Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain Intercooler Theory

Old Sep 30, 2006 | 10:26 AM
  #26  
stevecars60's Avatar
stevecars60
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 1
From: Northampton MA
Originally Posted by riquiscott
Actually, the Ideal Gas Law is for static gases in enclosed containers, not for gases flowing through a heat exchanger. That's why there's nothing in PV=nRT that will account for pressure/velocity changes due to changes in cross-sectional area at the inlet or outlet.

Also, if you try to use the Ideal Gas Law for this purpose, don't forget that as T decreases, n will increase as the density of the air goes up. That makes it impossible to use the IGL to determine what will happen to pressure as temperature changes, without knowing whether n increased more than T decreased.

Scott
Exactly

Add restriction to the IC = more SC heat.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2006 | 10:24 PM
  #27  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 4
From: Woodside, CA
I originally was going to write...

Originally Posted by riquiscott
That makes it impossible to use the IGL to determine what will happen to pressure as temperature changes, without knowing whether n increased more than T decreased.
that the Ideal Gas Law, with a dash of thermodynamics, is all it takes......

But to know number density, all you need to know is the pressure and temp.... That's the basis of speed/density engine management.

Matt
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 03:39 AM
  #28  
ScottRiqui's Avatar
ScottRiqui
OVERDRIVE
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 8
From: Norfolk, VA
Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
that the Ideal Gas Law, with a dash of thermodynamics, is all it takes......

But to know number density, all you need to know is the pressure and temp.... That's the basis of speed/density engine management.

Matt
Yes, but my point was that since both 'n' and 'P' vary with 'T', that makes it impossible to quantitively determine what the effect on 'P' will be if you change 'T', since gas is free to move into or out of the intercooler. (Something the IGL doesn't address)

Regardless, the Ideal Gas Law is *still* the wrong equation for this application. The IGL is written for static conditions (no flow), in enclosed containers. It is *not* the appropriate formula for fluid flow through a heat exchanger, either steady-state or dynamic flow.

Grab a thermodynamics and fluid-flow textbook for the correct formulas. Some of the correct formulas may *resemble* the IGL, but they account for a lot more variables, like pressure changes due to velocity changes, resistance in the pipes, pressure/velocity changes due to changes in cross-sectional area, laminar versus turbulent flow, etcetera. All things that are VERY important in automotive theory.

If you've had Physics and Mechanics in college, do you remember how it was broken up into Statics and Dynamics? This is the same thing. The Ideal Gas Law is a "statics" problem, and thermodynamics and fluid flow is the "dynamics" equivalent to it.

Scott
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 07:38 PM
  #29  
herbie hind's Avatar
herbie hind
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,339
Likes: 1
pass that stuff over here guys . wow . bill nigh !!!
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 07:40 PM
  #30  
obehave's Avatar
obehave
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA
Originally Posted by herbie hind
pass that stuff over here guys . wow . bill nigh !!!

My eyes go dry reading that and then it gets all fuzzy
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 07:28 PM
  #31  
PGT's Avatar
PGT
Banned
iTrader: (11)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,681
Likes: 1
From: DC Metro
anybody know the details on the system in this pic?? I haven't been around NAM long enough to recognize it.

 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 07:33 PM
  #32  
nabeshin's Avatar
nabeshin
Functioning Lunatic
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,237
Likes: 6
From: Lincoln, NE
It apears to some kind of apparatus disigned to impead flow by adding bends and to ruin the efficency of the main radiator and air conditioning condenser...




one more thing, if you have driven you mini a long time, you can increase the efficiency of the stock inter cooler by cleaning the inside with carb/throttle body cleaner. Also, pick up an oil catch can to keep the intercooler clean.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 07:38 PM
  #33  
PGT's Avatar
PGT
Banned
iTrader: (11)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,681
Likes: 1
From: DC Metro


A buddy took the pic out at Buttonwillow and was intrigued. Any helpful info?
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 07:50 PM
  #34  
ouzo's Avatar
ouzo
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: LI - massapequa
thats a front mount intercooler and according to these guys Webb makes it
http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...641CE3CE56.htm

http://videos.streetfire.net/search/...98E71600DA.htm

i always thought that was just an experiment..
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 08:06 PM
  #35  
DrPhilGandini's Avatar
DrPhilGandini
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
I know this IC very well! I saw it first last year, about 18 months ago on the Mule in Randy Webb's shop. It sounds like a screaming banshee! I only saw and heard it static on the car. Later, at AMVIV (Las Vegas) I saw it installed on the car in the photo shown here. The guy who owned the car confirmed it was Webb's prototype. Randy had moved to the Gintani W2A system.
This car went out 3 times to lap, and each time returned within 3 laps. The boots between the CF horns and the IC kept moving up and loosening, and eventually leaking, causing massive loss of power on the track. He seemed frustrated, but claimed it was magic when not leaking, and that on the street it worked just fine, never slipping and leaking.
It's a great idea, but the CF and boots cannot cope with the engine movement, especially under hard accell. and decell.s

Anyway, that's what I know about this system.
cheers,
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 08:08 PM
  #36  
PGT's Avatar
PGT
Banned
iTrader: (11)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,681
Likes: 1
From: DC Metro
thanks for the 411. I wonder if his issues were solved with that engine damper. I know both our MINI's have smoother off throttle with them installed.
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 08:17 PM
  #37  
obehave's Avatar
obehave
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA
Originally Posted by gandini
I know this IC very well! I saw it first last year, about 18 months ago on the Mule in Randy Webb's shop. It sounds like a screaming banshee! I only saw and heard it static on the car. Later, at AMVIV (Las Vegas) I saw it installed on the car in the photo shown here. The guy who owned the car confirmed it was Webb's prototype. Randy had moved to the Gintani W2A system.
This car went out 3 times to lap, and each time returned within 3 laps. The boots between the CF horns and the IC kept moving up and loosening, and eventually leaking, causing massive loss of power on the track. He seemed frustrated, but claimed it was magic when not leaking, and that on the street it worked just fine, never slipping and leaking.
It's a great idea, but the CF and boots cannot cope with the engine movement, especially under hard accell. and decell.s

Anyway, that's what I know about this system.
cheers,
It's gone bye bye. Randy doesn't sell it any more.
Someone else may.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 05:42 AM
  #38  
DrPhilGandini's Avatar
DrPhilGandini
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
obehave is right--it's like the Parrot. It's an ex-IC, defunct, no more. It was a classic example of the tradeoff between lower pressure but higher flow and greater thermal efficiency. No numbers were ever produced, but my guess is that if you could have kept those boots sealed, the sucker would have produced some cold IATs.
back to story...
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 05:59 AM
  #39  
PGT's Avatar
PGT
Banned
iTrader: (11)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,681
Likes: 1
From: DC Metro
Originally Posted by obehave
It's gone bye bye. Randy doesn't sell it any more.
Someone else may.
still listed for sale at $2350

 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 06:29 AM
  #40  
stevecars60's Avatar
stevecars60
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 1
From: Northampton MA
Originally Posted by Patagonian GT
still listed for sale at $2350

Oh! Is that all?
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 07:35 AM
  #41  
DrPhilGandini's Avatar
DrPhilGandini
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
Well, I'm buyin' it! I'll hang it on the wall of my garage, and call it "performance art". That's pretty cheap for sculpture, actually. I'll stick with the DFIC for my car...
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 07:39 AM
  #42  
PGT's Avatar
PGT
Banned
iTrader: (11)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,681
Likes: 1
From: DC Metro
yeah....cost is about 2x what most quality aftermarket FMIC's cost. Unless it's a Spearco core, I don't get it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 01:46 PM
  #43  
herbie hind's Avatar
herbie hind
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,339
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Patagonian GT
anybody know the details on the system in this pic?? I haven't been around NAM long enough to recognize it.

good god man ;what the hell is that? !!! too much pressure drop to be sure.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 01:52 PM
  #44  
PGT's Avatar
PGT
Banned
iTrader: (11)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,681
Likes: 1
From: DC Metro
claimed 2psi drop, 85% more flow and 17hp increase.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 03:39 PM
  #45  
obehave's Avatar
obehave
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA
Originally Posted by Patagonian GT
still listed for sale at $2350

D'oh!
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2006 | 04:35 AM
  #46  
stevecars60's Avatar
stevecars60
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 1
From: Northampton MA
Originally Posted by gandini
Well, I'm buyin' it! I'll hang it on the wall of my garage, and call it "performance art". That's pretty cheap for sculpture, actually. I'll stick with the DFIC for my car...
Di di,da da, dit dit, da da de de, dit dit, de de de, de thin dont work no mo.
Free "performance art".
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2006 | 04:20 PM
  #47  
ouzo's Avatar
ouzo
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: LI - massapequa
im not that good yet with this stuff but wouldnt that whole maze of going down through and then back up kinda cut down the amount of air and everything?..
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2006 | 04:25 PM
  #48  
ScottRiqui's Avatar
ScottRiqui
OVERDRIVE
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 8
From: Norfolk, VA
Originally Posted by ouzo
im not that good yet with this stuff but wouldnt that whole maze of going down through and then back up kinda cut down the amount of air and everything?..
That's nothing compared to the intake path for a lot of cars with large front-mounted intercoolers.

If the numbers are to be believed, the design worked.

Scott
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 12:19 PM
  #49  
checkers's Avatar
checkers
5th Gear
15 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 60
From: Modesto, Ca
I've got a water to air IC and it's just fine. I had it dynoed a couple of times and had no loss of HP after 3 runs do to heat. I don't need a fan blowing over the IC when it's on the dyno. It has a selfcontained system with it own radiator and water pump.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #50  
obehave's Avatar
obehave
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,196
Likes: 0
From: Hampton, VA
Originally Posted by checkers
I've got a water to air IC and it's just fine. I had it dynoed a couple of times and had no loss of HP after 3 runs do to heat. I don't need a fan blowing over the IC when it's on the dyno. It has a selfcontained system with it own radiator and water pump.
You do need a fan blowing over the radiator for the W to A IC though.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:35 PM.