long as it has the HID low beams that is all that matters to me. all in all it is still a very hard decision between the 2. all opinions wanted as anything can potentially be valuable.
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 03:50 AM
  #18  
msjulie33's Avatar
msjulie33
4th Gear
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 317
Likes: 3
From: 95030
Originally Posted by Monk Edsel
For me it's also cosmetic... I have to say, I like the reverse light being in the bumper of the older cars, as opposed to the black plastic filler piece that are in most of the newer bumpers, since only, like, 3 people opted for the rear fog light to take its place. I also prefer the older-style tail lights... they are much truer to the original car, and more substantial looking with the turn signal floating in the center... although I DO wish it were a white lens instead of amber.
I didn't know I was one of 3! That rear fog is great for backing off tailgating SUVs...
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 03:55 AM
  #19  
NightFlyR's Avatar
NightFlyR
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: NJ
I also have an 04, Indie Blue with black, I have the sports package, nav, Hot weather package, rear fog lights. I have the build sheet who ever was the original owner pretty much put everything into this car, I purchased this car use with 21K on it a year ago. I have had a few issues with the Suspension and other minor things, it does have a few small rattles but overall I realy like the car.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 09:12 AM
  #20  
ksminiman's Avatar
ksminiman
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 203
Likes: 2
From: Charleston, SC
JRoca can you elaborate on your issues with your car? Im trying to get a feel for the average definition of "small issues" on this board.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 04:04 PM
  #21  
NightFlyR's Avatar
NightFlyR
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: NJ
I had a right rear suspension failure, also had to change 1 of the front drive axles as it was making a noise like 2 pool ***** hitting.
Other then the crater of a whole that I hit in january the car has been excellent, I have put almost 30K on it in a year, including a few trips of 800 plus miles and a very ulgy winter on very unplowed roads.
I have owned more then 25 cars, and I have to say this ranks right up there in the top 5 and I plan on holding on to it for at least another year or so.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2009 | 08:09 AM
  #22  
u68423's Avatar
u68423
3rd Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 187
Likes: 1
From: Orange county NY
I have an 05 PS and love it. Given all the factory upgrades 04 vs 05 I choose to go that route, I also love the look of the headlights. Most of the things you liked about the 04 vs the 05 amber lighting etc.. can be modified on an 05 for very little cash except the 2 spoke wheel. If you weigh your options the old JCW supercharger used on the 05 S alone is worth $2500.00 al the older ones have a much higher failure rate. my 02cents
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DiGiPiMP
F55/F56 :: Hatch Talk (2014+)
3
Aug 24, 2015 11:04 AM
ShadyCoop
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
14
Aug 24, 2015 06:05 AM
elightbo
1st Gear
13
Aug 17, 2015 01:50 PM
nomar116
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
6
Aug 10, 2015 11:24 PM
tag1260
MINI Parts for Sale
4
Aug 10, 2015 10:41 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:44 PM.