MINI Camera and Video Interested in capturing your motoring experience? Discuss here your favorite video and photography skills using your MINI.

A Few Samples From My *ist Ds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #1  
macncheese's Avatar
macncheese
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 2
From: New Jersey
A Few Samples From My *ist Ds




Almost no post processing on these. JPEGS straight from the camera although I'll admit to warming the last one up a bit. Enjoying the challenge of full manual control and the whole DOF thing!

--
Cheese
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 07:20 PM
  #2  
minimonkey's Avatar
minimonkey
4th Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Very nice images. What camera/lens are you using?
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 07:55 PM
  #3  
blacknblue's Avatar
blacknblue
Photographer / Beer Dude
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 0
From: SoCal (562)
The DoF in the first two is great.
The 2nd pic makes me hungry!
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 05:28 AM
  #4  
macncheese's Avatar
macncheese
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 2
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by minimonkey
Very nice images. What camera/lens are you using?
Thanks. Its an *ist Ds with a 40mm limited pancake lens.

--
Cheese
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 05:54 AM
  #5  
dcmitchell's Avatar
dcmitchell
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Washington, DC
Very Nice Pics

Great color saturation and composition. The 40 mm lens you are using is really great. And I agree with you that the comment by Kaleria was totally not called for.

I look forward to your other posts. Do you have a web site with your photography?

dcmitchell
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 07:31 AM
  #6  
blacknblue's Avatar
blacknblue
Photographer / Beer Dude
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 0
From: SoCal (562)
This is a photography forum. The guy posted his photographs for feedback related to composition, exposure, and the like.
The pic with the young lady is an excellent example of using depth of field and getting a good exposure for skin tones.


I agree that your comment lacks respect and is not constructive at all.
 

Last edited by dave; May 17, 2005 at 08:08 AM.
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 07:38 AM
  #7  
blacknblue's Avatar
blacknblue
Photographer / Beer Dude
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 0
From: SoCal (562)
Originally Posted by dcmitchell
I look forward to your other posts. Do you have a web site with your photography?
DC,
Here's what I do to find the hosting website for a pic:
Hold your cursor down over image.
When popup menu appears, choose to open image in new window.
Copy the address from the location window, deleting the image's portion.

That's how I got this- http://photobucket.com/albums/v298/cheeseroc/PENTAX/
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 07:42 AM
  #8  
OctaneGuy's Avatar
OctaneGuy
Vendor & Moderator :: MINI Camera and Video & c3 club forum
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,967
Likes: 2
From: Anaheim, CA
Wow, colors are beautiful! Love the images!

Btw, I've sent a PM to Kaelaria about his manners or lack of.

Richard
Originally Posted by MACNCHEESE
Almost no post processing on these. JPEGS straight from the camera although I'll admit to warming the last one up a bit. Enjoying the challenge of full manual control and the whole DOF thing!

--
Cheese
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 07:47 AM
  #9  
M7's Avatar
M7
Former Vendor
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 2
From: los angeles
Originally Posted by macncheese
Thanks. Its an *ist Ds with a 40mm limited pancake lens.

--
Cheese

Dude.....the answer should be "It's a Pentax"

peter
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 07:57 AM
  #10  
kaelaria's Avatar
kaelaria
6th Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 1
From: Florida
.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 07:58 AM
  #11  
macncheese's Avatar
macncheese
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 2
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by M7
Dude.....the answer should be "It's a Pentax"

peter
Pete,
Sorry you dont approve of Pentax for whatever reason but my amateur needs and skills are pretty happy with it. I've heard you're a pretty well acclaimed photographer and would appreciate any constructive comments you may have. I'm just starting to learn this whole SLR thing.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 08:09 AM
  #12  
dave's Avatar
dave
pug poo picker-upper
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,803
Likes: 30
From: California
Originally Posted by blacknblue
This is a photography forum. The guy posted his photographs for feedback related to composition, exposure, and the like.
Here here.

To that end, the thread has been edited a bit. Let's keep this photography related from this point out.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 08:23 AM
  #13  
M7's Avatar
M7
Former Vendor
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 2
From: los angeles
Originally Posted by macncheese
Pete,
Sorry you dont approve of Pentax for whatever reason but my amateur needs and skills are pretty happy with it. I've heard you're a pretty well acclaimed photographer and would appreciate any constructive comments you may have. I'm just starting to learn this whole SLR thing.

On the contrary..... your answer was was like if some one would ask you
what wine you'r drinking and theanswer would be a Merlot.....The answer should
have been "Stags Leap" , that would have helped tremendously when he was
looking for "That" camera. And who said I don't approve of the Pentax.....
Bottom line It's not the camera that takes the picture it's the phototgraper. I can take bitching images with a pinhole camera, a Hasselblad
or my trusty Nikons, the brand makes no difference as long as it's not a
Canon.

peter
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 08:48 AM
  #14  
macncheese's Avatar
macncheese
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 2
From: New Jersey
I respectfully disagree with your analogy, I gave the model of the camera and the lens but thank you for detailing the manufacturer. It was an oversight on my part. He or she will definately be able to find the camera correctly now. My assumption that you arent fond of Pentax came from you use of the " " which I dont necessarily view as a positive endorsement.

Hopefully, between the two of us, we've answered all the questions regarding my photography equipment and your photography skills and everyone has all the information they've asked for.

--
Cheese
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 09:08 AM
  #15  
MiniCD's Avatar
MiniCD
5th Gear
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Cardiff CA
Cheese-
Gret pics. Just a couple of questions.
1. How does the 40mm translate to 35mm equivalent? Is it 1.5x or 1.6x?
2. What is the aperture used in the shots?

I read at least one review that claimed the *ist Ds "oversaturates" the color, but at least on my laptop, there is no evidence in your samples.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 10:27 AM
  #16  
macncheese's Avatar
macncheese
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 2
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by MiniCD
Cheese-
Gret pics. Just a couple of questions.
1. How does the 40mm translate to 35mm equivalent? Is it 1.5x or 1.6x?
2. What is the aperture used in the shots?

I read at least one review that claimed the *ist Ds "oversaturates" the color, but at least on my laptop, there is no evidence in your samples.
Thanks for the kind words. The crop factor on the *ist Ds is 1.5 and the aperture, i believe, is 2.8 on all shots.

I think the reason for what you've read about the color being oversaturated is that there is an image tone setting that defaults to "bright" which is really saturated and contrasty. The manual recommends the "natural" setting for most pictures.

I believe that most of the online testers use the camera with the "out of the box" setting and because of this weird disconnect between recommended and default, the reviews are slightly skewed. I'll try and take the same picture in both modes if you're interested.

--
Cheese
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 01:50 PM
  #17  
MiniCD's Avatar
MiniCD
5th Gear
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Cardiff CA
Originally Posted by macncheese
I think the reason for what you've read about the color being oversaturated is that there is an image tone setting that defaults to "bright" which is really saturated and contrasty. The manual recommends the "natural" setting for most pictures.

I believe that most of the online testers use the camera with the "out of the box" setting and because of this weird disconnect between recommended and default, the reviews are slightly skewed. I'll try and take the same picture in both modes if you're interested.

--
Cheese
Makes sense - the testers don't bother to read the manual.
With a P&S digital I find the mid contrast setting is good for most conditions, bland or what Canon calls 'Neutral' for sunlight and 'Vivid' to get some contrast when the light is very flat.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 05:12 PM
  #18  
KiLO's Avatar
KiLO
6th Gear
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Man, I love those pics! The composition is really nice, just my style.

Great job!
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 05:22 PM
  #19  
dandp's Avatar
dandp
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 0
From: Bridgewater, NJ
depth of field is king....good stuff cheese...manual control is great
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #20  
Kyle's Avatar
Kyle
3rd Gear
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by M7
the brand makes no difference as long as it's not a
Canon.

peter


And FWIW my limited experience with Pentax cameras has been entirely positive. And heck, any DSLR will be a better camera than almost all point and shoots.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wildwestrider
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
11
Jan 29, 2016 05:06 PM
adame
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
5
Aug 9, 2005 01:45 PM
Mark
Vendor Announcements
16
Jun 3, 2005 10:14 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:01 PM.