Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R56) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain Motor Disassembly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 02:38 PM
  #51  
countryboyshane's Avatar
countryboyshane
6th Gear
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 8
From: Bloomfield, MI
Originally Posted by Mike@Tech Division
That's the first time I've seen the CP piston and it does seem odd. I believe the CP piston was based off the MCS 10.4:1 piston and was brought down to 9.5:1. Possible they assumed it was a normal piston and simply left the cup out. I'm not sure who was involved in the design, I just know it was available after Hubie had the rods spec'd. The JE pistons Hubie spec'd out have the corrected cup for the DI.

JE piston pic borrowed from "mrrjm" build thread
That's what I'm talking about! Very shallow bowl but essentially a copy of the Mahle piston crown.

What kind of numbers have the ABF guys been seeing with these pistons in higher boost applications?
 
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 11:32 PM
  #52  
Mike@Tech Division's Avatar
Mike@Tech Division
Former Vendor
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 436
Likes: 2
From: Garden Grove, CA
Originally Posted by countryboyshane
That's what I'm talking about! Very shallow bowl but essentially a copy of the Mahle piston crown.

What kind of numbers have the ABF guys been seeing with these pistons in higher boost applications?
The only set I know of in use is in mrrjm car and I've yet to see numbers from his car. Hubie may have sold more, but I can't be certain. TBH they should be just as reliable as the ones he had made for the R53 that saw 600+ whp.

The CP piston is probably decent strength wise and very comparable to the JE, but there is the matter of that missing cup.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 12:06 AM
  #53  
fupac133's Avatar
fupac133
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Cylinder Port

Contaminated cylinder heads when pistons broke
 
Attached Thumbnails Motor Disassembly-cylinderport.jpg   Motor Disassembly-cylinderport2.jpg   Motor Disassembly-cylinderport3.jpg  

Last edited by fupac133; Aug 22, 2012 at 12:12 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 12:08 AM
  #54  
fupac133's Avatar
fupac133
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Pics of combustion chamber and intake port
 
Attached Thumbnails Motor Disassembly-combustionchamber.jpg   Motor Disassembly-intakeports.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 01:40 PM
  #55  
czar's Avatar
czar
4th Gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 506
Likes: 30
From: UK
Originally Posted by Mike@Tech Division
The CP piston is probably decent strength wise and very comparable to the JE, but there is the matter of that missing cup.
Have to agree ^^^ but without the wall guide, there is no way to control the injected fuel, nor to place the fuel charge mix in the precise position of the pent roof chamber, and the central position of the piston crown, to optimise the ignition charge!

Furthermore without the exhaust valve relief step, you are going to encounter valve/piston contact, from what I can see from your image of the pistons you have selected, unless the centre – centre height has been re-calculated to take into consideration of the known valve lift (9.5mm) and subsequently engineered into the piston/connecting rod package.

But I doubt this is the case, and those pistons in the image are wrong, for the intended use.

 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 07:10 PM
  #56  
fupac133's Avatar
fupac133
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Rod and Piston comparison. Stock vs Carillo
 
Attached Thumbnails Motor Disassembly-rodcomparison.jpg   Motor Disassembly-rodcomparison2.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2012 | 05:04 AM
  #57  
countryboyshane's Avatar
countryboyshane
6th Gear
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 8
From: Bloomfield, MI
What did Carillo say about those piston crowns?
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2012 | 08:28 AM
  #58  
fupac133's Avatar
fupac133
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
The intakes reliefs are very visible on the new pistons. We decided to choose a lower compression piston, there for the dish is larger. That is how lower compression is accomplished, by a deeper "dished" piston. Since the original exhaust valve reliefs were very small to start with, the additional new deeper cut dish removes the need/sign of the exhaust relief. This missing exhaust reliefs are very common with lower compression pistons and exactly signifies the piston is indeed lower compression as spec'd.
 
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2012 | 08:52 AM
  #59  
czar's Avatar
czar
4th Gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 506
Likes: 30
From: UK
Originally Posted by fupac133
The intakes reliefs are very visible on the new pistons. We decided to choose a lower compression piston, there for the dish is larger. That is how lower compression is accomplished, by a deeper "dished" piston. Since the original exhaust valve reliefs were very small to start with, the additional new deeper cut dish removes the need/sign of the exhaust relief. This missing exhaust reliefs are very common with lower compression pistons and exactly signifies the piston is indeed lower compression as spec'd.
Thank you for your explanation, however a few of us, are quite familiar with the concept, so you've selected dished crowns a static CR of 9.5:1 what is your solution to controlling the air/fuel tumbling mix, from not having a combustion wall guide ? And with a lower than desirable volume charge pressure, how will that effect the ignition control ?
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2012 | 07:18 AM
  #60  
Porthos's Avatar
Porthos
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,455
Likes: 14
From: None yours!
Why would you lower the compression? Do you plan on cranking the boost up?
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2012 | 05:26 AM
  #61  
tominizer's Avatar
tominizer
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 403
Likes: 3
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Subscribed. I love this stuff
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2012 | 02:30 PM
  #62  
Engineerd's Avatar
Engineerd
Neutral
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
This is one of the most interesting threads I've read in a long time. I'm curious though about all the failures some of you have experienced with your,stage three tunes. I'm assuming stage three entails the upgrading the fmic, exhaust/intake and engine tune. This has me a little nervous as these are all the same mods that I've performed on my 2007 MCS.

How did u all perform these upgrades without upgrading the fuel delivery systems (i.e. injectors, high pressure pump, etc...).

Thanks for posting the details on your build. Will be watching with great anticipation!
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2012 | 07:01 PM
  #63  
texasmontego's Avatar
texasmontego
4th Gear
15 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 546
Likes: 56
From: Denver, CO
I agree! This has to be the best thread in a long time. I'm very interested in the bottom line cost to rebuild to this level. I was just telling a friend this week that it would be fun to build a high HP and reliable Mini engine.
Can't wait for the updates.
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 12:45 PM
  #64  
Ginvent's Avatar
Ginvent
2nd Gear
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville NC
time to sit and watch!
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 05:43 PM
  #65  
2009R56JCW's Avatar
2009R56JCW
4th Gear
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 493
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Lower compression combined with a larger turbo = huge lag.
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 06:35 PM
  #66  
Porthos's Avatar
Porthos
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,455
Likes: 14
From: None yours!
Originally Posted by 2009R56JCW
Lower compression combined with a larger turbo = huge lag.
Yeah but, you destroke it and rev it up higher means more boost. Yes less tq though.
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2012 | 09:42 PM
  #67  
1bigpea's Avatar
1bigpea
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 429
Likes: 2
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by Porthos
Please take that stupid noise maker off your firewall before you reinstall the engine. Other than that I hate that your engine blew but, I am glad to see how you are improving things under the hood.
What's the noise maker and which part of the firewall is it? Thx.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 06:48 AM
  #68  
2009R56JCW's Avatar
2009R56JCW
4th Gear
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 493
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Porthos
Yeah but, you destroke it and rev it up higher means more boost. Yes less tq though.

destroking means having a one off crank built for build then you need to
come up with new valvetrain components and cylinder head mods to handle the higher rpm.

For a street/trackrat tq is king.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 12:31 PM
  #69  
Porthos's Avatar
Porthos
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,455
Likes: 14
From: None yours!
Originally Posted by 1bigpea
What's the noise maker and which part of the firewall is it? Thx.
You don't have to worry about it they took it out in the 2011 Cooper S and Countrymans.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 09:52 PM
  #70  
1bigpea's Avatar
1bigpea
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 429
Likes: 2
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by Porthos
You don't have to worry about it they took it out in the 2011 Cooper S and Countrymans.
Good. After researching what it is...I'm glad it doesn't exist on my vehicles.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2012 | 12:53 PM
  #71  
Elessar's Avatar
Elessar
2nd Gear
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Update?

Any more info on this build? Just curious how things have been going.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2012 | 02:07 PM
  #72  
fupac133's Avatar
fupac133
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Sorry haven't update you guys for a while. I just got the car back. The car feels strong for not running any tune. Once I break in the motor will upload the stage 4 tune. Will dyno the car and post results.
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2012 | 02:12 PM
  #73  
countryboyshane's Avatar
countryboyshane
6th Gear
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 8
From: Bloomfield, MI
WOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOO! Keep us posted :-)
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2012 | 07:15 AM
  #74  
minikr56's Avatar
minikr56
1st Gear
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Im also about to start to rebuilt my engine and I have a quick question... Would it be bad to just change the pistons and not the rods? From what I have read, the pistons are the weak point not the rods.

Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2012 | 07:33 AM
  #75  
fupac133's Avatar
fupac133
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Yes that is correct. You can just change the pistons and not the rods.

Originally Posted by minikr56
Im also about to start to rebuilt my engine and I have a quick question... Would it be bad to just change the pistons and not the rods? From what I have read, the pistons are the weak point not the rods.

Thanks.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:18 AM.