Drivetrain 19% + 4% crank pulley
http://www.automotive.eaton.com/prod...argers/M45.asp
Look at the temps that just 10 psi puts out at 14000 RPM. With the pulleys you want to run you will be well above that rev number and boost number. Are you trying to fry your car or something?
Has anyone tried to put a larger blower or Eaton's newer model in the car yet??
http://www.capa.com.au/eaton_mp45_4th.htm
Look at the temps that just 10 psi puts out at 14000 RPM. With the pulleys you want to run you will be well above that rev number and boost number. Are you trying to fry your car or something?
Has anyone tried to put a larger blower or Eaton's newer model in the car yet??
http://www.capa.com.au/eaton_mp45_4th.htm
Originally Posted by JCampos
http://www.automotive.eaton.com/prod...argers/M45.asp
Look at the temps that just 10 psi puts out at 14000 RPM. With the pulleys you want to run you will be well above that rev number and boost number. Are you trying to fry your car or something?
Has anyone tried to put a larger blower or Eaton's newer model in the car yet??
http://www.capa.com.au/eaton_mp45_4th.htm
Look at the temps that just 10 psi puts out at 14000 RPM. With the pulleys you want to run you will be well above that rev number and boost number. Are you trying to fry your car or something?
Has anyone tried to put a larger blower or Eaton's newer model in the car yet??
http://www.capa.com.au/eaton_mp45_4th.htm
Originally Posted by JCampos
oh, and save yourself the hassle. Randy Webb has done that already and the engineer from Eaton he talked to said that 19% was too much for the blower.
Bluminime,
I didn't take your reply as a flame. It was late and I was probably thinking about diesel, and partly wrong about the octane thing anyway. Should have kept the response to "116 octane won't help much" - more fuel might... With regard to pinging and detonation, can't wait for direct injection motors!
Spillman,
With all due respect to your goals, and, your individuality; common sense says be a tad conservative unless you really want to push the limits and watch things break. I should have stated that my comments are from the perspective of driving my car for 200,000 miles. That said, there have been tests done by folks - Randy Webb, Peter M7 - in an effort to determine the point of deminishing return with regard to pulley/crankpulley size. After a while, heat builds up to a point where power is lost. I completely understand jlm's reasoning; shift sooner. I personally find shifting the power band around a waste of time when an awful lot of power cvan be had right up to redline. jlm, if you're reading, I certainly did not mean to insult you, not ever.
Michael
I didn't take your reply as a flame. It was late and I was probably thinking about diesel, and partly wrong about the octane thing anyway. Should have kept the response to "116 octane won't help much" - more fuel might... With regard to pinging and detonation, can't wait for direct injection motors!
Spillman,
With all due respect to your goals, and, your individuality; common sense says be a tad conservative unless you really want to push the limits and watch things break. I should have stated that my comments are from the perspective of driving my car for 200,000 miles. That said, there have been tests done by folks - Randy Webb, Peter M7 - in an effort to determine the point of deminishing return with regard to pulley/crankpulley size. After a while, heat builds up to a point where power is lost. I completely understand jlm's reasoning; shift sooner. I personally find shifting the power band around a waste of time when an awful lot of power cvan be had right up to redline. jlm, if you're reading, I certainly did not mean to insult you, not ever.
Michael
Originally Posted by BluMiniMe
No flame here Meb, and I apologize if this is simplistic
... but a gallon of 87 octane and a gallon of 100 octane have the same energy content. There is no more potential energy in 100 octane fuel. There actually might be less due to the additives necessary to raise the octane rating of gasoline. Higher octane fuel doesn't blow-up bigger than lower octane fuel. It may burn hotter once ignited though- I'm not sure?
Octane rating is a measurement of flashpoint... i.e. the temp at which a substance turns to vapor and is ready for burn once a heat source is applied (like a spark plug). (gasoline or any fuel will not burn in its liquid state.)
Raise the flashpoint of your fuel, you can raise the boost or compression ratio of your motor and be less prone to detonation.
High octane fuel serves only one purpose - prevent detonation/ping/knock. It removes the potential for detonation, so you can tune and build more power without hurting something.
ciao!
... but a gallon of 87 octane and a gallon of 100 octane have the same energy content. There is no more potential energy in 100 octane fuel. There actually might be less due to the additives necessary to raise the octane rating of gasoline. Higher octane fuel doesn't blow-up bigger than lower octane fuel. It may burn hotter once ignited though- I'm not sure? Octane rating is a measurement of flashpoint... i.e. the temp at which a substance turns to vapor and is ready for burn once a heat source is applied (like a spark plug). (gasoline or any fuel will not burn in its liquid state.)
Raise the flashpoint of your fuel, you can raise the boost or compression ratio of your motor and be less prone to detonation.
High octane fuel serves only one purpose - prevent detonation/ping/knock. It removes the potential for detonation, so you can tune and build more power without hurting something.
ciao!
Originally Posted by spillman
Now what does he mean it's too much? Is this from an effeciency stand point or catastrophic failure?
Well, until it stops making power.... why dont you guys try a 100% reduction pulley? Just take the damn thing off and stick the belt directly on the shaft
Originally Posted by JCampos
Efficiency. The blower can only spin so fast ya know
Well, until it stops making power.... why dont you guys try a 100% reduction pulley? Just take the damn thing off and stick the belt directly on the shaft 
Well, until it stops making power.... why dont you guys try a 100% reduction pulley? Just take the damn thing off and stick the belt directly on the shaft 
Originally Posted by JCampos
thus the, "well until it stops making power" part of that comment 

I know for sure (having seen comparison dyno charts) that the 19% makes a few more horses on top. However it makes more below redline. If a 23% was to only make the same amount of power on top but make a heck of a lot more getting there. I believe this would translate into a faster time slip at the drag strip. And also would be one heck of a torque monster on the street.
Originally Posted by JCampos
thus the, "well until it stops making power" part of that comment 


Spillman: While it might make some more torque on the low end, it would probably burn itself out on the high end. And we dont need specific charts or graphs to figure this out. Its physics. A sc can only spin so fast before it completley burns itself up.
Originally Posted by spillman
If a 23% was to only make the same amount of power on top but make a heck of a lot more getting there. I believe this would translate into a faster time slip at the drag strip. And also would be one heck of a torque monster on the street.
Originally Posted by greatgro
A torque monster - yes. An incredible daily driver - yes. Remember at the drag strip, lower RPMs only matter in first gear. Most of the 1/4 mile is done at 5500 RPMs+. You'd better have larger injectors and an ECU for that powerband. Besides the MINI already has more power with even a 19% from a standstill than traction (w/o LSD).
However I was at the drag strip today and it had rained a good bit. The track organizers were having us just cruise down the strip to dry it off. I got on it once and burned them off through sixth gear.... Was a little scary
Originally Posted by jlm
no problemo; i rarely run my car at redline, but may hit it once or twice at the dragstrip. After all, we are only talking about 500 rpm difference.
Originally Posted by jlm
I was drinking Luddite Languid Duck
The redline thing; I'm so use to driving 8,000-9,000 rpm Honda/Acura stuff that I forget how leisurely I can make power with the Mini - a wonderful change.
Michael
The 19% WILL make more power, until the extra heat catches up with it...at which point it will not make 'that' power until things cool down. And as Greatgro offered, larger injectors and some ECU work are beneficial...perhaps necessary.
Originally Posted by spillman
Well if there has been test then show me the data.
I know for sure (having seen comparison dyno charts) that the 19% makes a few more horses on top. However it makes more below redline. If a 23% was to only make the same amount of power on top but make a heck of a lot more getting there. I believe this would translate into a faster time slip at the drag strip. And also would be one heck of a torque monster on the street.
I know for sure (having seen comparison dyno charts) that the 19% makes a few more horses on top. However it makes more below redline. If a 23% was to only make the same amount of power on top but make a heck of a lot more getting there. I believe this would translate into a faster time slip at the drag strip. And also would be one heck of a torque monster on the street.
Seeing as this will be used on a drag strip and not road racing it will probably be OK. I know that just a 19% pulley used on a road race course with a long stragiht away will blow a head gasket.
This was documented already on a previous thread.
I say enjoy it while it lasts. You always wanted to see what was inside the engine anyway. Soon you will have an excuse to get inside and do some head work, maybe a little porting and polishing, bigger valves, get it onto a flow bench........ the possibilities are endless.
This was documented already on a previous thread.
I say enjoy it while it lasts. You always wanted to see what was inside the engine anyway. Soon you will have an excuse to get inside and do some head work, maybe a little porting and polishing, bigger valves, get it onto a flow bench........ the possibilities are endless.
Originally Posted by Bilbo-Baggins
Seeing as this will be used on a drag strip and not road racing it will probably be OK. I know that just a 19% pulley used on a road race course with a long stragiht away will blow a head gasket.
This was documented already on a previous thread.
I say enjoy it while it lasts. You always wanted to see what was inside the engine anyway. Soon you will have an excuse to get inside and do some head work, maybe a little porting and polishing, bigger valves, get it onto a flow bench........ the possibilities are endless.
This was documented already on a previous thread.
I say enjoy it while it lasts. You always wanted to see what was inside the engine anyway. Soon you will have an excuse to get inside and do some head work, maybe a little porting and polishing, bigger valves, get it onto a flow bench........ the possibilities are endless.
Originally Posted by XTREEM
I havnt seen any proof that the 19% blows head gaskets!!!! I think I seen one post somewhere about a head gasket but was it ever directly attributed to the pulley???? Did I miss something????? Or was it just the 15% boys slinging mud?
I also remeber the grassroots MINI blowing a head gasket. I think they were using the 19%. However I dont think they were using bigger injectors and they were using the stock intercooler also. I believe that more fuel and better cooling with the 19% could avoid this.
I did read one article
I've read in Grassroots Motorsports Magazine that they blew a headgasket using the 19% pulley. Here's a cached version from Google.
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:A...i+cooper&hl=en
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:A...i+cooper&hl=en
Originally Posted by XTREEM
I havnt seen any proof that the 19% blows head gaskets!!!! I think I seen one post somewhere about a head gasket but was it ever directly attributed to the pulley???? Did I miss something????? Or was it just the 15% boys slinging mud?
Originally Posted by Bilbo-Baggins
See the entry from "meanboy" he found what I could not remember the source of. This is it. Sounds valid, although not scientific. Certainly not the 15% boys slinging mud.
"It was indeed the headgasket. It's being replaced and we're replacing the 19% pulley with a stock one for the next two races to make sure that it doesn't blow again. Smaller supercharger pulleys are evidently not the hot ticket for road racing where straights (and full throttle acceleration) are measured in miles, not feet."
Would it be safe to assume that don't drive the same way as the GRM guys did since you don't have the larger injectors?
I wonder how what kind of pulley and injectors team Nuzzo uses. Anyone know?
I wonder how what kind of pulley and injectors team Nuzzo uses. Anyone know?
nuzzo runs a stock pulley, so I've been told.
if the head seriously overheats (from any problem), that can lead to permanent warpage and your head gasket will leak.
the extra boost that SPI has run (26psi) and others, indicates that the gasket can handle extra cylinder pressure.
On my mill project, I am replacing the head bolts with ARP to ensure it will be tight.
if the head seriously overheats (from any problem), that can lead to permanent warpage and your head gasket will leak.
the extra boost that SPI has run (26psi) and others, indicates that the gasket can handle extra cylinder pressure.
On my mill project, I am replacing the head bolts with ARP to ensure it will be tight.
Last edited by jlm; May 16, 2005 at 10:06 AM.


