Drivetrain To prevent further hijacking of another thread I have a question.
Pulley question that began elsewhere
In regards to pulleys, It seems to be common knowledge that they are not the #s as advertised, a few different measurement points and you can come up with some different actual sizes and ratios, but there seems to be an across the board inconsistancy about size of the pulley in relation to the blower speed which changes at very different rate than the pulley changing size, so I am looking for a direct explination for this.
Here are the #s that have been found so far.
Here are the #s that have been found so far.
We decided that the best area to measure was around the pulley where the belt sits, rather than just the diameter of the face. Here are the stats:
Stock Pulley = 8" 5/16
JCW Pulley = 7" 7/16
15% Pulley = 7" 3/16
According to these #s
15% pulley is 86.466% of original
JCW pulley is 89.473% of original
Stock Pulley = 8" 5/16
JCW Pulley = 7" 7/16
15% Pulley = 7" 3/16
According to these #s
15% pulley is 86.466% of original
JCW pulley is 89.473% of original
Originally Posted by andy@ross-tech.com
Using my calculations, the percentage increase in blower speed for each pulley over stock is:
stock: 0% (duh!)
jcw: 15.8%
p&d "15%": 16.8%
p&d "17%": 19.4%
p&d "19%": 23.2%
stock: 0% (duh!)
jcw: 15.8%
p&d "15%": 16.8%
p&d "17%": 19.4%
p&d "19%": 23.2%
Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
but the marketing labels are the ones that persist.
Matt
Matt
No problem...
but it's still true that the pulley diameter isn't the only thing that goes into the math. It's still true that the drive ratios are calculated with the diameter of the crank pulley, the SC pulley and the effects of the belt. And it's still true that Andy's math is the only one that recreates the drive ratio of the SC that is listed in the Mini Cooper S technical literature.
Matt
Matt
Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
but it's still true that the pulley diameter isn't the only thing that goes into the math. It's still true that the drive ratios are calculated with the diameter of the crank pulley, the SC pulley and the effects of the belt. And it's still true that Andy's math is the only one that recreates the drive ratio of the SC that is listed in the Mini Cooper S technical literature.
Matt
Matt
Its all about the belt. The accessory pulleys are all driven by the belt. There is a woven core in the belt that prevents it from stretching while its being pulling around. This woven core is the only place you can measure belt speed.
What determines the overdrive or underdrive of accessories is the ratio of the diameters created by wrapping the belt around the pullies and measuring the distance from the center of the pulley to the center of this core, which is ever so slightly greater than the pulley diameter.
You're correct in that its only determine by the ratio of the diameters, its just not the pulley diameters. Hope that helps.
What determines the overdrive or underdrive of accessories is the ratio of the diameters created by wrapping the belt around the pullies and measuring the distance from the center of the pulley to the center of this core, which is ever so slightly greater than the pulley diameter.
You're correct in that its only determine by the ratio of the diameters, its just not the pulley diameters. Hope that helps.
Trending Topics
the reduction SC spin ratios compared to stock are the same as the ratios of reduction SC pulley dia to stock pulley dia, measured the same way. measured at the bottom. top or middle of groove...it doesn't matter.
(SCP1,2,4...\CP)\(SCstock\CP)=SCP1,2,3...\SCstock
(SCP1,2,4...\CP)\(SCstock\CP)=SCP1,2,3...\SCstock
Originally Posted by jlm
the reduction SC spin ratios compared to stock are the same as the ratios of reduction SC pulley dia to stock pulley dia, measured the same way. measured at the bottom. top or middle of groove...it doesn't matter.
(SCP1,2,4...\CP)\(SCstock\CP)=SCP1,2,3...\SCstock
(SCP1,2,4...\CP)\(SCstock\CP)=SCP1,2,3...\SCstock
15/5=3
If the belt centerline was .5" further away,
15.5/5.5=2.81
What am I missing!?
not exactly...
there really is an appropriate amount to add over the diameter of the pulleys, and that is determined by the belt construction. Only this amount will give you correct drive ratios, and ratio changes with different pulley diameters.
Matt
Matt
Well at least we're learning, I understand the belt plays factor in this but I don't see how a different size belt is yeilding not linear, changes that are different from the rastio the pulley was changed, cause in my mideval way of thinking if the pulley goes down a certain x%, the belt needs to be x% shorter which would mean the same x% increase in blower speed. I have the fisrt % and the last % but I'm trying to figure out why somewhere in the middle things are changing.
Please forgive me if this is nieave or uneduacted afterall thats why I'm asking!
Please forgive me if this is nieave or uneduacted afterall thats why I'm asking!
It's because
the real effective radius is the pully diameter plus a bit. If you only take the 15% off the pully diameter and not the bit, you end up with a new effective radius that is not 15% different in diameter!
Matt
Matt
And I calculate effective radius through
??
What determines the overdrive or underdrive of accessories is the ratio of the diameters created by wrapping the belt around the pullies and measuring the distance from the center of the pulley to the center of this core, which is ever so slightly greater than the pulley diameter.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Grizld700
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
2
Dec 30, 2015 10:47 AM



