Puzzling interpretation of site rules
Puzzling interpretation of site rules
I noticed earlier that a thread was locked with the justification of, "Well as discussion of banned users is not permitted I'm going to go ahead and close this one."
I looked over the rules and saw none that could be applied for this. Or have banned NAM users become now like "Fight Club" insofar and you can't even talk about them without getting a thread locked?
link to thread
link to site guidelines
I looked over the rules and saw none that could be applied for this. Or have banned NAM users become now like "Fight Club" insofar and you can't even talk about them without getting a thread locked?

link to thread
link to site guidelines
Last edited by ashboomstick; May 12, 2010 at 04:10 PM. Reason: grammatical error
From the site guidelines you linked to (#10)...
Does that clear things up?
POLITICS & BANNING
Discussions related to politics and banning are not permitted. Comments or questions regarding banning should be sent in through the Contact Us link found in the Main Menu block.
Discussions related to politics and banning are not permitted. Comments or questions regarding banning should be sent in through the Contact Us link found in the Main Menu block.
My .02. It was a discussion about ones behaviour and general road etiquette. It was taken down because it involved a banned member.
The discussion was about an event, not the person or the politics behind his banning. Reasons for his ban weren't even brought up.
Were misinterpreting written rules here to facilitate thread closings.
Again, just my ignorant .02
The discussion was about an event, not the person or the politics behind his banning. Reasons for his ban weren't even brought up.
Were misinterpreting written rules here to facilitate thread closings.
Again, just my ignorant .02
It was discussion of a banned user, illegal driving and included personal attacks. All three of which are not allowed.
https://www.northamericanmotoring.com/guidelines
https://www.northamericanmotoring.com/guidelines
It was discussion of a banned user, illegal driving and included personal attacks. All three of which are not allowed.
https://www.northamericanmotoring.com/guidelines
https://www.northamericanmotoring.com/guidelines
If the thread was deleted for these three reasons, why were they not stated? The illegal driving and personal attacks are specifically mentioned in the site guidelines vice the vague "people we shall not speak of" guideline.
In addition, the illegal driving mentioned in the OP wasn't of the "hey, I got my car up to 130 mph on the highway, how fast have you gone?" kind, it was a "hey listen to what I saw this d-bag do" kind. And looking through the "OT: Autos" section of the site you can find hundreds of posts of this type going back since the creation of this site that have not been banned/locked/ or had the posters peepee smacked. There's simply no consistency.
And don't think I've got any kind of love for Autoxcooper either, he's well known across the MINI community as being an unsavory person. I probably would have given him the trailer hitch too.
Last edited by ashboomstick; May 13, 2010 at 02:47 PM.
Trending Topics
Not really, no. What is "discussion of banning?" Is it referring to person that has been banned for whatever reason (which apparently it is...), does it include someone saying "man, this guy should be banned, or even a post that contains the letters "b", "a", and "n" in sequence preceded and followed by spaces? The wording of the rule is very nebulous and makes knowing exactly what it's trying to say difficult to discern.
an act or instance of discussing; consideration or examination by argument, comment, etc., esp. to explore solutions; informal debate.
And if you read the site guidelines that you linked to then you should have noticed under the Discipline section the following wording....
Interpretation and enforcement of these guidelines is done by the moderators and staff of North American Motoring and all judgments are final. It is not possible to list every possible contingency and variation on each rule, hence the need for human interpretation by the above parties for each specific case.
If the thread was deleted for these three reasons, why were they not stated? The illegal driving and personal attacks are specifically mentioned in the site guidelines vice the vague "people we shall not speak of" guideline.
In addition, the illegal driving mentioned in the OP wasn't of the "hey, I got my car up to 130 mph on the highway, how fast have you gone?" kind, it was a "hey listen to what I saw this d-bag do" kind. And looking through the "OT: Autos" section of the site you can find hundreds of posts going back years of this type that have not been banned/locked/ or had the posters peepee smacked. There's no consistency.
And don't think I've got any kind of love for Autoxcooper either, he's well known across the MINI community as being an unsavory person. I probably would have given him the trailer hitch too.
In addition, the illegal driving mentioned in the OP wasn't of the "hey, I got my car up to 130 mph on the highway, how fast have you gone?" kind, it was a "hey listen to what I saw this d-bag do" kind. And looking through the "OT: Autos" section of the site you can find hundreds of posts going back years of this type that have not been banned/locked/ or had the posters peepee smacked. There's no consistency.
And don't think I've got any kind of love for Autoxcooper either, he's well known across the MINI community as being an unsavory person. I probably would have given him the trailer hitch too.

Second, I did not feel the need, unlike others here, to keep beating a dead horse, and if you go back over the years you'll find many unproductive threads, that were closed for just that and not including violations of multiple guidelines.
First the thread was not deleted, it was locked.
Second, I did not feel the need, unlike others here, to keep beating a dead horse, and if you go back over the years you'll find many unproductive threads, that were closed for just that and not including violations of multiple guidelines.
If the mod-hammer is being brandished as aggressively and frequently as it has been in the past couple of years, at least let it be consistently too. You owe it to the members of this board and especially to the paying members of this board.
There are 5 active moderators for a membership of over 80k. Do the math - it's impossible for moderation to cover all ground. The intention is for NAM to be largely self-moderated by the membership, which means helping new members understand the lay of the land, the rules of the site, and reporting things that are out-of-bounds.
If you see something that is out-of-bounds that isn't being addressed, then it is far more helpful for you to report it using the
button located at the top right of the post, than to bicker about it here. It is simply impossible for the moderation team to lay eyes on every single post made every single day.
If you see something that is out-of-bounds that isn't being addressed, then it is far more helpful for you to report it using the
button located at the top right of the post, than to bicker about it here. It is simply impossible for the moderation team to lay eyes on every single post made every single day.
If these are active threads, then you should use the
button to report them. As not doing so is a disservice to the entire the NAM membership.
One such post today, I got a response from a user that they hadn't even read the guidelines yet when they got a warning. And the thread that is lock that you linked to, I did PM the OP and explain why it was locked.
Education and reminders are hardly what I'd call "the mod-hammer is being brandished as aggressively and frequently" And it's not that the moderators are locking threads on a whim, the thread that you're so displeased about getting locked was reported twice within 5 minutes and a third time as it was being locked; so it being found was by no means an accident nor coincidence, and as the guideline above stated the situation was evaluated and the thread locked, and the primary reason given; no need to berate people as to why it was closed, and after sending a PM to the OP I did not even feel it was worth giving an infraction. How aggressive of me.
button to report them. As not doing so is a disservice to the entire the NAM membership.One such post today, I got a response from a user that they hadn't even read the guidelines yet when they got a warning. And the thread that is lock that you linked to, I did PM the OP and explain why it was locked.
Education and reminders are hardly what I'd call "the mod-hammer is being brandished as aggressively and frequently" And it's not that the moderators are locking threads on a whim, the thread that you're so displeased about getting locked was reported twice within 5 minutes and a third time as it was being locked; so it being found was by no means an accident nor coincidence, and as the guideline above stated the situation was evaluated and the thread locked, and the primary reason given; no need to berate people as to why it was closed, and after sending a PM to the OP I did not even feel it was worth giving an infraction. How aggressive of me.
The OP and I finished our discussion via PM, and got our points across to each other in an amicable and respectful manner.
I also felt the thread should not have been closed at that point, FWIW....
I also felt the thread should not have been closed at that point, FWIW....
I'm sorry, but I do not think there should be a place on any forum where people can just "duke it out" and say whatever they want. It's easy to be a loudmouth jerk behind the anonimity of a keyboard, and people often say things they would not say in person. I believe message boards should require people to be respectful and behave like adults and adhere to a standard of decorum at all times.
As to this thread topic, I understand that the admins/mods have a difficult job when folks don't act like adults, but they also can be quick on the trigger sometimes - but it's their judgement call and while I might not agree, I do respect their position, that's why the OP and I continued our discussion privately.
As to this thread topic, I understand that the admins/mods have a difficult job when folks don't act like adults, but they also can be quick on the trigger sometimes - but it's their judgement call and while I might not agree, I do respect their position, that's why the OP and I continued our discussion privately.
http://www.mininuts.com/forum/index.php?a=forum&f=2
On NAM, however, all the guidelines will continue to apply on all the forums.
Might I suggest you check out this SoCal based MINI club.
http://www.mininuts.com/forum/index.php?a=forum&f=2
On NAM, however, all the guidelines will continue to apply on all the forums.
http://www.mininuts.com/forum/index.php?a=forum&f=2
On NAM, however, all the guidelines will continue to apply on all the forums.
Oh my goodness Pimp, dahlink where have you been my love we miss you. Of course you wouldn't know that now would you?
Lest I remind you of your less than polite behavior during your prior visits to the site we shan't speak of. Homosexual innuendo is so uncouth these days.
Missed you at AMVIV, my love, pray tell how, is your rolling MINI BOOMBOX ?
You haven't posted any updates?
i hear they kick puppies.
, who would of ever figured that would happen
.Mark
Might I suggest you check out this SoCal based MINI club.
http://www.mininuts.com/forum/index.php?a=forum&f=2
On NAM, however, all the guidelines will continue to apply on all the forums.
http://www.mininuts.com/forum/index.php?a=forum&f=2
On NAM, however, all the guidelines will continue to apply on all the forums.



Mark
NO OTHER SITES
Advertising of products or solicitation of traffic for other websites is forbidden without prior express written permission from North American Motoring staff.
Advertising of products or solicitation of traffic for other websites is forbidden without prior express written permission from North American Motoring staff.
However members are encouraged to seek out their local clubs, many of which are listed on the main forums page. And many other forums, including MINI2, MotoringUnderground, minicooperforum, miniforum are frequently linked to when doing so is of benefit to the community.


