Interior/Exterior GP underbody panels?
#1
#3
#4
Deviant
I would have to disagree with you on the benefit. It seems MINI spent a lot of time in the wind tunnel with the GP. I don't think they would have bothered with all that expense, time and cost of the parts if they did not believe they were worth the performance benefit. Especially throwing money at an item that no one will see unless they are under the car.
Steve
I would have to disagree with you on the benefit. It seems MINI spent a lot of time in the wind tunnel with the GP. I don't think they would have bothered with all that expense, time and cost of the parts if they did not believe they were worth the performance benefit. Especially throwing money at an item that no one will see unless they are under the car.
Steve
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#10
#12
Deviant
I would have to disagree with you on the benefit. It seems MINI spent a lot of time in the wind tunnel with the GP. I don't think they would have bothered with all that expense, time and cost of the parts if they did not believe they were worth the performance benefit. Especially throwing money at an item that no one will see unless they are under the car.
Steve
I would have to disagree with you on the benefit. It seems MINI spent a lot of time in the wind tunnel with the GP. I don't think they would have bothered with all that expense, time and cost of the parts if they did not believe they were worth the performance benefit. Especially throwing money at an item that no one will see unless they are under the car.
Steve
#17
Deviant
I would have to disagree with you on the benefit. It seems MINI spent a lot of time in the wind tunnel with the GP. I don't think they would have bothered with all that expense, time and cost of the parts if they did not believe they were worth the performance benefit. Especially throwing money at an item that no one will see unless they are under the car.
Steve
I would have to disagree with you on the benefit. It seems MINI spent a lot of time in the wind tunnel with the GP. I don't think they would have bothered with all that expense, time and cost of the parts if they did not believe they were worth the performance benefit. Especially throwing money at an item that no one will see unless they are under the car.
Steve
I was thinking that you don't need real high end material (plastic should work). I wish there was an option for us....
Bhozar- you adding them to an '03?
#18
I was at a local meet the other day and got to see a GP. I looked under neath and all I can say is "WOW" Those panels are amazing and make the underside almost completely flat! They have got to work. The owner told me that there is a very noticeable difference in high speed handling compared to a regular cooper
#19
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Evesham, Worcestershire, England
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
1 Post
Yeah, I am adding them to an Feb 03 MCS. I dont have the GP side skirts. I considered them due ot the aerodynamics, and ruled them out due to them being pig ugly. I went with standard aero side skirts, GP front bumper and GP rear trim.
I'm dropping my car off tomorrow to get everything fitted.
The panels are not completely flat. They have some chanels in them and the points when the bolts go dip up to the body/chasis. I imagine the channel are there for strength, as without them the panel would flex, bend and sag.
I dont know if the R56 panels are the same or different. They certainly look the same.
I'm dropping my car off tomorrow to get everything fitted.
The panels are not completely flat. They have some chanels in them and the points when the bolts go dip up to the body/chasis. I imagine the channel are there for strength, as without them the panel would flex, bend and sag.
I dont know if the R56 panels are the same or different. They certainly look the same.
#22
6th Gear
iTrader: (10)
Twitchy because of roof line and space not due to neg air pressure
You are correct about the twitchy at high speeds in the MCS, but the turbulance under the car is not the initial cause. Because of the massive roof area of the mini the roof acts like a aircraft wing actually providing lift, remember too the MINI weighs in about 2,400 lbs....
I would bet that the GP has a different style rear spoiler and a lower front spoiler air dam/side skirts and poss even a lower ride height than the MCS. All combined would provide the stability you are looking for..... ( each component accents the other)
#23
I'd say that's a good bet I've since added TSW springs and have returned to Germany. DB is much more stable at Autobahn speed now than when new (and standard)
#24
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Evesham, Worcestershire, England
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
1 Post
As promised, pictures of the GP underbody panels fitted my my Feb 03 MINI. Was fitted by ThinkMini, they used clinch nuts to get it all fitted, and it fits perfectly with the aero side skirts. Not sure how long it took. The finish is first rate, and looks perfectly level. My GTT front brace fits on the outside of the panels, and the spacers for it fit inside the panels.
The under body panels match my GP front and rear bumpers:
The under body panels match my GP front and rear bumpers:
Last edited by Bhozar; 07-31-2008 at 04:19 PM.
#25