GP Talk (2006) Discussion of the limited edition, MINI Cooper S (R53)-based, John Cooper Works GP.

Changing the rear sway bar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-15-2013, 03:47 PM
willieboy's Avatar
willieboy
willieboy is offline
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Camarillo, CA
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have an appointment next Thursday to have power flex control arm bushings, front sway bar bushings, Ireland 1.5 fixed camber plates and a Hotchkiss adjustable 19MM rear sway bar installed. Also a four wheel alignment. So I have talked to two different folks and been told not to do the rear sway bar? Both have serious knowledge of the MINI GP. I wonder now if I should pass on the rear sway bar? Anyone have an opinion? Thanks in advance for any replies from my fellow GP owners.

GP1257.
 

Last edited by willieboy; 06-15-2013 at 04:03 PM.
  #2  
Old 06-17-2013, 10:17 AM
quikmni's Avatar
quikmni
quikmni is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orcutt, CA
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Go with the 19mm rear sway bar.
Based on experience with my first 2003 R53 (many suspension upgrades), when I got the 2006 GP I started the suspension upgrades with camber plates (set at-2 deg). I drove that way for a year or two but wanted a little less understeer. I added a 19mm rear sway bar with the camber plates and it is a great combination. I currently have the bar set on the stiffest setting for street/Auto-X. I am running the stock JCW springs and shocks.
 
  #3  
Old 06-17-2013, 10:51 AM
willieboy's Avatar
willieboy
willieboy is offline
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Camarillo, CA
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by quikmni
Go with the 19mm rear sway bar.
Based on experience with my first 2003 R53 (many suspension upgrades), when I got the 2006 GP I started the suspension upgrades with camber plates (set at-2 deg). I drove that way for a year or two but wanted a little less understeer. I added a 19mm rear sway bar with the camber plates and it is a great combination. I currently have the bar set on the stiffest setting for street/Auto-X. I am running the stock JCW springs and shocks.
Thank you so much for this information. It is VERY helpful. Just what I needed. First hand knowledge

GP1257.
 
  #4  
Old 06-17-2013, 10:51 AM
ZippyNH's Avatar
ZippyNH
ZippyNH is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 32 Posts
Usually when you add camber plates....you reduce the need for a bigger rear sway bar....
So a adjustable 19 IMO might be perfect....a huge one (aka the hollow comp bar) IMO would not be good....but a 19mm will give you just enough IMO to make you smile!
 
  #5  
Old 06-17-2013, 10:54 AM
willieboy's Avatar
willieboy
willieboy is offline
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Camarillo, CA
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I new you guys would come through I feel better about it now.

GP1257.
 
  #6  
Old 06-18-2013, 12:37 PM
NEUMISMATIC's Avatar
NEUMISMATIC
NEUMISMATIC is offline
1st Gear
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Monrovia, CA
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
broken sway bar; replace with??

This seems related, but maybe should be it's own new topic...

My Hotchkis sway bar broke at the passenger-side bend.
My MCS 2005 has Koni FSD dampers, lower rear cabmer control arms, 19mm sway bar, H-sport springs. Would you replace with the same H sport or other brand & why? ... H&S, Alta, Ireland Engineering (similar to Alta with the welded ends)?
I've done my research on NAM & the manufacturer's sites. What's your opinion?
 
  #7  
Old 06-18-2013, 12:59 PM
quikmni's Avatar
quikmni
quikmni is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orcutt, CA
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Seems like the broken sway topic bar should be a new thread for a couple reasons.
- This is a GP thread and your topic would get more visibility in a more appropriate forum.
- You will hear from people with a similar problem.
- You will get more opinions.
 
  #8  
Old 06-20-2013, 05:50 PM
willieboy's Avatar
willieboy
willieboy is offline
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Camarillo, CA
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got the camber plates, bushings and rear sway bar installed today. The alignment was completed too. Found out the the rear camber is at 1.9 going in and that happens to be the stock numbers for the GP per the technician. The front is now 1.8 and she drives great and straight. Now if I just had those sticky tires I want cornering is much nicer for sure.

GP1257.
 
  #9  
Old 06-20-2013, 11:26 PM
quikmni's Avatar
quikmni
quikmni is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orcutt, CA
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Should be a nice setup.
I am surprised that the rear camber could not be reduced to a little less negative but maybe the tech did not know to try. It would be better to have less negative camber in the rear. I am able to get to -1.5 to-1.6 in the rear with the stock adjustment but would prefer around -1.0 in the rear. To get less then -1.5 will require adding adjustable rear lower control arm. Next time you get an alignment ask them to adjust the rear camber to as little negative as possible.

You can also adjust the front and rear toe to improve handling and reduce tire wear.
 
  #10  
Old 06-21-2013, 12:42 PM
willieboy's Avatar
willieboy
willieboy is offline
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Camarillo, CA
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by quikmni
Should be a nice setup.
I am surprised that the rear camber could not be reduced to a little less negative but maybe the tech did not know to try. It would be better to have less negative camber in the rear. I am able to get to -1.5 to-1.6 in the rear with the stock adjustment but would prefer around -1.0 in the rear. To get less then -1.5 will require adding adjustable rear lower control arm. Next time you get an alignment ask them to adjust the rear camber to as little negative as possible.

You can also adjust the front and rear toe to improve handling and reduce tire wear.
Thank you for this. I actually discussed this with the technician and he verified that he could adjust the rear to 1.5ish but the factory recommended spec was 1.9 so I said okay I don't understand enough yet to know better. Dang it! Would it handle better in your opinion at 1.5 in the rear?
 
  #11  
Old 06-21-2013, 03:08 PM
quikmni's Avatar
quikmni
quikmni is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orcutt, CA
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Don't worry about it much.
In general you are trying to get the rear to tend towards being a little looser than the front (oversteer rather understeer). One way to do that is to reduce the rear camber so the rear has a little less traction when cornering. Just like you increased the negative camber in the front to get better front traction when cornering you want to reduce the rear traction slightly by reducing the negative camber.

I also adjust the front toe to slight toe-out rather than normal toe-in and I adjust the rear toe to zero. This helps reduce tire wear because the tire does not scrub across the inside edge of the tire. Zero to slight toe-out slightly reduces the straight line but improves turn-in response and reduces tire wear. Just one of the various compromises you can make with alignment changes. There are various posts about alignment settings to learn more and help you decide what is best for your driving style.
 
  #12  
Old 06-21-2013, 03:35 PM
willieboy's Avatar
willieboy
willieboy is offline
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Camarillo, CA
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by quikmni
Don't worry about it much.
In general you are trying to get the rear to tend towards being a little looser than the front (oversteer rather understeer). One way to do that is to reduce the rear camber so the rear has a little less traction when cornering. Just like you increased the negative camber in the front to get better front traction when cornering you want to reduce the rear traction slightly by reducing the negative camber.

I also adjust the front toe to slight toe-out rather than normal toe-in and I adjust the rear toe to zero. This helps reduce tire wear because the tire does not scrub across the inside edge of the tire. Zero to slight toe-out slightly reduces the straight line but improves turn-in response and reduces tire wear. Just one of the various compromises you can make with alignment changes. There are various posts about alignment settings to learn more and help you decide what is best for your driving style.
Thank you for the clarification and explanation. Excellent knowledge! Appreciate it very much. I won't have a chance to really put it through the paces for a few days. Once I do, I will report back. Mulholland here I come

GP1257.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
34
07-16-2020 12:54 PM
W0TM8
General MINI Talk
23
12-19-2019 07:50 AM
Bennyboy
MINIs & Minis for Sale
2
08-18-2015 07:28 AM
nomar116
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
6
08-10-2015 11:24 PM
OutMotoring
Vendor Announcements
0
08-06-2015 09:32 AM



Quick Reply: Changing the rear sway bar



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:36 AM.