Suspension What would a front sway bar do for my car?
What would a front sway bar do for my car?
When used in conjunction with a rear anti sway bar, what are the benefits, if any, of also putting on a front anti sway bar. Most of the posts I read talk about putting a rear anti sway bar to reduce understeer. Wouldn't adding a front bar bring that back?
Also, as I am not a racer, what do camber plates do and how do they work?
Thanks
Also, as I am not a racer, what do camber plates do and how do they work?
Thanks
If your gonna putt-putt the car around town...not much. It's a beotch to put on.
I had mine set on stiff and it kept wanting to slide me into curbs.
I repostitioned it to the only other setting and the combo works great for me.
I had mine set on stiff and it kept wanting to slide me into curbs.
I repostitioned it to the only other setting and the combo works great for me.
We have f/r anti-sway bars from the factory. Adding a stiffer RSB will help reduce understeer. Adding a stiffer FSB will increase understeer as you say. So don't go there. I've even heard of people putting a Cooper (smaller diameter) FSB to help reduce understeer.
The front camber plates also work to reduce understeer be tilting the top of the wheels inward a degree or two (negative camber). This will increase the contact patch for the outside front tire in a hard turn, yielding more grip for that tire.
You really don't need any of this unless you drive really hard. If there's a nice curve in your area you can try to push your car through it harder than usual to see/feel when the car starts transition to an understeer condition (be careful) if you feel you don't need to go that fast then you probably shouldn't worry about suspension mods. An MCS does pretty well with the stock setup.
The front camber plates also work to reduce understeer be tilting the top of the wheels inward a degree or two (negative camber). This will increase the contact patch for the outside front tire in a hard turn, yielding more grip for that tire.
You really don't need any of this unless you drive really hard. If there's a nice curve in your area you can try to push your car through it harder than usual to see/feel when the car starts transition to an understeer condition (be careful) if you feel you don't need to go that fast then you probably shouldn't worry about suspension mods. An MCS does pretty well with the stock setup.
Last edited by chuckt; Jun 15, 2007 at 09:20 AM.
From Randy Webb's website:
I only recommend doing the rear swaybar. The purpose behind the rear swaybar is to dial out the inherent understeer, which most new cars are programmed with. Why? Because if you enter a turn too hot, the car goes straight when you turn the wheel - the tendency then is to lift the throttle, which transfers more weight to the front and gives more coefficient of friction to the front contact patch, letting the car turn in. It isn't the fastest way through a turn, and it certainly isn't the most fun way through a turn. That's where the rear bar comes in. Thinking on a twisting body model, if you apply force to the outside, or loaded wheel, and you have a stiffer rear bar, it will do two things: first, it will lift the inside rear wheel, reducing the rear coefficient of friction, and second, it will transfer load diagonally to the inside front wheel. This makes the car neutral. It has a secondary benefit of acting like a cheap limited slip differential if the unloaded front wheel is the power driven wheel.
I'm trying a slightly different approach. Way (Way Motorworks) just put an H-Sport front swaybar on my car. I'm hoping to be able to soften the front damper settings a touch to improve front grip in sweepers, but not loose as much transient response as I did with the stock front swaybar when the dampers were at that setting.
Of course that is all focused around autocross performance. On the street it was fine before, and with the slightly larger front swaybar it feels even flatter with the same relatively soft damper settings I use for daily driving.
I won't know if this line of thought pays off until I've had a chance to run the car at a couple of different events at different sites (some sites favor sweepers more, others are more transient intensive). That starts next weekend.
Scott
90SM
Of course that is all focused around autocross performance. On the street it was fine before, and with the slightly larger front swaybar it feels even flatter with the same relatively soft damper settings I use for daily driving.
I won't know if this line of thought pays off until I've had a chance to run the car at a couple of different events at different sites (some sites favor sweepers more, others are more transient intensive). That starts next weekend.
Scott
90SM
Beware of any advice that tells you that "mod x is the only way to go". You need to taylor your mods to your car, other mods, driving style and driving type (race, road, etc). For example, I had WAY too much oversteer with the rear bar only when on race tires and an autocross alignment. Added front bar, still too much. I'm now running with the H-Sport competition front bar and the stock rear bar and it's just about perfect. For me.
I agree with the advice of leaving the suspension alone for street driving. BMW's engineers did a great job of making a fun ride. Believe me, the more you play with it, the more complicated it gets to keep it daily drivable.
I agree with the advice of leaving the suspension alone for street driving. BMW's engineers did a great job of making a fun ride. Believe me, the more you play with it, the more complicated it gets to keep it daily drivable.
Trending Topics
...I just finished returning all but component to stock...the Webb rear bar is set to near full soft - which is apparently softer than stock...
In an effort to chase down a nasty jiggle in the front end, I removed one front swaybar endlink and drove to work today. Now, the alignment is way off, but my general feeling is that the balance is not bad...actually surprisingly good.
The jiggle is not in the swaybar bushing or endlinks...so I'll look elsewhere. but when I have this settled and aligned, I will remove the endlink again to get a very good idea for performance.
Veni Vidi Vici's advise is really the best anyone can give.
In an effort to chase down a nasty jiggle in the front end, I removed one front swaybar endlink and drove to work today. Now, the alignment is way off, but my general feeling is that the balance is not bad...actually surprisingly good.
The jiggle is not in the swaybar bushing or endlinks...so I'll look elsewhere. but when I have this settled and aligned, I will remove the endlink again to get a very good idea for performance.
Veni Vidi Vici's advise is really the best anyone can give.
FYI, the larger front sway bar worked as intended for me and I'm really happy with the change. My goal was to be able to go a click or two softer on the front dampers to improve grip in sweepers but still retain the good transient response that I have with the front dampers set stiffer.
It worked. We had a very transient intensive course today, with only 3 sweepers. The car worked really well, with no push.
Like everything else in suspension setup, there are lots and lots of variables. For me, with my combination of hardware and settings, the slightly stiffer front swaybar resulted in LESS understeer due to the ability to run softer damper settings.
Scott
90SM
It worked. We had a very transient intensive course today, with only 3 sweepers. The car worked really well, with no push.
Like everything else in suspension setup, there are lots and lots of variables. For me, with my combination of hardware and settings, the slightly stiffer front swaybar resulted in LESS understeer due to the ability to run softer damper settings.
Scott
90SM
And in support of 90STX's experience, I disconnected one front swaybar link - after returning the car to 99% stock - the Webb bar remains. On fast long sweepers, the backend wants to come around the harder the throttle is pressed. Very nice turn-in during sharp corners, but one must beware at high speed. This is just an experiment. The swaybar link goes back in soon.
Last edited by meb; Jun 25, 2007 at 01:50 PM.
I ditto many of the comments made in this thread. The one thing I would add is this. The stock suspension setup is very forgiving, meaning that if you're pushing it through a turn and the car starts to loose traction, the traction loss is relatively progresive thus providing the driver with a reasonable time window to correct the problem. When you install a stiffer rear swaybar, you reduce understeer, as already mentioned, but the car also becomes less forgiving, meaning that if you now push the car through a turn and it starts to loose traction, that traction loss is much more snappy and the time window to corrrct the problem is much smaller. It's much the same scenario as the difference between treaded and slick tires; the latter will provide more traction through turns, but they loose grip with very little warning.
I would therefore recommend that when you install a stiffer rear swaybar, NEVER start off on the stiffest setting. Start on the lowest or medium setting and take it easy through the turns to give yourself time to learn the new handling dynamics of your car. It's very easy to swap ends in a turn when you have an over stiffened swaybar and you're not used to the way it handles.
I would therefore recommend that when you install a stiffer rear swaybar, NEVER start off on the stiffest setting. Start on the lowest or medium setting and take it easy through the turns to give yourself time to learn the new handling dynamics of your car. It's very easy to swap ends in a turn when you have an over stiffened swaybar and you're not used to the way it handles.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
34
Jul 16, 2020 12:54 PM
R50/53 Guidance on selling a 2005 S
Toolman
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
8
Jan 20, 2016 06:50 AM
silence2-38554
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
3
Nov 12, 2015 09:39 AM
ClayTaylorNC
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
6
Aug 10, 2015 09:19 PM






