Drivetrain Changing intercoolers! An Alta TMIC to an M7 version2 DFIC
I choose M7 because I have seen and used their products which are innovative and extremely well designed. I wanted to have a car that is solid and capable without jeopardizing the reliability. I have talked with their techs who have helped me for countless occasions during all of my mini modding and happy to do so even if the mod or question isn't M7 related. They are honest, focused and will tell you when and if you don't need something. The founder is a second generation mini racer from the old mini days who is dedicated to the perfection of the Mini Cooper and knows the car inside and out with tons of experience. I know If I get something from those guys its solid, top notch and worry free. Its good stuff. Take the intercooler for example, the first front mount and still the best.
of course in my opinion
of course in my opinion
He don't know them very well do he...............!
HA HAhh...popcorn
at anyrate, Cradin Industries does some good stuff. If i get new headers or a new water-air intercooler, they will have coatings from those guys.
at anyrate, Cradin Industries does some good stuff. If i get new headers or a new water-air intercooler, they will have coatings from those guys.
Last edited by nabeshin; Nov 11, 2007 at 01:24 AM.
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
From: Anacortes Washington
Where did I get all that from?
I ask alot of questions! and talk to alot of people. I did alot of research.
I ask alot of questions! and talk to alot of people. I did alot of research.
Last edited by ClintTheMiniOwner; Nov 13, 2007 at 07:32 PM.
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
From: Anacortes Washington
I want to somehow attach a video of the cars acceleration so you can hear how fast my car winds up, even with those long 2002 gears.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/2069746...n/photostream/
http://flickr.com/photos/20697468@N0...n/photostream/
If you want, check out this pic with a giant bus and my mini.
http://flickr.com/photos/20697468@N0...n/photostream/
Last edited by ClintTheMiniOwner; Nov 13, 2007 at 07:38 PM.
Nothing like playing with a persons words....
Ya'll know what the DFIC is and does...
But wow Clint, the way you expound about M7, sure does sound like you drank at the M7 fountain, ever think of writing ad copy?. If it works for you..good on ya
Ya'll know what the DFIC is and does...
But wow Clint, the way you expound about M7, sure does sound like you drank at the M7 fountain, ever think of writing ad copy?. If it works for you..good on ya
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
From: Anacortes Washington
Also...It could be a story, but I recently heard that the three cars with the most horsepower at a tuning party in Atlanta all had M7 DFIC's and made over 230 wheel horsepower.
Last edited by ClintTheMiniOwner; Nov 13, 2007 at 08:24 PM.
2 had them. the hp that was created had nothing to do with the dfic.
I had the car in Atlanta with the DFIC 2 on it. I think mine is the second one only because of a shipping issue I am inpressed withe build quality and the lighter weight..... as far as pressure loss I was achieving 15 -15.5 so I don't see any.... I told Peter that I do not have the "tools" right now to do measurements so I am not going to post..... I think " a complete" watse of money is a bit strong..... when i did have a measurement device the DFIC 1 was by far the best at cooling of the 4 I tried..... all know that A2A ICs are impossible to dyno without a controlled environment.... and wind tunnel time is beyond my budget....
Yeah I took a good long hard look at it and compared it to the one that came off the car that Waylen loaned Jan for the day. The design of the v2 is far improved over the original. I'm still not entirely sold on the flow through design. With my piddly little car experience (which has absolutely no engineering training) I'd rather see a thinner core with more surface area to the ambient air coming in.
What's funny is when at the end of the day when Dane's car was on the dyno I was standing there with Jim and I just asked him casually. "You're a racing engineer. What do you think of all the inter coolers you've seen today." His response was there doesn't seem to be a one size fits all. More importantly it would totally depend on where the balance of pressure drop, thermal efficiency and recovery were.
Haha didn't answer my question at all... but it did reinforce some of the things that the good dr. o has been preaching.
What's funny is when at the end of the day when Dane's car was on the dyno I was standing there with Jim and I just asked him casually. "You're a racing engineer. What do you think of all the inter coolers you've seen today." His response was there doesn't seem to be a one size fits all. More importantly it would totally depend on where the balance of pressure drop, thermal efficiency and recovery were.
Haha didn't answer my question at all... but it did reinforce some of the things that the good dr. o has been preaching.
Yeah I took a good long hard look at it and compared it to the one that came off the car that Waylen loaned Jan for the day. The design of the v2 is far improved over the original. I'm still not entirely sold on the flow through design. With my piddly little car experience (which has absolutely no engineering training) I'd rather see a thinner core with more surface area to the ambient air coming in.
What's funny is when at the end of the day when Dane's car was on the dyno I was standing there with Jim and I just asked him casually. "You're a racing engineer. What do you think of all the inter coolers you've seen today." His response was there doesn't seem to be a one size fits all. More importantly it would totally depend on where the balance of pressure drop, thermal efficiency and recovery were.
Haha didn't answer my question at all... but it did reinforce some of the things that the good dr. o has been preaching.
What's funny is when at the end of the day when Dane's car was on the dyno I was standing there with Jim and I just asked him casually. "You're a racing engineer. What do you think of all the inter coolers you've seen today." His response was there doesn't seem to be a one size fits all. More importantly it would totally depend on where the balance of pressure drop, thermal efficiency and recovery were.
Haha didn't answer my question at all... but it did reinforce some of the things that the good dr. o has been preaching.

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
From: Anacortes Washington
http://www.flickr.com/photos/20697468@N04/
Here is my updated intercooler gallery. It shows the included hood scoop as well.
Here is my updated intercooler gallery. It shows the included hood scoop as well.
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
From: Anacortes Washington
Its funny how the highest horsepower cars that day had M7 DFIC's, they must be doing something right...What a coinsidence!
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
You can convince yourself the IC is improving the performance of your car, but until you provide measurable evidence, you're prognostications are going to viewed skeptically, at best.
And remember, I'm one of the guys publishing data on this IC efficiency thing--so I know what's measurable, and what's not. Dynos are not places to measure IC performance, period.
no way possible to articulate what I was thinking better then how dr. phil said it. Especially since he knows, 1000000000000000x more about cooling the intake path of the r53 then I ever will.
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
From: Anacortes Washington
Unfortunately, given the conditions of a dyno, it's almost certain the ICs had little, if nothing, to do with the HP data collected. I saw some photos, and while there was a 8" or thereabouts flexpipe blowing air on the ICs, this in no way simulates the airflow you'd experience on the highway with the bonnet closed and a big scoop directing air to the IC, whichever that happens to be.
You can convince yourself the IC is improving the performance of your car, but until you provide measurable evidence, you're prognostications are going to viewed skeptically, at best.
And remember, I'm one of the guys publishing data on this IC efficiency thing--so I know what's measurable, and what's not. Dynos are not places to measure IC performance, period.
You can convince yourself the IC is improving the performance of your car, but until you provide measurable evidence, you're prognostications are going to viewed skeptically, at best.
And remember, I'm one of the guys publishing data on this IC efficiency thing--so I know what's measurable, and what's not. Dynos are not places to measure IC performance, period.
Don't knock it untill you try it!!!
Last edited by ClintTheMiniOwner; Nov 14, 2007 at 03:35 PM.

'Cuz I owned it, I measured it, I compared it, & I sold it.
My little dose of LITHIUM
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,435
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque New Mexico
Sounds fair, but I actually run the DFIC, and have thermocouples in the inlet and outlet of it that measure temps and deltas in real time. My measurements show that the variance in all temperature-related elements of the intake in our cars is so high that it's unlikely any relevant hypothesis for a change would be found statistically significant. When someone says that their IATs were 5F lower, on average, that's not going to be statistically different from 0F in the world we live, and I have data to back that claim up. So, you say, how big a delta in IATs would it have to be to be statistically significant, and although there's no definite answer to that question, it's going to have to be of the order of maginitude 20F or more in my estimation. Now, I know of no IC that has ever produced average IATs of that magnitude lower than the stocker, especially over varied conditions. I've posted some pretty impressive approach numbers (approach = ambient - IAT), as has PARTSMAN and a few others, but honestly they were in the "best case scenario" category. For me, my best performance data were generated during my last track day with an ambient of around 85F.
What data logging has highlighted for me is:
1. There is so much variance that the butt dyno is a useless instrument with which to measure performance.
2. There are so many variables to deal with that we are all pretty much shooting in the dark.
Which leads me to a more relevant conclusion: Your new DFIC is probably not harming the performance of your car under most circumstances, but it's unlikely to be adding significantly to the performance under all conditions. However, that said, there are probably other ways to spend the dollars you spent on the DFIC that produce substantially more impact on the performance of your MINI under most conditions. (and given the mods on your car, I'm not meaning *your* car, I'm meaning a MINI in general.)
What data logging has highlighted for me is:
1. There is so much variance that the butt dyno is a useless instrument with which to measure performance.
2. There are so many variables to deal with that we are all pretty much shooting in the dark.
Which leads me to a more relevant conclusion: Your new DFIC is probably not harming the performance of your car under most circumstances, but it's unlikely to be adding significantly to the performance under all conditions. However, that said, there are probably other ways to spend the dollars you spent on the DFIC that produce substantially more impact on the performance of your MINI under most conditions. (and given the mods on your car, I'm not meaning *your* car, I'm meaning a MINI in general.)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
From: Anacortes Washington
Cool, I was just thinking it is 39 degrees here right now and it has been much colder since I have owned it, I did also get the areo gel heat shields, hood scoop and stuff which werent around when I was driving with the Alta and stock. I have yet to try it on a hot day...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



