Stock Problems/Issues Discussions related to warranty related issues and repairs, or other problems with the OEM parts and software for MINI Cooper (R50), Cabrio (R52), and Cooper S (R53) MINIs.

The Yo-Yo Chronicles

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 12:54 PM
  #651  
tme's Avatar
tme
1st Gear
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
to get the SW upgrade or not get the SW upgrade???

I'm coming up on my 10K mile service and I can't decide whether to get the upgrade to V38 or not. I had a terrible yoyo until I applied the cable tie fix, now I have NO yoyo, and better throttle response, and minor (if any) gas mileage reduction (of course I'll snip the ties before it gets to the dealer).

I've read in a couple of places that V38 "fixed 99% of the yoyo" or "almost fixed the yoyo".... The cable tie fixes it 100%.

So I'm wondering, since I'm pretty happy with the cable tie fix. Why should I get the new SW? Is there a compelling reason to get V38, or not to get it?

As a corollary what if I get V38 and then re-apply the cable tie fix anyway?

Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.

And to MINIUSA please don't input your "lawyer post" about "modifications to the vehicle void the warranty"....
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 12:57 PM
  #652  
Blue Brummie's Avatar
Blue Brummie
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
I think I've missed something. What "cable tie fix" are you referring to ??

BB
 
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 03:47 PM
  #653  
Ryephile's Avatar
Ryephile
Thread Starter
|
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,009
Likes: 32
From: Metro-Detroit
--->Blue Brummie - you missed something alright - go look on Page 6 of this thread


--->tme, and anyone considering V38 due to crappy drivability: DO IT. If your car sucks, V38 will help it suck less.

*Same fuel economy,
*better cruise control,
*better traction control,
*better drivability,
*reduced Yo-Yo,
*better overall.
 
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2004 | 10:23 PM
  #654  
KatanaPilot's Avatar
KatanaPilot
4th Gear
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Woo hoo, today for the first time in weeks, my car started on the 1st try.

What did I do? I held the key in the start position for about 5 seconds until the engine finally reluctantly started...... This is NOT good....

BTW has anyone on this board in the Northeast run anything lower than 93 Octane gas? The reason I am asking is that some BMWs are also experiencing this problem, and some dealers are suggesting 89 Octane as the temporary fix.
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 01:26 PM
  #655  
LeeL's Avatar
LeeL
5th Gear
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Morrisville, NC
Originally Posted by KatanaPilot
Woo hoo, today for the first time in weeks, my car started on the 1st try.

What did I do? I held the key in the start position for about 5 seconds until the engine finally reluctantly started...... This is NOT good....

BTW has anyone on this board in the Northeast run anything lower than 93 Octane gas? The reason I am asking is that some BMWs are also experiencing this problem, and some dealers are suggesting 89 Octane as the temporary fix.
I use 93 but how could changing to 89 help?
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 02:01 PM
  #656  
silver-mini-s's Avatar
silver-mini-s
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Don't use anything under 91. I heard you can cause major engine problems using lower grade gas in the MINI.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 07:13 AM
  #657  
C4's Avatar
C4
Banned
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,756
Likes: 0
Before switching to lower octane fuels, I highly recommend to at least try out a tankful of Citgo 93 Octane gasoline. It has made a TREMENDOUS difference in my '04 MCS and I don't doubt it will also benefit your cars as well.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 01:46 PM
  #658  
Cooperb!'s Avatar
Cooperb!
3rd Gear
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Well, after a year of Yo-Yo, and having the stumble fixed just the other week, I finally took a morning to read through this loooooooong thread.

I rushed out and performed Ryephile's cable-tie mod on my MCS, and took it for a spin.



Wooooooo Hoooooooo! is an understatement

Now I remember what my 02 MCS felt like - smooth and yo-yo free.

This is the first time my 03 has driven this way, and I'm finally a happy owner.

Truly hope that MINI provide an approved fix for the issue soon, but until then, I guess I'll burn that extra gas in return for no yo-yo.

Thanks Ryephile and everyone, this is one cool thread, and it's amazing what people can do for themselves when they work together!

Chris.

PS With the K&N Typhoon fitted, I could do the cable-tie mod without removing anything from the induction system. It took just two minutes, and couldn't be easier to undo/redo in the future.
 

Last edited by Cooperb!; Jul 21, 2004 at 01:50 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2004 | 07:34 AM
  #659  
keen's Avatar
keen
3rd Gear
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 7
From: geneva, fl
Originally Posted by Cooperb!
PS With the K&N Typhoon fitted, I could do the cable-tie mod without removing anything from the induction system. It took just two minutes, and couldn't be easier to undo/redo in the future.

I purchased a used '03 with 17k miles on it a week and a half ago....it was a victim of the yoyo as well. Drove it till yesterday that way. Last night I removed the servo linkage and tied the bypass valve closed.

Driving to work this morning, no yoyo! It does seem to over-shoot the amount of throttle I give it, then back off, but that's not as bad as the yoyo.

BTW, I also did mine without removing any of the intake (stock). Tight squeeze, but did it in about 5 minutes with my girlfriend holding the flashlight. (didn't feel like pulling the truck, tractor, or bus out of the shop)

...david
 
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2004 | 07:54 AM
  #660  
Cooperb!'s Avatar
Cooperb!
3rd Gear
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Hey, was that you I met at Brecht MINI?

Indi Blue MCS with the Scottish Flag on the roof?

Chris.
 
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2004 | 08:57 PM
  #661  
Ryephile's Avatar
Ryephile
Thread Starter
|
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,009
Likes: 32
From: Metro-Detroit
It's been a while since there've been any updates here - I suppose that means this thread may be winding down.

I've been hearing/reading that some dealership service managers have been told by their regional managers that CD38 contains NO upgrades for the MINI Nothing could be further from the truth! I spent a good amount of time with the SM of Classic MINI discussing this today. Somehow their lines got crossed - hopefully I untangled them a bit.

I now have about 5,500 miles on V38; 3,700 of those being with the UNIchip. I still get some of that part throttle hesitation, but certainly no Yo-Yo. Keep in mind I am stillrunning my Ryephix #2 (the stiffer bypass valve return spring). The 'phix #2 is still a key player in the excellent drivability of my MINI. Everytime I drive another MCS, I can always feel that crappy stock bypass valve oscillating, grrr.

I wonder how the '05's will fare.
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 05:33 AM
  #662  
rajron's Avatar
rajron
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: PHX area
Could you summarize the fixes you have done?
The only thing I have done is to have the CD38 upgrade. For me it has helped tremendously but still there is a drivability problem which I find unacceptable for a modern car. Because the goods out weigh the bad I am keeping the car but I want to make the car more drivable.
Like I said I have the CD38 mod for the last 2.5K miles or so.
What other simple modifications do you think will further enhance the Min’s drivability?
I am considering an ECU upgrade but leaning towards keeping the car stock otherwise, the pix#2 sounds interesting and was wondering would that help my stock car?
ron
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 09:29 AM
  #663  
Ryephile's Avatar
Ryephile
Thread Starter
|
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,009
Likes: 32
From: Metro-Detroit
a quality aftermarket ECU like the UNIchip will improve the car on just about every point: drivability, power and torque, and fuel economy (assuming a stable right foot). That said, it's pricey - though can be easily removed for the rare dealership appointment.

The Ryephix #2 is A) tough to build, and B) hurts fuel economy by about 9%. If you're serious about wanting one, I can build you one, or guide you through it. You may be better off doing the zip-tie, as it's much cheaper and easier to impliment, though hurts fuel economy even more. See Page 6 of this thread for the How-To! You can always clip it off - no harm no foul.
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2004 | 02:17 PM
  #664  
Roadglide's Avatar
Roadglide
1st Gear
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Area
I still get some of that part throttle hesitation, but certainly no Yo-Yo.

Ryephile, I had CD38 installed around 3 wks. ago and am also getting some "part throttle" hesitation. I don't think they'll ever get rid of it...
I just installed a Rogue/Madness CAI system and it seemed to reduce the amount of hesitation at mid-throttle. This I can live with.:smile:

Bill
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2004 | 03:53 AM
  #665  
rajron's Avatar
rajron
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: PHX area
Ryephile;

I didn’t realize your mods would reduce gas mileage, I’m going to hold off on them. One of the reasons I got the Mini was because it offered decent performance with high gas mileage.
You mentioned the UNIchip, what did it cost for that device?
The ECU I was considering was the PowerChip which costs about $700.00, a little steep in my book, and now Dinan is coming out with one for half the price so I’m leaning towards there ECU,

ron
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2004 | 05:18 AM
  #666  
Blue Brummie's Avatar
Blue Brummie
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
The Unichip ECU is $735 through Webb Motorsports. Yeah, it's a little steep, but you do get much smoother response, and it will help with the Yo-Yo.

The additional benefit is a bit more Hp/Torque. I've had mine for about 2 weeks, and I love the way my MINI drives now. The fact that the torque comes on earlier in the powerband, actually should improve MPG slightly as you don't have to push the pedal down as hard to get the same accelaration. I have noted a slight reduction in MPG, but this is only because I've been hammering the throttle and running up to 6-7K RPM's more often than I usually would. I have a long-ish drive this weekend, and I'll stick to my normal driving habits to see how the car does.

If you can swing the $$, this is an upgrade I'd recommend.

BB
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2004 | 07:17 AM
  #667  
Cooperb!'s Avatar
Cooperb!
3rd Gear
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by rajron
Ryephile;

I didn’t realize your mods would reduce gas mileage, I’m going to hold off on them. One of the reasons I got the Mini was because it offered decent performance with high gas mileage.
ron
Well, I took at tie-wrap modiefied MCS from N San Diego, on the 5 up through LA, to Valencia and then back via the 15 & Murietta yesterday.

Nice long run (260+ miles), lots of 90+ mph

On the way up, I was averaging 32 mpg at an average 72 MPH over 130 miles - No AC as it was still cool in the morning (74)

(If you ever drive through LA - you'll know how fast I was going on the clear sections to average 74 for the whole trip!)

On the way back in the afternoon I had to use AC, as the outside temp was up to 94.

And I hit the LA traffic on the 91 going East to the 15, so did the nose to tail crawl for 45 mins

Still managed 29 MPG averaged over the whole day, average speed dropped to just 48 MPH :smile:

Now, considering I had the pedal to the metal when ever traffic allowed, and the car was just flying with the boosted side-effect of the mod, I am more than happy with both MPG and performance. :smile:

I have permangrin again, and that smug feeling that you only get when you've left the SUV/Truck crowd behind in traffic, as you nimbly zip through the slow coaches

Chris.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2004 | 08:45 AM
  #668  
Bradley99's Avatar
Bradley99
3rd Gear
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: 3rd Stone from the Sun
Originally Posted by Ryephile
Everytime I drive another MCS, I can always feel that crappy stock bypass valve oscillating, grrr.
You wouldn't feel it in mine because its got a 0.0295" restriction orifice installed in the BPV vacuum line. I know you think that this is a bad idea, that it somehow causes an unacceptable delay in throttle response, but I claim it is not noticable.

The step response, the response to an instantaneous change of controlling vacuum, of the valve with this mod is about 200 msec but this number is not an indication of the effective delay - it is a metric with which to compare modification effects. The actual throttle movement and resulting change in upstream manifold pressure (which controls the BPV position) is not instantaneous and any induced delay is going to be smaller than the step response number.

Additionally, it hasn't affected my mileage. One thing I don't know is whether it affects the buck that occurs when the throttle is quickly closed from a condition of boost to one of partial vacuum, say 10". This might occur when accelerating in 2nd to 4k, then quickly reducing throttle input slightly. I suspect that the delay in valve response coupled with throttle overshoot would be most noticeable under this condion. I can induce this but I don't know whether I had it before the mod - it was only after reading about the buck in the v38 thread that I bothered to notice. (Isn't that the way it is?)

Someone else with a bad yoyo please try this. One more person here is going to try it soon. He made a restriction by drilling a hole axially down a 1/4" length of 3/16" dia aluminum rod. He intends to press the restriction into the stock rubber hose and reinstall. I'll post his results after he installs.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2004 | 01:51 PM
  #669  
cpeters's Avatar
cpeters
1st Gear
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Bradley99, I wish you had been here in January, cause I suggested the restriction thing and was shot down as a bad idea back then. See post #94 and 96. I never did try it and still suffer from YoYo, so I am gald it seems to have worked for you.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 06:31 PM
  #670  
Ryephile's Avatar
Ryephile
Thread Starter
|
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,009
Likes: 32
From: Metro-Detroit
Something that I've noticed

It seems that everyone that upgrades to V38 has to reset their adaptive logic before the car will operate smoothly and normally. Once you reset the ECU via the OBDII interface in the odometer (see how-to on MINI2, test 19 sub-test 21), the car will run fine (assuming a proper break-in cycle).

I'll have to report this quirk to MINIUSA.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2004 | 11:06 PM
  #671  
SCMCS's Avatar
SCMCS
4th Gear
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Millbrae, California- A Place In The Sun
Originally Posted by Ryephile
It seems that everyone that upgrades to V38 has to reset their adaptive logic before the car will operate smoothly and normally. Once you reset the ECU via the OBDII interface in the odometer (see how-to on MINI2, test 19 sub-test 21), the car will run fine (assuming a proper break-in cycle).

I'll have to report this quirk to MINIUSA.
Rye,

Is this the procedure you are referring to?

http://www.mini2.com/forum/faq.php?s...l&titlesonly=0

Thanks

Steve
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2004 | 08:06 AM
  #672  
Ryephile's Avatar
Ryephile
Thread Starter
|
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,009
Likes: 32
From: Metro-Detroit
Yes, exactly. Test 21 (software reset) is the key to post-dealership non-suck V38.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2004 | 09:53 AM
  #673  
apexer's Avatar
apexer
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: Uniontown, PA
Ryan: Guess I'm stupid, are you saying that, after dealer installs V38, I should disconnect my battery for a few minutes then reconnect, in order to get V38 to help solve Yo Yo .

Originally Posted by Ryephile
It seems that everyone that upgrades to V38 has to reset their adaptive logic before the car will operate smoothly and normally. Once you reset the ECU via the OBDII interface in the odometer (see how-to on MINI2, test 19 sub-test 21), the car will run fine (assuming a proper break-in cycle).

I'll have to report this quirk to MINIUSA.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2004 | 09:14 PM
  #674  
Ryephile's Avatar
Ryephile
Thread Starter
|
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,009
Likes: 32
From: Metro-Detroit
No, resetting the adaptive logic won't necessarily help with the Yo-Yo, but it will reduce the inherent suck the dealership seems to inject along with V38.
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2004 | 11:22 AM
  #675  
Newkevin's Avatar
Newkevin
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
A question and comment

Ok, so I finally broke down and took my 06/03 build MCS in for some service
(squeaky D/S window, glove box that falls open, all got fixed btw) and I also asked that the software be updated to deal w/ the 1st gear stumble. OH MY what a diffference! I hardly recognized my own car!
The stumble, so it seems, at least for now, is vanquished!
The paperwork says nothing about v38 specifically, it only says:
"Reprogram D M E and code motronic units" Am I to assume that v38 was part of this?

Also, the loss of the stumble seems to be at the expense of some of the low end torque. Has anybody else had this experience?
I am quite happy with the lack of stumble, but I would like the torque back.
Any suggestions? And no, I have not done the ECU reset.
btw, the car is completely stock, at least for now
Oh, one last thing, all of this work was done at Century West BMW, and they were terrific!
I wouldn't buy a MINI from Universal MINI if I were being threatened with amputation, but the service from C-W BMW gets a thumbs up.
Off to Topanga Canyon for a good road test!
-K-
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:27 PM.