Drivetrain Revolution Mini Works (Jan) tuning in Atlanta November 10th
I love how people always try to throw the carb thing in to a conversation about efficiency.. LOL... like states like Maryland and Cali are the soul reason we should ignore the best way to do something... yep... that makes total sence
I love how some people just don't get the point. What people do with their own cars is their business. The point is that a business that provides parts and services has to adhere to these laws and advise customers accordingly. There are too many instances where people purchase cars and then can not register them for street use. This results in a huge financial disaster for these individuals especially if they're young with limited resources. Get it now Tuls? BTW,have you ever considered spell check? How about reading a book or something.
BD
Give it a break. Play in your own world. For some reason if we don't agree with you we're dumb or whatever. People can make their choices for whatever they want to do in life. Play in your buddies own forum.
Give it a break. Play in your own world. For some reason if we don't agree with you we're dumb or whatever. People can make their choices for whatever they want to do in life. Play in your buddies own forum.
I love how some people just don't get the point. What people do with their own cars is their business. The point is that a business that provides parts and services has to adhere to these laws and advise customers accordingly. There are too many instances where people purchase cars and then can not register them for street use. This results in a huge financial disaster for these individuals especially if they're young with limited resources. Get it now Tuls? BTW,have you ever considered spell check? How about reading a book or something.
And I also think your alittle bitter because no one wants to deal with you from this site with that attitude of yours and the fact you limit your tune to certain mods.
Thats not a tuner. Do you see GIAC or UNICHIP limiting there software to certain mods, no.Im not a violent person and this is the internet , but if i was in your shop and you spoke me the way you just did to TULS, you'd be eating your teeth.
And speaking of the comment you made to him. Read the site guidlines if you plan on staying here.

your posts never cease to amaze me. The reality of it is... people are going to do what people are going to do. From my perspective it's their cars... they are going to do whatever they want. I mean... you can make suggestions, but in the end it's still their investment. the funny thing is I agree with a lot of things that you say, with regards to car tuning theory... you're just so condescending I can't possibly agree with you.
Last edited by minimusprime; Nov 16, 2007 at 05:35 AM.
I think you just hit the nail on the head... That and the controversy at the dragon, where he just did off the shelf tunes because they forgot the maps at the shop, or so i heard... He can't match Jan's results and success, and he chooses to vent his envy by bashing other vendors....
I love how some people just don't get the point. What people do with their own cars is their business. The point is that a business that provides parts and services has to adhere to these laws and advise customers accordingly. There are too many instances where people purchase cars and then can not register them for street use. This results in a huge financial disaster for these individuals especially if they're young with limited resources. Get it now Tuls? BTW,have you ever considered spell check? How about reading a book or something.
Why would you say that to Tuls???
Lets put things into perspective. I am currently in Asia traveling around visiting manufacturers with the president of the company I currently (for the last 12 years) work for. Before this gig, My boss was the head of Rolls Royce North America, Nakamichi Electronics and B&O Electronics. He knows full well that I spell like sh*& but he pays me a fat six figure income. Why?? Because I'm very good at my job and my spelling deficiencies mean nothing.
Your comment means nothing other then a poor attempt at making yourself sound more authoritative then Tuls. "He" has been there and done that!!
I see you are now talking allot about the M62. Let me guess. You convinced Spider to come to your shop so you could see and barrow the engineering design from DDM to make your own M62???
Come on John. Lets get down to your real problem. What could possibly be making you so mad that you keep coming into RMW threads??
Longboard
I am currently in Asia traveling around visiting manufacturers with the president of the company I currently (for the last 12 years) work for. Before this gig, My boss was the head of Rolls Royce North America, Nakamichi Electronics and B&O Electronics. He knows full well that I spell like sh*& but he pays me a fat six figure income. Why?? Because I'm very good at my job and my spelling deficiencies mean nothing.
are you guys hiring???
ill carry your luggage from place to place
So what people do to their cars is not YOUR business, why are YOU always up in someones??? And i never seen anyone not able to register a car because of performance mods.
And I also think your alittle bitter because no one wants to deal with you from this site with that attitude of yours and the fact you limit your tune to certain mods.
Thats not a tuner. Do you see GIAC or UNICHIP limiting there software to certain mods, no.
Im not a violent person and this is the internet , but if i was in your shop and you spoke me the way you just did to TULS, you'd be eating your teeth.
And speaking of the comment you made to him. Read the site guidlines if you plan on staying here.
And I also think your alittle bitter because no one wants to deal with you from this site with that attitude of yours and the fact you limit your tune to certain mods.
Thats not a tuner. Do you see GIAC or UNICHIP limiting there software to certain mods, no.Im not a violent person and this is the internet , but if i was in your shop and you spoke me the way you just did to TULS, you'd be eating your teeth.
And speaking of the comment you made to him. Read the site guidlines if you plan on staying here.
Forget about the spelling mistakes, which weren't the usual typos we all make, but actual English misuse.
Tuls was incorrect and Big Dog was correct. So Big Dog earns your wrath. No wonder Big Dog has just about given up on the mindless MINI set.
I love how some people just don't get the point. What people do with their own cars is their business. The point is that a business that provides parts and services has to adhere to these laws and advise customers accordingly. There are too many instances where people purchase cars and then can not register them for street use. This results in a huge financial disaster for these individuals especially if they're young with limited resources. Get it now Tuls? BTW,have you ever considered spell check? How about reading a book or something.
What part of what I wrote was a spelled wrong exactly anyway? Does it really matter... or is that just some way for you to actually feel like you have a reason to live. Do you feel better? BIGGER? Now yer a big dog for pickin on a dyslexic? Sorry writing isn't one of my talents... I have many others.
It's not your concern whether or not someone can register a car in another state A... and 2 why should someone car about then when they are modding their car...
Oh and Bitter Dog, just cause you read a book on how to be something doesn't mean you know how. So, you can read all the books you want. Some of us not only read books but have practical experience.
Edit: I'll tell you what, if you took what I said personally, that's too bad for you John. I have been listening to this kinda stuff for MUCH longer than you. It's old, it's been years, and while some were saying the samethings over and over people like myself, and Jan... and many others were out there doing what was said couldn't be done.
While yer point about sellign the car was true, and I never said it wasn't. It was off topic. We were talking about making cars faster. Not selling, them and what the buyer may go through.
Last edited by Tüls; Nov 16, 2007 at 07:12 AM.
this isn't going to go any where productive from here on out... i'll tell you that much. But why start taking cheap shots at people for things other then car tuning. Last i checked we were talking about making cars faster... not the evolution of linguistics are it pertains to the internet.
^^ on the subject of linguistics... many a college professor will tell you that, if it is legible and a message is conveyed with it... it counts as engrish. IE the modern language isn't a set of rules to adhere too... but rather an ever changing liquid form of communication. edumacate that.
^^ on the subject of linguistics... many a college professor will tell you that, if it is legible and a message is conveyed with it... it counts as engrish. IE the modern language isn't a set of rules to adhere too... but rather an ever changing liquid form of communication. edumacate that.
I think that in this case that Big Dog's original post was simply informative and factual.
The condescending and disparaging tone originated with the reply to it from Tuls.
Then, Big Dog responded in kind. IMO, he was right in his facts, but probably not right in letting Tuls bait him.
Just my 2 cents.
Umm, may I respectfully disagree with a bit of what you way?
I think that in this case that Big Dog's original post was simply informative and factual.
The condescending and disparaging tone originated with the reply to it from Tuls.
Then, Big Dog responded in kind. IMO, he was right in his facts, but probably not right in letting Tuls bait him.
Just my 2 cents.
I think that in this case that Big Dog's original post was simply informative and factual.
The condescending and disparaging tone originated with the reply to it from Tuls.
Then, Big Dog responded in kind. IMO, he was right in his facts, but probably not right in letting Tuls bait him.
Just my 2 cents.
So it's OK for Tuls to make a disparaging post to Big Dog, but not Big Dog back to Tuls?
Forget about the spelling mistakes, which weren't the usual typos we all make, but actual English misuse.
Tuls was incorrect and Big Dog was correct. So Big Dog earns your wrath. No wonder Big Dog has just about given up on the mindless MINI set.
Forget about the spelling mistakes, which weren't the usual typos we all make, but actual English misuse.
Tuls was incorrect and Big Dog was correct. So Big Dog earns your wrath. No wonder Big Dog has just about given up on the mindless MINI set.
Half the time I spell phonetically (which shouldn't that be fonetiklee) or use other words to be funny... but OMG you people have got to be kidding me. Get off yer grammar soap boxes... I don't walk around talking about yer in ability to understand digital animation algorithms and f-curves. Get over yer self. Yes YEEEER self.... LOL
I was not incorrect... Two states are no reason for what John posted and was irrelevant to the conversation. We were talking about efficiency not where we can register such a car.
Big "Emo" Dog needs to go to a corner and cut himself instead of taking out on people who know exactly what they are doing and that is making the MINI FREAKING FAST and don't need to be told what to do or how to do things
So where were we... oh yes... the 19% Vs the M62 vs Turbo... we left off with the intelligent part of the thread with this last post.
I dont think the M62 ever got it's full testing or rather "proper testing"... I think it would be a great mod if had the right testing. I never liked the 19% cuase the SC runs out at a low RPM and I like reving out little motors... they sing up above 4500...
yes hands down turbos are great. but like the Twincharge I find that the M62 can be more of a "bolt on" for some... which brings us to... DUN DUN DUUUUUUUH
the rotrex.... could this be the best of both worlds? Will the unpossible ever be possible? Will I ever learn to "spell" while using NAM?
Stay tuned! Same MINI place, Same MINI channel
IMHO the M62 is not worth the time or effort. For a high revving high power application go Turbo. Even with the M62 you're limited to the power, you'll NEVER see the same power or efficient use of boost as with a ball bearing turbo. Say whatever you want to try and prove otherwise but you just won't.
Would you say the 19% pulley actually reaches this point that it truly does not make any more power than a 15% even with a head?
Would you say the 19% pulley actually reaches this point that it truly does not make any more power than a 15% even with a head?
yes hands down turbos are great. but like the Twincharge I find that the M62 can be more of a "bolt on" for some... which brings us to... DUN DUN DUUUUUUUH
the rotrex.... could this be the best of both worlds? Will the unpossible ever be possible? Will I ever learn to "spell" while using NAM?
Stay tuned! Same MINI place, Same MINI channel
Last edited by Tüls; Nov 16, 2007 at 07:33 AM.
How do you find this stuff so fast?
Have fun today. I'm off to bed. It's 11:30 pm here in China.
Longboard
Have fun today. I'm off to bed. It's 11:30 pm here in China.
Longboard
Longboard
So it's OK for Tuls to make a disparaging post to Big Dog, but not Big Dog back to Tuls?
Forget about the spelling mistakes, which weren't the usual typos we all make, but actual English misuse.
Tuls was incorrect and Big Dog was correct. So Big Dog earns your wrath. No wonder Big Dog has just about given up on the mindless MINI set.
Forget about the spelling mistakes, which weren't the usual typos we all make, but actual English misuse.
Tuls was incorrect and Big Dog was correct. So Big Dog earns your wrath. No wonder Big Dog has just about given up on the mindless MINI set.
Umm, may I respectfully disagree with a bit of what you way?
I think that in this case that Big Dog's original post was simply informative and factual.
The condescending and disparaging tone originated with the reply to it from Tuls.
Then, Big Dog responded in kind. IMO, he was right in his facts, but probably not right in letting Tuls bait him.
Just my 2 cents.
I think that in this case that Big Dog's original post was simply informative and factual.
The condescending and disparaging tone originated with the reply to it from Tuls.
Then, Big Dog responded in kind. IMO, he was right in his facts, but probably not right in letting Tuls bait him.
Just my 2 cents.
i know neither of them and would of said the samething to tuls if he commented the way bigdog just did.


