Nikon Camera advice please
#1
Nikon Camera advice please
I own 3 Nikon lenses so i want to stay Nikon.
I am interested in a digital slr..... looking at the D80,
D200, D300..
I am going to use it for photo journalism... i spend a lot of time driving and riding all over the east coast and Ii want to start getting pictures for a possible book.... so the photos need to be good enough to publish..... i know very little so be gentle
I am interested in a digital slr..... looking at the D80,
D200, D300..
I am going to use it for photo journalism... i spend a lot of time driving and riding all over the east coast and Ii want to start getting pictures for a possible book.... so the photos need to be good enough to publish..... i know very little so be gentle
#2
#3
Thanks.... Im leaning toward the D80 but the 300 looks pretty nice
#4
#5
I was in the same situation, had Nikon lenses, so I went with the D80. It had been years since I used my old 6006 so I wanted something that was easy yet still had the capability for fine tuning once I relearned some stuff. I'm sure the D200 and D300 are better but I'm only familiar with the D80. Here's a shot in full automatic mode. Click for larger version.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Depending on which lenses you have/plan to get, keep in mind that the D40 will only autofocus with the newer AF-S lenses. Even the fairly-recent "G" lenses have to be manually focused.
In other words, the D40/D40x doesn't have an autofocus motor built into the body itself, so if the lens doesn't have an autofocus motor in it, it will have to be manually-focused.
In other words, the D40/D40x doesn't have an autofocus motor built into the body itself, so if the lens doesn't have an autofocus motor in it, it will have to be manually-focused.
#9
I was in the same boat - i had some Nikon glass and another Tamron WA that i bought for my N80. I went for the D70s. If i were you, i would probably get the D80 and a digital lens or two. The DSLRs have a smaller image sensor compared to the 35mm SLRs and hence there is an automatic zoom factor involved (~1.5). For most purposes, this is not a huge deal but for wide angle shots you might find yourself backing up frequently
I recommend reading Popular Photography forums as well as Nikonians.org - both are great forums for this kinda questions. Remember, the camera and the lens can only do so much - it's your eyes and hands that do a lot of the work (or a tripod + IR remote ).
Bottom line: I would get a D80 and a decent VR (vibration reduction) lens from Nikon. I was looking at the 18-200 DX VR which was going for around 700$. Do a little more research and you will be a guru very soon
I recommend reading Popular Photography forums as well as Nikonians.org - both are great forums for this kinda questions. Remember, the camera and the lens can only do so much - it's your eyes and hands that do a lot of the work (or a tripod + IR remote ).
Bottom line: I would get a D80 and a decent VR (vibration reduction) lens from Nikon. I was looking at the 18-200 DX VR which was going for around 700$. Do a little more research and you will be a guru very soon
#10
I was in the same situation, had Nikon lenses, so I went with the D80. It had been years since I used my old 6006 so I wanted something that was easy yet still had the capability for fine tuning once I relearned some stuff. I'm sure the D200 and D300 are better but I'm only familiar with the D80. Here's a shot in full automatic mode. Click for larger version.
#11
#12
#13
6th Gear
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Check out http://www.kenrockwell.com/index.htm
This guy tells it like it is with Nikon goodies. Pro photographer with TONS of great advice.
This guy tells it like it is with Nikon goodies. Pro photographer with TONS of great advice.
#14
This was taken using a 3MP camera 4 years ago - have the higher res. pic somewhere on my PC. No optical zoom, just about nothing fancy - just a plain old (POS) P&S.
#15
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d80/vs-d70.htm - some people hate him - some love him - either way cannot ignore him.
#16
That's my favourite lens, by a wide margin. It's all but replaced my 18-55mm, 70-300mm, and 50mm f1.8 (although I still pull that one out occasionally for really crisp low-light stuff).
#17
/\ nice!
some of mine that we made into a calendar.....from my trip to the Neuquen province of Argentina....the northern part of Patagonia. We climbed Volcan Lanin on the Chilean border....it's an analog to Mt Hood in Oregon...similar size and difficulty.
one thing I've noticed with newer cameras is better color saturation and more natural color balance. that's the one area we had to tweak with my older Nikon. I've got a newer model now that was much better in this area. The other thing is actual pic size....the uncompressed tiff shots I took were tiny in physical size (massive in file size) and utterly unusable.
I've gone back and forth about a new Nikon D-SLR but I tend to use my 7.2mp Sony with Zeiss lens for everything, never even pulling my older Nikon out.
That said, I see a proper D-SLR in the hands of an experienced user and it makes me want one. I just don't think it's 100% necessary for everybody, even if you plan to publish the pics in a book.
some of mine that we made into a calendar.....from my trip to the Neuquen province of Argentina....the northern part of Patagonia. We climbed Volcan Lanin on the Chilean border....it's an analog to Mt Hood in Oregon...similar size and difficulty.
one thing I've noticed with newer cameras is better color saturation and more natural color balance. that's the one area we had to tweak with my older Nikon. I've got a newer model now that was much better in this area. The other thing is actual pic size....the uncompressed tiff shots I took were tiny in physical size (massive in file size) and utterly unusable.
I've gone back and forth about a new Nikon D-SLR but I tend to use my 7.2mp Sony with Zeiss lens for everything, never even pulling my older Nikon out.
That said, I see a proper D-SLR in the hands of an experienced user and it makes me want one. I just don't think it's 100% necessary for everybody, even if you plan to publish the pics in a book.
Last edited by PGT; 11-25-2007 at 05:57 AM.
#18
M6
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisville, Colorado
Posts: 7,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I shoot with a D70s, just remember to keep the CCD very clean. I have looked at the D80 and D40x, I would consider a 40x for a backup camera.
also, it is nice to have a simple P&S in you pocket for those times you don't have the gear with you or are just not wanting to tote the Nikon. my current pocket digitals are Sony W1 and W80.
The Nikon shoots a little cool, so you if you want warm shots you will have to adjust your camera settings. An alternative is to shoot with the Canon DSLR which does shoot warmer. I prefer the Nikon.
This is a shot last summer with the D70s, Nikon 55-200 AF. Not the most expensive piece of glass but it performed well and some of the pictures were used by the local BMW club, but they lost a lot in publication in a b&w newsletter.
also, it is nice to have a simple P&S in you pocket for those times you don't have the gear with you or are just not wanting to tote the Nikon. my current pocket digitals are Sony W1 and W80.
The Nikon shoots a little cool, so you if you want warm shots you will have to adjust your camera settings. An alternative is to shoot with the Canon DSLR which does shoot warmer. I prefer the Nikon.
This is a shot last summer with the D70s, Nikon 55-200 AF. Not the most expensive piece of glass but it performed well and some of the pictures were used by the local BMW club, but they lost a lot in publication in a b&w newsletter.
#19
one of my favorite photogs is Paul Hansen. His pics have a certain look to them. He uses a Canon 20D. I asked him for advice on what to buy and made the comment that I should plan to spend at least 50% of the total expenditure on the glass. Seems to be solid advice. His site www.sevenphotos.com
#20
Seconded. This is the probably the last lens I will put on my D70. Great for 99% of what you might need to do. Only problem is that it's in short supply.
#21
I've been shooting a D70 for some time and love it, but sometimes wish for more, like a D200. Not that it takes better pictures, but the usability of the camera.
Here's a couple of samples from Yosemite and basic HDR processing in Photoshop.
Here's a couple from AMVIV 2007 (had to include at least ONE with MINI's)
Here's a couple of samples from Yosemite and basic HDR processing in Photoshop.
Here's a couple from AMVIV 2007 (had to include at least ONE with MINI's)
#22