But in Japan where it's called the RVR it comes with a detuned EVO engine, in that spec it's gonna murder any CM or Juke.

 

According to a recent review, the RVR vs. CM comparison is:
RVR: 102KW vs. CM: 135KW power
RVR: 172Nm vs. CM: 240Nm torque
RVR: 15km/L vs. CM: 13.6-17.8Km/L fuel consumption
RVR: 1480Kg vs. CM: 1458Kg kerb weight

 

I'm assuming that means the CM won in every catagory, although I would prefer it in American #s

 

Here ya' go:

RVR: 137 hp vs. CM: 181 hp power
RVR: 127 ft lbs vs. CM: 177 ft lbs torque
RVR: 35.7 mpg (US) vs. CM: 32-42* mpg (US) fuel consumption
RVR: 3263 lbs vs. CM: 3214 lbs kerb weight

* I assume these numbers are for the CM S-version, non-All4. One would not expect a sustained 42 mpg (US-Hwy) from this vehicle!

 

I try Mitsubisthi ASX (the name for Outlander spors in spain) and is 150cv diesel car... a bit longuer than Mini or Juke... but no "sexy" at all for me... and the engine is not sport at all... the better thing was a very good MPG results in test....
I hesitate becausa has better price with good equipement... and Xenon ligts... but i dont like how I fill into the car... i feel older..... too much conservative....