Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R53) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain Fun with intercoolers and water sprayers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 06:39 PM
  #26  
greatgro's Avatar
greatgro
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by newbs49
dkstone
I understand what you are saying. But show me the numbers that would come from your car if it had a 19% pulley. I would have to think there would be more than a 2hp difference on your side with a 19% pulley installed ,not to say even more with injectors..
What's the difference? Why would you add the same mods to a JCW and then compare it to the aftermarket? It makes no sense. The thread is about the best bang for the buck. The JCW costs up to $6000+ installed yet a 19% pulley is around $400 (installed) and gives more torque!!! For under $1500 (19% pulley, intake and exhaust) you can not only blow away a JCW, but also someone with a 15% AND ECU which costs another $700-800. It's not Helix's fault that the JCW uses a bigger pulley. It just adds to the fact that Helix's pulley (the aftermarket part) is a much better bang for the buck than the JCW parts (JCW package).

But then again why would someone want bigger injectors on car that runs pig rich as it is. I could see bigger injectors with a big valve head,cam and headers.
The MCS likes lots of fuel to make power at the top end. With a 19% pulley, the injectors are maxed out. If you can add more fuel, you can take full advantage of all the extra boost the 19% provides at high RPM (plus keep temps down).
 
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2004 | 07:06 PM
  #27  
Ethereal's Avatar
Ethereal
2nd Gear
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
so would you recommend upgrading to 400cc injectors if you upgrade to a 19% pulley, MTH, intake and exhaust? Would it really be worth it? About heat temps, couldn't you just LOWER the rev limiter a bit so that the 19% doesn't cause too much heat? After all, with the 19% pulley the supercharger is at full boost before redline anyways...so it wouldn't hurt you performance wise...
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2004 | 06:33 AM
  #28  
greatgro's Avatar
greatgro
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by Ethereal
so would you recommend upgrading to 400cc injectors if you upgrade to a 19% pulley, MTH, intake and exhaust? Would it really be worth it? About heat temps, couldn't you just LOWER the rev limiter a bit so that the 19% doesn't cause too much heat? After all, with the 19% pulley the supercharger is at full boost before redline anyways...so it wouldn't hurt you performance wise...
Well since the MTH isn't tuned for a 19%, I wouldn't use that ECU with it. As far as the larger injectors being worth it, I think it would be. I currently am running the 19% without them and again, torque-wise, the difference between a 15% and 19% is night and day. But at the very top, the difference between the two is more subtle. As for the heat, the 19% doesn't cause too much heat. However, being that the S likes lots of fuel at the top end to make power, and there is tons of boost up there, more fuel will serve both purposes - more power and cooler temps. The 19% DOESN'T run too hot, but cooler is always better so why not add more fuel and get the best of both worlds.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 10:13 AM
  #29  
minimort's Avatar
minimort
5th Gear
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 1
From: Holden, MA
For the money then, is it better to get a custom dyno-tuned UniChip for the 19%, or just say some of the M7 400cc injectors / thermostat and perhaps a oil catch can as well?
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 12:51 PM
  #30  
62Lincoln's Avatar
62Lincoln
5th Gear
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 855
Likes: 1
Helix13, if and when you post the dyno's would you please also post the a/f curves? I'm new to the MINI, but I'm surprised that most of these conversations don't include a/f discussion. Part of it is also my ignorance of what works best for this engine, but past experience tells me that ignoring a/f in a supercharged engine should only be done at one's own peril.

edit: Could you also tell us how much timing the engines were running?
 

Last edited by 62Lincoln; Nov 11, 2004 at 03:47 PM. Reason: content
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 02:04 PM
  #31  
miniaq's Avatar
miniaq
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
What is this need for after market tuners to constantly label the jcw cars as over priced slow and not worthy? Frankly these foul cries based stricktly on commercial intrests are becoming very boring. You are in business to sell your product and that's fine. But why must you put down someone else's product?
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 02:10 PM
  #32  
Bisch's Avatar
Bisch
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by miniaq
What is this need for after market tuners to constantly label the jcw cars as over priced slow and not worthy? Frankly these foul cries based stricktly on commercial intrests are becoming very boring. You are in business to sell your product and that's fine. But why must you put down someone else's product?
I am not a tuner. I will say that JCW is over priced, not too slow, and not worthy of the cost/outcome result. That is my opinion. To many, the JCW label and warranty is worth the cost
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 02:44 PM
  #33  
miniaq's Avatar
miniaq
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Bisch
I am not a tuner. I will say that JCW is over priced, not too slow, and not worthy of the cost/outcome result. That is my opinion. To many, the JCW label and warranty is worth the cost
you missed the point, you didn't start a thread by promoting your product and bad mouthing someone else's. everyone is entitled to thier opinion, but the same "opinion" stated in different ways once every three days by a vendor against jcw product is negetive selling technique not an opinion.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 02:49 PM
  #34  
dhayashi's Avatar
dhayashi
2nd Gear
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: California
Isn't the optimal pulley size for the MTH the 17% - I think I've read in one of the threads that Franz recommends the 17% pulley after testing the different sizes. So I think he can accomodate a 19% if need be.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 02:52 PM
  #35  
greatgro's Avatar
greatgro
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by miniaq
you missed the point, you didn't start a thread by promoting your product and bad mouthing someone else's. everyone is entitled to thier opinion, but the same "opinion" stated in different ways once every three days by a vendor against jcw product is negetive selling technique not an opinion.
He didn't start the thread by bad-mouthing someone else's product. There were questions about the JCW that fueled it. Remember, it is a free country people can bash whatever they want. You could always choose NOT to participate in the thread. Of course since it's a free country, you could always complain about JCW bashing also. I personally stay away from off-topic, for example, b/c I don't want to start arguing over non-MINI issues with MINI people.
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 02:56 PM
  #36  
greatgro's Avatar
greatgro
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,359
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by miniaq
What is this need for after market tuners to constantly label the jcw cars as over priced slow and not worthy? Frankly these foul cries based stricktly on commercial intrests are becoming very boring. You are in business to sell your product and that's fine. But why must you put down someone else's product?
Gee I think the same would be the case in any industry. Especially when there's such a discrepancy. I'm in the Nutrition industry. If I developed a protein supplement that was twice the quality as company X's product yet I offered it for 1/3 the price, I'd have a hard time not talking about it too. Whether I was talking to industry people or my neighbor!
 
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 03:52 PM
  #37  
miniaq's Avatar
miniaq
2nd Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by greatgro
He didn't start the thread by bad-mouthing someone else's product. There were questions about the JCW that fueled it. Remember, it is a free country people can bash whatever they want. You could always choose NOT to participate in the thread. Of course since it's a free country, you could always complain about JCW bashing also. I personally stay away from off-topic, for example, b/c I don't want to start arguing over non-MINI issues with MINI people.
go back and read the original thread and you'll see otherwise. I'm wondering if the fact that you display and promote your helix 19% pulley has anything to do with your biass and lack of undrestanding my point!
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
patsum
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
26
May 29, 2021 06:29 PM
rob76turbo
JCW Garage
1
Sep 15, 2015 10:11 AM
OutMotoring
Drivetrain (Cooper S)
5
Sep 8, 2015 06:27 AM
rob76turbo
GP Talk (2006)
2
Sep 7, 2015 12:28 PM
Mini Mania
Drivetrain Products
0
Sep 1, 2015 04:39 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:44 AM.