R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (R56) hatchback discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

R56 R56 Unimpressive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 11:38 PM
  #76  
MINIclo's Avatar
MINIclo
7th Gear Gal
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 36,087
Likes: 3
From: Weeblegabber West (aka WLA)
Originally Posted by Ken Cooper
After reading all this, the one question that comes to my mind is: With JCW and/or other engine/suspension modifications, do you folks think the R56 could be modified to where it sounds and feels more like an R53? Do you think it could ultimately offer enough of that 'seat of the pants' experience to where although you who wouldn't consider a stock R56 right now, you might be tempted by one that has been 'toughened up' with, for instance, a JCW package?

I ask because it seems to me that although you R50/53 folks aren't real fond of the cosmetic changes, what's really important to you is the driving experience.
Great questions, Ken. I, for one, am interested in what JCW, Dinan, and the tuners come up with to modify the R56. I am reserving judgment on the R56 until I have had a chance to drive one or two, pre-mods.

In the meantime, I am very happy for those of you awaiting your new MINIs. It's a wonderful adventure when one gets to spec out their dream MINI. I hope these debates haven't taken away from yours or anyone else's enjoyment of their great new cars.

And for those of you with your new R56s, happy motoring!
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 08:45 AM
  #77  
srfrman7's Avatar
srfrman7
3rd Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Great thread.. thanks
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 08:57 AM
  #78  
sequence's Avatar
sequence
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 3
From: Your Worst Nightmare :)
Originally Posted by Skuzzy
High powered front drive cars are not fun to me. The MCS I test drove was a bit scary to hold in its lane while really stirring through the gears.
Hmmm. I got the same impression withe the mcs I demo'd, it was like driving an Integra/RSX type S or GTI or some other hot FWD car with all that ANNOYING torque steer barely evident in R53. Of course there are those on this forum that say "it's no biggie," or "I didnt notice," but 9 times out of 10 they're coming from heavily modded or JCW MCSs.

I really hope that when the JCW version comes out in a couple years that BMW considers awd (according to my MA, this could be a reality) because fwd with a 230 hp+ car and equal (or more) torque, to me, would be undriveable. If not, well then I see a V-8 M3 in my future....
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 09:16 AM
  #79  
Robin Casady's Avatar
Robin Casady
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 4
From: Paradise
Originally Posted by MINIclo
Robin, why don't you test-drive an R53? I've taken my 2003 MCS on an annual cross-country trip, in which I often drive 10+ hours a day, every year since '03. It is VERY comfortable. And I am over 50...not a young gal. (Well, am very young at heart when motoring in my MINI.)

On rough roads, most cars will not be that comfy, unless you are in a big couch-mobile with zero road-feel. I think it would be worth your while to try the R53 just for the comparison. BTW, I have nothing at all against the R56, and may even add one to my fleet at some point. However, I plan to hold onto my R53....it is a keeper.
I'm thinking about it, but there may be no point. Even if I liked the driving feel better, the differences in engines would probably stop me from switching to an R53. Is yours an S? What mileage do you get? The EPA numbers are something like 25 mpg city, 32 hwy. Real world use usually gets lower than EPA numbers. Compare that to a more powerful engine getting 28-31 mpg (based on user reports here). Most of my cars have been decent handling, but under powered. It would be fun to have something that is more of a pocket rocket for a change. And to be able to have that without eco-guilt inducing mpg is very appealing.

It isn't that the R56 handles badly. It handles very well. With the coaching of the MA I took a circular on-ramp at a fairly high speed and was very impressed with how the R56 handled it. My friend who drives an $85K Porsche and has raced the small formula cars at Sears Point and Laguna Seca was quite impressed. The R56 didn't seem to compromise much in ultimate handling, it just seemed less go-cart like than I expected.

If I drive an R53 and find it does have considerably more of that go-cart feel to the handling, I'll be very torn between the two. There are a lot of things I like about the R56 I would probably have to give up to go with an R53.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 09:37 AM
  #80  
sequence's Avatar
sequence
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 3
From: Your Worst Nightmare :)
Originally Posted by Robin Casady
If I drive an R53 and find it does have considerably more of that go-cart feel to the handling, I'll be very torn between the two. There are a lot of things I like about the R56 I would probably have to give up to go with an R53.
think of it this way: R53 has it's rough edges and charms with its Rover roots, while R56 is more "refined" and all-BMW. I didn't notice any difference in the "go-kart" handling because I was too busy dealing with the torque steer And if you find you like R53 better, now's the time to try and get one because dealers are discounting them anywhere for $600-$1,500 to move 'em off their lots.

Then U could join the exclusive "I got a nice discount off MSRP on my new MSC" club. And don't let the "You're buying a year-old car" naysayers discourage you because with the MCSs outstanding resale value, this is moot, and might save you a few $$ on registration and plates.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 10:36 AM
  #81  
lava's Avatar
lava
5th Gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 1
From: merchantville, nj
The R50/53's at below MRSP right now are a once in a lifetime opportunity. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there has never been a chance to get one like this before.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 10:47 AM
  #82  
sequence's Avatar
sequence
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 3
From: Your Worst Nightmare :)
Originally Posted by lava
The R50/53's at below MRSP right now are a once in a lifetime opportunity. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there has never been a chance to get one like this before.
Generally, you are right. The only time I've ever seen a new, non-demo, stock (not heavy with JCW or dealer accessories) R50/53 discounted off MSRP is when my dealer celebrated 65 years in the business last year, and then it was only $500 off MSRP. I've heard of cabrios being discounted some in colder climes as winter approached, but that's about it.

One guarantee: The 2006s will be gone shortly, because the end of the month--and quarter--is approaching, and they might get some further discounts (or be more willing to negotiate) to move them out! Now is the chance, if one doesn't mind a pre-specc'd car.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 11:38 AM
  #83  
reelsmith.'s Avatar
reelsmith.
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,010
Likes: 11
From: Ridgefield, CT
Originally Posted by Robin Casady
If I drive an R53 and find it does have considerably more of that go-cart feel to the handling, I'll be very torn between the two. There are a lot of things I like about the R56 I would probably have to give up to go with an R53.
Robin, I agree with MINIclo, you owe it to yourself to drive the R53 and make an informed decision. I did exactly that and bought an R53 ...it suits me better than the R56.

What the others have said about discounts is true ...they are out there.

Of course, savings are meaningless unless its the car you want. I suggest you drive an R53 ...whether you like it or not it will help you decide which of the two cars is right for you. Its a win-win situation.

And if you want a DS/B MCS R56 with Sports Package, sunroof, upgrade sound system, etc ...I know where you can get one without having to wait !

Best of luck to you. I'll tell you the same thing a lot of folks told me when I was struggling with the decision ...either way, you can't got wrong and either way you will always question your decision.

dean.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 11:48 AM
  #84  
Ken Cooper's Avatar
Ken Cooper
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
(deleted)
 

Last edited by Ken Cooper; Mar 20, 2007 at 12:02 PM. Reason: Don't want to generate more flames.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 11:54 AM
  #85  
C4's Avatar
C4
Banned
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,756
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ken Cooper
2nd string in a week where there's an all-out effort on this R56 forum to convince a potential R56 customer to buy an R53. The last one was successful. Heck, at this rate maybe you can force BMW to withdraw the R56, get some sense in their heads, and do some minor changes to the R53 and sell it as a 2007.

That seems to bother you a lot, doesn't it Kenny ?
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 11:55 AM
  #86  
reelsmith.'s Avatar
reelsmith.
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,010
Likes: 11
From: Ridgefield, CT
Originally Posted by Ken Cooper
2nd string in a week where there's an all-out effort on this R56 forum to convince a potential R56 customer to buy an R53. The last one was successful. Heck, at this rate maybe you can force BMW to withdraw the R56, get some sense in their heads, and do some minor changes to the R53 and sell it as a 2007.
Just for the record ...I am not trying to sway anyone one way or the other. I just think everyone should make an informed decision.

dean.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 12:00 PM
  #87  
Ken Cooper's Avatar
Ken Cooper
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by C4
That seems to bother you a lot, doesn't it Kenny ?
Yeah. But to divert the possibility of this really good string turning into another flamer I'll modify my post.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 12:06 PM
  #88  
C4's Avatar
C4
Banned
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,756
Likes: 0
Way to go.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 12:07 PM
  #89  
C4's Avatar
C4
Banned
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,756
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by reelsmith.
Just for the record ...I am not trying to sway anyone one way or the other. I just think everyone should make an informed decision.

dean.

Amen.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 12:41 PM
  #90  
Skuzzy's Avatar
Skuzzy
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,550
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Different strokes for different folks. I test drive both and liked the 07 Cooper better. I keep hearing about it being a new car and that in of itself is reason to be cautious, but I bought a ground-up redesign Lexus IS within 30 days of it starting to ship.

Had one recall in the last 15 months, for the seat belts. Other than that the car has been wonderful. I figure if Lexus can do it, why not BMW/Mini?
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #91  
fms's Avatar
fms
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
It's fun to read the different takes on the R53 v R56. If the full JCW option had been available on the R56, I would have waited to hear from some folks re: performance between the two. The only thing which could have made me wait would have been a considerable horsepower upgrade in a JCW R56 and having it available before '08. Otherwise, for what I paid, I could have gotten a slightly used M3- too smooth a ride for me. I'm not sorry in the least, and regardless of the steep ticket of a full JCW R53, there simply isn't another car w/ the performance, flexibility and options available at that price.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 04:43 PM
  #92  
slag1911's Avatar
slag1911
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
There are precious few new R53's left. For enthusiast that are in the market, now is the time to jump. Once these are gone, I suspect the used R53 market to stay high, as folks realize the terrific and unique value these cars offer...
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #93  
MY4thMINI's Avatar
MY4thMINI
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland OHIO
THANKS mbcoops
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 05:25 PM
  #94  
lava's Avatar
lava
5th Gear
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 1
From: merchantville, nj
Nah - no conspiracy. I just think its a rare moment when you can actually get a brand new cooper for under MRSP. 50~53~56 - you could not go wrong.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 05:29 PM
  #95  
C4's Avatar
C4
Banned
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,756
Likes: 0
2009 R56 "Facelift"



* Agressive
* Masculine
* Complies with EU Pedestrian safety regulations
* Looks mad all the time
* Sexy roof curving at the back

Anytakers?
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 05:35 PM
  #96  
C4's Avatar
C4
Banned
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,756
Likes: 0
Guess what?



The R56 taken to new hights of.....
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 05:39 PM
  #97  
Robin Casady's Avatar
Robin Casady
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 4
From: Paradise
Originally Posted by C4
2009 R56 "Facelift"



* Agressive
* Masculine
* Complies with EU Pedestrian safety regulations
* Looks mad all the time
* Sexy roof curving at the back

Anytakers?
It might make a nice little car, but it has lost a lot of the Mini charm. The roofline of the Mini is signature. Mess with that and it loses its Mininess.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 05:43 PM
  #98  
Homme's Avatar
Homme
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by C4
2009 R56 "Facelift"



* Agressive
* Masculine
* Complies with EU Pedestrian safety regulations
* Looks mad all the time
* Sexy roof curving at the back

Anytakers?
That's...ugly.

At least they've finally figured out that to have an 'aggressive' looking car, you need to keep the headlights pointing forward, and away from the outside edges.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 05:46 PM
  #99  
msh441's Avatar
msh441
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by C4
2009 R56 "Facelift"

* Agressive
* Masculine
* Complies with EU Pedestrian safety regulations
* Looks mad all the time
* Sexy roof curving at the back

Anytakers?
No thanks. Not yet, at least. Too much change. Maybe in 20015-17? That's even MORE overhang in the front. More un-MINI than the mild changes in the R56...and the sloping back. No. You'd have even more people dis-liking the radical departure from the current car. I think MINI has a plan to make more subtle changes keeping the small box concept in tact. So the regular person just really can't tell much difference each year. Ya know?

The next pic looks to FJ-ish. I guess if MINI wants a crossover market vehicle it would be possible. If it was small enough it could be interesting, though.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #100  
dave's Avatar
dave
pug poo picker-upper
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,803
Likes: 30
From: California
Originally Posted by C4
2009 R56 "Facelift"
More like a 2004 design student's clay model, not an official concept from MINI. Given the timeframe, it had nothing to do with the R56.

 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:17 PM.