Site Feedback Open forum for discussion of this site. Post your kudos or criticism so that we can continually improve service to the new MINI community.

Puzzling interpretation of site rules

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2010 | 03:35 PM
  #1  
ashboomstick's Avatar
ashboomstick
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Puzzling interpretation of site rules

I noticed earlier that a thread was locked with the justification of, "Well as discussion of banned users is not permitted I'm going to go ahead and close this one."

I looked over the rules and saw none that could be applied for this. Or have banned NAM users become now like "Fight Club" insofar and you can't even talk about them without getting a thread locked?

link to thread

link to site guidelines
 

Last edited by ashboomstick; May 12, 2010 at 04:10 PM. Reason: grammatical error
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 01:06 AM
  #2  
Motor On's Avatar
Motor On
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,848
Likes: 15
From the site guidelines you linked to (#10)...
POLITICS & BANNING
Discussions related to politics and banning are not permitted. Comments or questions regarding banning should be sent in through the Contact Us link found in the Main Menu block.
Does that clear things up?
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 05:29 AM
  #3  
Pir8 97's Avatar
Pir8 97
4th Gear
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: G'ville NC
But it was a discussion about the person, not about him being banned. Yes, they mentioned that he was banned but didn't discuss why he was banned. All it says was
he’s been banned for something
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 07:11 AM
  #4  
ImNotViley's Avatar
ImNotViley
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Brawltimore
My .02. It was a discussion about ones behaviour and general road etiquette. It was taken down because it involved a banned member.
The discussion was about an event, not the person or the politics behind his banning. Reasons for his ban weren't even brought up.
Were misinterpreting written rules here to facilitate thread closings.
Again, just my ignorant .02
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 09:28 AM
  #5  
glnr13's Avatar
glnr13
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
"off with his head!"
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 10:01 AM
  #6  
Motor On's Avatar
Motor On
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,848
Likes: 15
It was discussion of a banned user, illegal driving and included personal attacks. All three of which are not allowed.

https://www.northamericanmotoring.com/guidelines
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 02:39 PM
  #7  
ashboomstick's Avatar
ashboomstick
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Originally Posted by Motor On
From the site guidelines you linked to (#10)...


Does that clear things up?
Not really, no. What is "discussion of banning?" Is it referring to person that has been banned for whatever reason (which apparently it is...), does it include someone saying "man, this guy should be banned, or even a post that contains the letters "b", "a", and "n" in sequence preceded and followed by spaces? The wording of the rule is very nebulous and makes knowing exactly what it's trying to say difficult to discern.



Originally Posted by Motor On
It was discussion of a banned user, illegal driving and included personal attacks. All three of which are not allowed.

https://www.northamericanmotoring.com/guidelines

If the thread was deleted for these three reasons, why were they not stated? The illegal driving and personal attacks are specifically mentioned in the site guidelines vice the vague "people we shall not speak of" guideline.

In addition, the illegal driving mentioned in the OP wasn't of the "hey, I got my car up to 130 mph on the highway, how fast have you gone?" kind, it was a "hey listen to what I saw this d-bag do" kind. And looking through the "OT: Autos" section of the site you can find hundreds of posts of this type going back since the creation of this site that have not been banned/locked/ or had the posters peepee smacked. There's simply no consistency.

And don't think I've got any kind of love for Autoxcooper either, he's well known across the MINI community as being an unsavory person. I probably would have given him the trailer hitch too.
 

Last edited by ashboomstick; May 13, 2010 at 02:47 PM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 02:57 PM
  #8  
Motor On's Avatar
Motor On
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,848
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by ashboomstick
Not really, no. What is "discussion of banning?" Is it referring to person that has been banned for whatever reason (which apparently it is...), does it include someone saying "man, this guy should be banned, or even a post that contains the letters "b", "a", and "n" in sequence preceded and followed by spaces? The wording of the rule is very nebulous and makes knowing exactly what it's trying to say difficult to discern.
an act or instance of discussing; consideration or examination by argument, comment, etc., esp. to explore solutions; informal debate.
The word by itself is generally not considered a discussion.

And if you read the site guidelines that you linked to then you should have noticed under the Discipline section the following wording....
Interpretation and enforcement of these guidelines is done by the moderators and staff of North American Motoring and all judgments are final. It is not possible to list every possible contingency and variation on each rule, hence the need for human interpretation by the above parties for each specific case.
Which means that the moderators will evaluate the individual situation and interpret the guidelines accordingly.

Originally Posted by ashboomstick
If the thread was deleted for these three reasons, why were they not stated? The illegal driving and personal attacks are specifically mentioned in the site guidelines vice the vague "people we shall not speak of" guideline.

In addition, the illegal driving mentioned in the OP wasn't of the "hey, I got my car up to 130 mph on the highway, how fast have you gone?" kind, it was a "hey listen to what I saw this d-bag do" kind. And looking through the "OT: Autos" section of the site you can find hundreds of posts going back years of this type that have not been banned/locked/ or had the posters peepee smacked. There's no consistency.

And don't think I've got any kind of love for Autoxcooper either, he's well known across the MINI community as being an unsavory person. I probably would have given him the trailer hitch too.
First the thread was not deleted, it was locked.

Second, I did not feel the need, unlike others here, to keep beating a dead horse, and if you go back over the years you'll find many unproductive threads, that were closed for just that and not including violations of multiple guidelines.
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 03:16 PM
  #9  
ashboomstick's Avatar
ashboomstick
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Originally Posted by Motor On
And if you read the site guidelines that you linked to then you should have noticed under the Discipline section the following wording....

Which means that the moderators will evaluate the individual situation and interpret the guidelines accordingly.
Yeah I did; it seem vaguely worded to the point where, to the outside observer, it looks like the mods can lock threads/delete posts on a whim, which I'd like to think isn't happening.
Originally Posted by Motor On

First the thread was not deleted, it was locked.

Second, I did not feel the need, unlike others here, to keep beating a dead horse, and if you go back over the years you'll find many unproductive threads, that were closed for just that and not including violations of multiple guidelines.
Whoops sorry, I accidentally said deleted; I mentioned in the OP it was locked. I'm not talking about "unproductive" threads that got locked for no legitimate reason, I'm talking about threads that have content that violate the site guideline that you specifically mentioned as a reason for locking the thread that are still active.

If the mod-hammer is being brandished as aggressively and frequently as it has been in the past couple of years, at least let it be consistently too. You owe it to the members of this board and especially to the paying members of this board.
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 03:21 PM
  #10  
MLPearson79's Avatar
MLPearson79
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,746
Likes: 10
From: Terre Haute, IN
There are 5 active moderators for a membership of over 80k. Do the math - it's impossible for moderation to cover all ground. The intention is for NAM to be largely self-moderated by the membership, which means helping new members understand the lay of the land, the rules of the site, and reporting things that are out-of-bounds.

If you see something that is out-of-bounds that isn't being addressed, then it is far more helpful for you to report it using the button located at the top right of the post, than to bicker about it here. It is simply impossible for the moderation team to lay eyes on every single post made every single day.
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 03:33 PM
  #11  
Motor On's Avatar
Motor On
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,848
Likes: 15
If these are active threads, then you should use the button to report them. As not doing so is a disservice to the entire the NAM membership.

One such post today, I got a response from a user that they hadn't even read the guidelines yet when they got a warning. And the thread that is lock that you linked to, I did PM the OP and explain why it was locked.

Education and reminders are hardly what I'd call "the mod-hammer is being brandished as aggressively and frequently" And it's not that the moderators are locking threads on a whim, the thread that you're so displeased about getting locked was reported twice within 5 minutes and a third time as it was being locked; so it being found was by no means an accident nor coincidence, and as the guideline above stated the situation was evaluated and the thread locked, and the primary reason given; no need to berate people as to why it was closed, and after sending a PM to the OP I did not even feel it was worth giving an infraction. How aggressive of me.
 
Reply
Old May 13, 2010 | 06:56 PM
  #12  
MINIdave's Avatar
MINIdave
6th Gear
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,789
Likes: 10
From: Kansas City
The OP and I finished our discussion via PM, and got our points across to each other in an amicable and respectful manner.

I also felt the thread should not have been closed at that point, FWIW....
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 08:36 AM
  #13  
Porthos's Avatar
Porthos
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,455
Likes: 14
From: None yours!
This is exactly why there should there should be a **** talking section so people can just dook it out and call people out for innane reasons.
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 09:09 AM
  #14  
MINIdave's Avatar
MINIdave
6th Gear
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,789
Likes: 10
From: Kansas City
I'm sorry, but I do not think there should be a place on any forum where people can just "duke it out" and say whatever they want. It's easy to be a loudmouth jerk behind the anonimity of a keyboard, and people often say things they would not say in person. I believe message boards should require people to be respectful and behave like adults and adhere to a standard of decorum at all times.

As to this thread topic, I understand that the admins/mods have a difficult job when folks don't act like adults, but they also can be quick on the trigger sometimes - but it's their judgement call and while I might not agree, I do respect their position, that's why the OP and I continued our discussion privately.
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 09:20 AM
  #15  
Motor On's Avatar
Motor On
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,848
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by Porthos
This is exactly why there should there should be a **** talking section so people can just dook it out and call people out for innane reasons.
Might I suggest you check out this SoCal based MINI club.
http://www.mininuts.com/forum/index.php?a=forum&f=2

On NAM, however, all the guidelines will continue to apply on all the forums.
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 11:17 AM
  #16  
r52pimp's Avatar
r52pimp
Banned
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Motor On
Might I suggest you check out this SoCal based MINI club.
http://www.mininuts.com/forum/index.php?a=forum&f=2

On NAM, however, all the guidelines will continue to apply on all the forums.
I followed your link. What a vile and childish group. They would lend credence to having internet censorship.
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 11:42 AM
  #17  
Motor On's Avatar
Motor On
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,848
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by r52pimp
I followed your link. What a vile and childish group. They would lend credence to having internet censorship.
I don't know it's been kind of quiet lately, almost like they're all out sewing or something.
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 12:11 PM
  #18  
r52pimp's Avatar
r52pimp
Banned
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Probably out driving over the speed limit. On public streets. Cretans.
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 02:13 PM
  #19  
firenewt's Avatar
firenewt
4th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Greenwood, IN
In school zones.............
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 03:11 PM
  #20  
Kelly Girl's Avatar
Kelly Girl
Banned
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
From: in a house
Originally Posted by r52pimp
I followed your link. What a vile and childish group. They would lend credence to having internet censorship.

Oh my goodness Pimp, dahlink where have you been my love we miss you. Of course you wouldn't know that now would you?

Lest I remind you of your less than polite behavior during your prior visits to the site we shan't speak of. Homosexual innuendo is so uncouth these days.

Missed you at AMVIV, my love, pray tell how, is your rolling MINI BOOMBOX ?

You haven't posted any updates?
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 03:21 PM
  #21  
r52pimp's Avatar
r52pimp
Banned
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
My box is good. How is your box?
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2010 | 03:21 PM
  #22  
hollis3's Avatar
hollis3
Coordinator :: Motoring Underground Club Forum
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: North County San Diego
Originally Posted by r52pimp
Probably out driving over the speed limit. On public streets. Cretans.
Originally Posted by firenewt
In school zones.............
i hear they kick puppies.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2010 | 06:27 PM
  #23  
lotsie's Avatar
lotsie
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,382
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Motor On
I don't know it's been kind of quiet lately, almost like they're all out sewing or something.
The Nuts are all coming here to the sewing site, who would of ever figured that would happen.

Mark
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2010 | 06:32 PM
  #24  
lotsie's Avatar
lotsie
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,382
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Motor On
Might I suggest you check out this SoCal based MINI club.
http://www.mininuts.com/forum/index.php?a=forum&f=2

On NAM, however, all the guidelines will continue to apply on all the forums.
I though links to other MINI sites got your pee pee smacked on this site

Mark
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2010 | 06:43 PM
  #25  
Motor On's Avatar
Motor On
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,848
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by lotsie
I though links to other MINI sites got your pee pee smacked on this site

Mark
Well as I've explained to you personally multiple times, spamming members with competing knock-off websites that have been expressly prohibited due to the actions of their members and leadership are prohibited as per....
NO OTHER SITES
Advertising of products or solicitation of traffic for other websites is forbidden without prior express written permission from North American Motoring staff.
Not to mention spamming new members with links to other forums is widely considered poor netiquette.

However members are encouraged to seek out their local clubs, many of which are listed on the main forums page. And many other forums, including MINI2, MotoringUnderground, minicooperforum, miniforum are frequently linked to when doing so is of benefit to the community.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:26 AM.