Drivetrain It's all fun till someone loses a piston
#51
#52
So anybody increasing power, no matter how you go about this, you are introducing extra unwanted uncontrollable HEAT, and unless you've taken necessary precautionary steps to combat this, then your asking for trouble and eventually it will and here in this thread is proof, end in tears and lots of $$$ of which you should have spent as a preventative insurance in the first place!
I'm sorry if I seem to be ranting on, maybe I am, as I am frustrated with the way folks go about looking to blame anyone and everyone including components, tunes, tuners, when in reality you should be looking directly at yourselves, as you yourself are the one to blame.
I really can't see why when you have a limited budget, you want to even see what stock components limits are, and then moan like a ***** when it all goes wrong, if you want power go about it correctly and build for it, remembering that POWER = HEAT and uncontrolled HEAT will kill your engine.
But from the consumer point of view, they see an assumed "brand" name on NAM offering a devise for power they jump at it, assuming it is "safe" to use. But in this instance, we are talking about a sizeable jumpin boost and therefore as czar put it = heat which can increase the probability of destroying an engine. I also say the vendors do not adequately convey the risks attached to the purchase decision. They are in the market to make money and sell the product knowing full well the risks can be higher than most deem exceptable.
I believe that both the sellers of HP maximizing products and the consumers of these products have some form of cupability, maybe it is moral.., but for some it is financial.
What about Mini? I think they have built an unreliable car and encouraged modding. They certainly did not put in much of a tolerance level in either their design or their manufacturer of the car. But are they to blame for overheated and blown engines which have go faster boosted parts? Who knows. Guess some people will test that as well.
Some food for thought.
#53
WOW,as I have stated in previous posts, here is an example of "over modding" and its results pushing it to the max..Power crazed on a stock MCS. craziness
#55
An independent could start in the 2k range most likely and move up from there. Depends on the type of repair utilized.
#56
#57
#58
Water/meth injection is certainly effective at controlling detonation, I'm sure your all aware of the benefits of reducing air intake charge temperatures, I don't think we need to discuss that here in this thread.
However you all must be aware that what we see on our gauges monitoring water and oil temp, is not how hot our engines are actually running, those are simply the fluid temps!
Engine core and cylinder head temps are way different, and anybody that monitors EGT's and cylinder firing temps will know what I'm talking about.
So anybody increasing power, no matter how you go about this, you are introducing extra unwanted uncontrollable HEAT, and unless you've taken necessary precautionary steps to combat this, then your asking for trouble and eventually it will and here in this thread is proof, end in tears and lots of $$$ of which you should have spent as a preventative insurance in the first place!
I'm sorry if I seem to be ranting on, maybe I am, as I am frustrated with the way folks go about looking to blame anyone and everyone including components, tunes, tuners, when in reality you should be looking directly at yourselves, as you yourself are the one to blame.
I really can't see why when you have a limited budget, you want to even see what stock components limits are, and then moan like a ***** when it all goes wrong, if you want power go about it correctly and build for it, remembering that POWER = HEAT and uncontrolled HEAT will kill your engine.
However you all must be aware that what we see on our gauges monitoring water and oil temp, is not how hot our engines are actually running, those are simply the fluid temps!
Engine core and cylinder head temps are way different, and anybody that monitors EGT's and cylinder firing temps will know what I'm talking about.
So anybody increasing power, no matter how you go about this, you are introducing extra unwanted uncontrollable HEAT, and unless you've taken necessary precautionary steps to combat this, then your asking for trouble and eventually it will and here in this thread is proof, end in tears and lots of $$$ of which you should have spent as a preventative insurance in the first place!
I'm sorry if I seem to be ranting on, maybe I am, as I am frustrated with the way folks go about looking to blame anyone and everyone including components, tunes, tuners, when in reality you should be looking directly at yourselves, as you yourself are the one to blame.
I really can't see why when you have a limited budget, you want to even see what stock components limits are, and then moan like a ***** when it all goes wrong, if you want power go about it correctly and build for it, remembering that POWER = HEAT and uncontrolled HEAT will kill your engine.
Last edited by Octane; 06-09-2011 at 11:14 PM.
#60
98 octane in Europe is the same as 93 in the US.....(from what I recall...)
#61
folks, at the risk of pointing out the obvious, this thread is a related read:
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...nd-rods-1.html
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...nd-rods-1.html
#62
Looks like great advise but can you tell us what we can do to control the heat. I think alot of Mini owners have a limted bubget and building a complete engine is a good solution but not in the budget for most. Are there things that you can advise to reduce heat that would allow for moderate HP & torque gains with safety or do you think that NO TUNING should be done on the MCS and factory JCW?
When I realized I had something wrong, I was sitting there at a stoplight....I instantly thought "oh god, it finally happened... " Then I got home, pulled my plugs...and #3 was covered in oil, and then I knew...yes it finally did happen.
I always felt it was bound to happen, especially after I put the JCW turbo on. While I agree with czar 110% on most everything he says...he does make it sound like you can't do anything to the car and not expect it to break. This shouldn't be the case, but unfortunately, this seems to be true with the R56. People with simple tunes are blowing motors...its kind of ridiculous in my opinion. Especially when you hear of stock motors seeing the same failure.
Coming from the VW/Audi world...people can run 20 psi all day long and not break pistons. I will stand by my thinking that these motors are junk....the threshold should not be that close. People should be blowing turbos before they are blowing motors. No one on here has done anything that drastic to where they should be blowing motors as much as people are. Maybe with a turbo swap it's understandable...but I don't know many people that have. You have the few and far between GT28RS guys that can't get it to work right long enough to even see if the motor can take it. And other than that you have a few people running the Alta billet turbo or other various reworked K03 based turbos...but they haven't been running long enough to see failure. I ran the JCW turbo for about 10k before I lost a piston...and about 30k miles tuned on the stock turbo prior to that.
As far as keeping things cool in the motor...the obvious are FMIC and water/meth. They both will help, but this will not cover up an inherent poor design and the fact that you are doubling the amount of boost (read:heat & stress) the motor was designed to see.
Last edited by ThumperMCS; 06-10-2011 at 01:35 AM.
#63
On wikipedia i found the table:
98RON = 93–94AKI
95RON = 90-91AKI
Still, ALTA maps are optimized for 91AKI (95ron) On my cooper S 184hp manual it is written to use always 98ron/94aki octane fuel!
#64
As czar stated at his previous post, EGT and cylinder firing temps are the most interesting info which can tell you how much heat the motor is experiencing.
Having said that I should add that my EGTs with the JCW kit software were in the 1000oC range. That was pretty much the reason for a badly cracked stock MCS turbo back then. After the addition of a DP and a FMIC the EGTs stayed merely the same. But after the software tuning, which tends to run richer than stock, the EGTs dropped to 940oC even with higher than stock boost!
So:
DP+FMIC+JCW kit tune= 1000oC (0,9bar)
DP+FMIC+custom tune= 940oC (1,3bar)
All of that is always on 100RON.
However, after 10k of the above configuration I do have slight leakage on cylinders 2,3 and 4
My compression test and leak down test showed:
No. 1 cylinder 12,5bar/181psi (no leakage)
No. 2 cylinder 12,1bar/175psi (leaks)
No. 3 cylinder 11,8bar/171psi (leaks)
No. 4 cylinder 12,0bar/174psi (leaks)
And you can noticeably hear piston slap, when cold.
So, I am assuming this is the beginning of the end...?
Having said that I should add that my EGTs with the JCW kit software were in the 1000oC range. That was pretty much the reason for a badly cracked stock MCS turbo back then. After the addition of a DP and a FMIC the EGTs stayed merely the same. But after the software tuning, which tends to run richer than stock, the EGTs dropped to 940oC even with higher than stock boost!
So:
DP+FMIC+JCW kit tune= 1000oC (0,9bar)
DP+FMIC+custom tune= 940oC (1,3bar)
All of that is always on 100RON.
However, after 10k of the above configuration I do have slight leakage on cylinders 2,3 and 4
My compression test and leak down test showed:
No. 1 cylinder 12,5bar/181psi (no leakage)
No. 2 cylinder 12,1bar/175psi (leaks)
No. 3 cylinder 11,8bar/171psi (leaks)
No. 4 cylinder 12,0bar/174psi (leaks)
And you can noticeably hear piston slap, when cold.
So, I am assuming this is the beginning of the end...?
#65
I think your statement is a little unfair in this situation because 99% of the people that want “power” simply want a tune to make the car what it should have been from the factory. The people that do “build” their engines (pistons, rods, cams, etc, etc) have all been educated enough to know “you pay to play”.
The “POWER” that these tunes produce for the most part don’t create enough “HEAT” if used properly. (thus the reason why Alta sends you Stage I, Stage II and Stage III maps)
Now, if the end users takes a more aggressive map like a stage III when they should be using a Stage I, then I believe it’s definitely the customer’s choice and they must suffer the consequences.
However, I think in this situation, the mini owner with a stock engine that wants a bit more out of it with a tune isn’t asking for anything ridiculous. It would be no different than Mini selling the Stage I JCW kit.
I think if you buy a tune from a tuner, they have some responsibility of making sure it’s “safe” (which in my opinion, they all do... it wouldn’t behoove any one of our tuners to produce a tune that would be unbelievably aggressive only to have it blow someone’s engine up... they’d be in business for a very short period of time)
The tuners know that most people that get a tune have ZERO idea of what they’re doing. They simply plug in a tool and like magic, the car is faster.
Mark
#66
As czar stated at his previous post, EGT and cylinder firing temps are the most interesting info which can tell you how much heat the motor is experiencing.
Having said that I should add that my EGTs with the JCW kit software were in the 1000oC range. That was pretty much the reason for a badly cracked stock MCS turbo back then. After the addition of a DP and a FMIC the EGTs stayed merely the same. But after the software tuning, which tends to run richer than stock, the EGTs dropped to 940oC even with higher than stock boost!
So:
DP+FMIC+JCW kit tune= 1000oC (0,9bar)
DP+FMIC+custom tune= 940oC (1,3bar)
Having said that I should add that my EGTs with the JCW kit software were in the 1000oC range. That was pretty much the reason for a badly cracked stock MCS turbo back then. After the addition of a DP and a FMIC the EGTs stayed merely the same. But after the software tuning, which tends to run richer than stock, the EGTs dropped to 940oC even with higher than stock boost!
So:
DP+FMIC+JCW kit tune= 1000oC (0,9bar)
DP+FMIC+custom tune= 940oC (1,3bar)
If you’re having wear issues, I’d guess that even though the EGT’s were higher with the JCW kit, the tune was still safer.
I’ll bet that even though the EGT’s were lower with a custom tune, the tune was still too aggressive. (too much timing, too much boost, too much something and eventually took it’s toll and wore parts out prematurely)
The JCW Stage I kit is as “safe” as it gets. Mini isn’t going to put out a tune that is overly aggressive if they have to warranty the engine.
Mark
#67
#68
The JCW Stage I tunes are very mild. Like I mentioned earlier, Mini isn’t going to produce a “performance” tune overly aggressive if they have to warranty it.
So unless there is a hidden/unknown problem with manufactured parts, I’d say you’re pretty safe.
Mark
#69
My query is,how come the JCW kit software or even the stock MCS software is producing MORE HEAT with LESS BOOST than a custom tune does?
And how is that safer in terms of EGTs?
I guess that the stock tune and JCW stage 1 is running more lean together with more aggressive timing (for emission purposes) than a custom tune.
Remember, my car was bone stock with 25000km on it when I installed the JCW kit and prior installation we found out about the cracked exhaust manifold and the cracked turbo.
I don't know myself, I am a little bit confused...
And how is that safer in terms of EGTs?
I guess that the stock tune and JCW stage 1 is running more lean together with more aggressive timing (for emission purposes) than a custom tune.
Remember, my car was bone stock with 25000km on it when I installed the JCW kit and prior installation we found out about the cracked exhaust manifold and the cracked turbo.
I don't know myself, I am a little bit confused...
#70
I'm currently at work and extremely busy, however I will enlighten you all when I get time later today, as to why these engines build so much heat, and why it's also very very important to understand what this means in terms of tuning and reliability!
I will start a fresh thread with this info.
See you lot later.
I will start a fresh thread with this info.
See you lot later.
#72
My query is,how come the JCW kit software or even the stock MCS software is producing MORE HEAT with LESS BOOST than a custom tune does?
And how is that safer in terms of EGTs?
I guess that the stock tune and JCW stage 1 is running more lean together with more aggressive timing (for emission purposes) than a custom tune.
Remember, my car was bone stock with 25000km on it when I installed the JCW kit and prior installation we found out about the cracked exhaust manifold and the cracked turbo.
I don't know myself, I am a little bit confused...
And how is that safer in terms of EGTs?
I guess that the stock tune and JCW stage 1 is running more lean together with more aggressive timing (for emission purposes) than a custom tune.
Remember, my car was bone stock with 25000km on it when I installed the JCW kit and prior installation we found out about the cracked exhaust manifold and the cracked turbo.
I don't know myself, I am a little bit confused...
#73
I currently have a DoS CAI and whenever Way gets them in stock will have a Forge FMIC installed. I'm not looking for horsepower now, just a cooler more efficient engine. Whenever Alta supports the 2011's, I plan on buying an Access Port along with a turboback (possibly Alta's 3") and only running stage 1 (maybe 2 a time or two just for the experience). With these mods and running top-tier 93 octane and discounting the possibility of flawed OEM parts, should I really expect things to break?
Last edited by Melangell; 06-10-2011 at 09:15 AM. Reason: cause I sounded like an idiot...
#74
I'm currently at work and extremely busy, however I will enlighten you all when I get time later today, as to why these engines build so much heat, and why it's also very very important to understand what this means in terms of tuning and reliability!
I will start a fresh thread with this info.
See you lot later.
I will start a fresh thread with this info.
See you lot later.
#75