2010 MCS vs. 2007 MCS
2010 MCS vs. 2007 MCS
Hi, this is my first post on the site.
I have been driving a 2007 Mini Cooper S for the last 3 years, it was a lease. First off, the leasing company DID NOT want me to extend that lease, they quoted me a figure of over $700 a month to do so. Since I prefer to lease, I went to the dealer with a design I did online, and I got what I think is a good deal. So I get my new car just built at the factory, and I am suffering a few annoying differences.
First, the brakes. When I got my 2007, the brakes were so tight I might have went through the windshield if I did not have the seat belt on.
Well close, anyway. After a few days, it loosened up, and became perfection. The 2010 model brakes are in a word, weak. It was quite an adjustment, I am used to the thing just stopping right away, if you pushed the brake past a certain level. This one doesn't seem to have such a point. It stops, but you have to give it a bit more distance. Annoying.
The 2007 model handling was amazing, cornering was effortless, without any centrifugal "slosh". The 2010, just a bit of slosh, enough to be annoying with what I am used to.
The 2007 was a hard ride, which I have come to love. I like to feel the road now. The 2010 has less hard ride, I feel quite disconnected from the road. Could it be the DSC?
The 2007 seemed (to me) to have almost no turbo lag. Which helped getting on I-80 BTW. The 2010 has some, it takes a noticeable amount of additional time to get up to speed. If I really push it in lower gears, I can get moving nicely, but I don't prefer to do that.
I am no gear-head, I hope I have described this so you get what I mean. Do I need some kind of a tune-up (factory setup being poor), or are these just genuine differences?
I have been driving a 2007 Mini Cooper S for the last 3 years, it was a lease. First off, the leasing company DID NOT want me to extend that lease, they quoted me a figure of over $700 a month to do so. Since I prefer to lease, I went to the dealer with a design I did online, and I got what I think is a good deal. So I get my new car just built at the factory, and I am suffering a few annoying differences.
First, the brakes. When I got my 2007, the brakes were so tight I might have went through the windshield if I did not have the seat belt on.
Well close, anyway. After a few days, it loosened up, and became perfection. The 2010 model brakes are in a word, weak. It was quite an adjustment, I am used to the thing just stopping right away, if you pushed the brake past a certain level. This one doesn't seem to have such a point. It stops, but you have to give it a bit more distance. Annoying.The 2007 model handling was amazing, cornering was effortless, without any centrifugal "slosh". The 2010, just a bit of slosh, enough to be annoying with what I am used to.
The 2007 was a hard ride, which I have come to love. I like to feel the road now. The 2010 has less hard ride, I feel quite disconnected from the road. Could it be the DSC?
The 2007 seemed (to me) to have almost no turbo lag. Which helped getting on I-80 BTW. The 2010 has some, it takes a noticeable amount of additional time to get up to speed. If I really push it in lower gears, I can get moving nicely, but I don't prefer to do that.
I am no gear-head, I hope I have described this so you get what I mean. Do I need some kind of a tune-up (factory setup being poor), or are these just genuine differences?
I have a 2009 MC and yes the brakes were pretty touchy for the first 500 miles but have now settled in nicely and are plenty strong. I have a hard ride made harder by the Hotchkis rear competition sway bar and track tires, don't have turbo so nothing to compare with, sorry.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kimolaoha
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
70
Jul 5, 2023 01:04 PM
Kimolaoha
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
5
Dec 5, 2020 09:32 PM



