R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (R56) hatchback discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

R56 R53 versus R56... a visual study

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 10:14 AM
  #101  
gokartride's Avatar
gokartride
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 38,578
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by GRMPer
Looks to me like much of the length difference is in the front overhang...
I believe there's a bit added to the rear, too.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 03:51 PM
  #102  
chopper's Avatar
chopper
1st Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
I think we'll all get where we won't hate the looks of the new car at some point, that being said, don't insult us with a phoney hood scoop! If all those eng. at BMW can't figure out how to make it actually function to the benefit of performance, leave it off. While I really like the look on our current car, as a performance enthusiast I'm embarrased that they put that on the car with no purpose! On the inside; I don't think I can ever warm up to the new dash if looks like the pre-prod. photos! It's lost the character of the current model. I haven't seen any real good shots of the seats, but the one I did see seems as they may have improved them, we'll see! Hope the stitching on the English Seats is better. I did like the toggle switches in the overhead console! As far as the new engine, only time will tell. I've owned a 280z turbo, Conquest TSi, 930 Turbo, 300ZX Twin Turbo and a Buick Limited T-Type and had good luck with all those motors, however I really liked the 5.0 GT car I built with a SC. I think a SC whine seems more pleasing to the ears, but thats me. Quality Control will be the "Name Of The Game" for the new car.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 04:02 PM
  #103  
MSFITOY's Avatar
MSFITOY
OVERDRIVE
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 40
From: Greensboro, NC
That's what I think is special about the current gen MCS...SC...how many production cars today have SC vs. Turbo? "Not that there's anything wrong with that"...but, Blowers Rock!!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 12:22 AM
  #104  
justintime's Avatar
justintime
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,184
Likes: 0
From: bryan tx
I think its one of those styles that grows on people. Granted now the older MCS looks cleaner but I can tell that might change the more I look at them
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 08:44 AM
  #105  
erickvonzipper's Avatar
erickvonzipper
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
From: LI, NY
That very well may be true, but the R53 just hit me like a ton o' bricks when I saw it. The R56 is just another car, imho.
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 08:52 AM
  #106  
biz's Avatar
biz
2nd Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
well, i like it that they are bringing back the yellow color
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 05:49 PM
  #107  
msh441's Avatar
msh441
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Interesting evaluations of the 2007's. I went through the same thing when (the new) Triumph motorcycles went away from the georgeous T595/955i bodies (with the single sided swingarm) to the very-japanese looking angular 955i Daytona with the two-sided boxy rear end. This won't make any sence to those outside of the euro-sport bike community, but the bottom line is, I get it... but times change as do designs.

I'm still going to buy a 2007. I'm on the waiting list and waiting to solidify the details and accessories. There are a couple of things I don't like about the 2007 S pictured: Fake scoop!?! C'mon, make it do SOMETHING or get rid of it! Plus the winshield wiper tray on the new car looks cheesy.

I am willing to settle for these design two questionable charactoristics, though... especially when the suggested performace gains on the new, lighter TURBO car are looking pretty appealing.

I am however crossing my fingers that some restyling and re-enginering is done before the assembaly line starts cranking them out.

We'll see, I guess.
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #108  
mcarlo52's Avatar
mcarlo52
4th Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: East Bay, CA
I remember when the MINI was still in the "rumor" phase (2000?) and we were seeing possible styles before the offical release. The style I really liked (which knocked my socks off) was not the one chosen and while disappointed, I was still very pleased with the final result. Now that I can finally buy one, I'm choosing the 2007. I'm not thrilled with all the changes (ditto msh441, the hood scoop and wiper tray), the turbo with it's increased HP and MPG along with the front grille and rear bumper make this version very appealling to me. My name's on the list and I'll be one of the first group to get a 2007 MCS here in Bay Area.
 
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2006 | 08:20 PM
  #109  
Griff's Avatar
Griff
2nd Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, VA
After seeing these pictures we are glad we ordered an 2006.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 07:21 AM
  #110  
COOPERation's Avatar
COOPERation
Thread Starter
|
Burbling since 2002
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
From: USA
A few more comparison shots with some of the latest press shots...





Note...some of the photos have been flipped and rotated for comparison reasons, nothing has been edited within the content of each photo.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 02:28 PM
  #111  
erickvonzipper's Avatar
erickvonzipper
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
From: LI, NY
OMG, there is no comparison, now that the new cars are fully revealed. The 53's grace and style has been abandoned on the 56.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #112  
fjork_duf's Avatar
fjork_duf
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 739
Likes: 9
The new '07 mini is awesome

I'm glad I waited. I really like the look of the new car. Interior etc.. also now that it is 22lbs lighter and the fuel economy is so much better I'm just really glad I waited.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 05:36 PM
  #113  
justintime's Avatar
justintime
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,184
Likes: 0
From: bryan tx
it looks good. exhaust on the left now?
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 07:06 PM
  #114  
WEEGIT's Avatar
WEEGIT
2nd Gear
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Yea, and they decided to spell Cooper backwards and put it on the left side too That way the masses can tell the difference
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 07:24 PM
  #115  
StompRocket's Avatar
StompRocket
2nd Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
A couple of things come to my mind now that the '07 is fully revealed...

1. "My what big ears you have!"
2. Botox

I hope the '07 grows on me because it won't change again anytime soon!
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 07:37 PM
  #116  
camelpilot's Avatar
camelpilot
Banned
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 1
From: City of Angels, Cali
This new car reminds me of the story of the Emporer's New Clothes.

CANT YOU PEOPLE SEE HOW HIDEOUS THIS CAR IS????

FOR THEM TO CALL IT THE SAME NAME AS MINE IS JUST BLASPHEMY!
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 07:38 PM
  #117  
resmini's Avatar
resmini
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
Looks like the Cooper is getting the Cooper "S" side skirts.

That's an improvment IMO.
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 07:54 PM
  #118  
msh441's Avatar
msh441
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
It doesn't look as bad now that all the masking tape is off. The headlightls are noticably rotated to the sides and the hoods doesn't have as many beautiful curves... It looks a little tall and bulbous... but none of it appears to be anything that a set of 18" BBS 2-piece rims and a 1-1 and 1/2 inch drop on Koni or H&R springs wont fix!
 
Reply
Old Aug 14, 2006 | 08:48 PM
  #119  
justintime's Avatar
justintime
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,184
Likes: 0
From: bryan tx
well I dont like how the humps on the hood are pretty much gone. thats what made the mini all euro and unique to me. the cooper reminds me of a neon now kinda.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 12:04 PM
  #120  
vladimir's Avatar
vladimir
3rd Gear
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield County, CT
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 12:11 PM
  #121  
MSFITOY's Avatar
MSFITOY
OVERDRIVE
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 40
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by vladimir
Absolutely. I could not have said this better myself!

In almost every way, this car seems to betray what the original design was about. The emphasis, (the INSISTENCE!), THAT
that what?
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 12:18 PM
  #122  
vladimir's Avatar
vladimir
3rd Gear
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield County, CT
Originally Posted by camelpilot
This new car reminds me of the story of the Emporer's New Clothes.

CANT YOU PEOPLE SEE HOW HIDEOUS THIS CAR IS????

FOR THEM TO CALL IT THE SAME NAME AS MINE IS JUST BLASPHEMY!
Absolutely. I could not have said this better myself!

In almost every way, this car seems to betray what the original design was about. The emphasis, (the INSISTENCE!), that every aspect of the car be changed, made bigger, wider, longer, etc., is so disturbing. I have never had the slightest issue with front seat room, (I am 6'2"), regardless of my passenger. Yet this new design team has tossed the interior with the charge to increase room in every direction, (and so doing, created a dash which I feel will become forgetable very quickly), enlarged the lights, (very ugly, particularly in the rear), blown up (and disturbed) its exterior proportions, and increased boot space. I DON'T NEED OR WANT increased boot space! The MINI is what it is! This team should have taken some time to try and UNDERSTAND the Mini heritage and what the car was created to accomplish! The R53 is already big enough, (and several years on, has been copied by so many manufacturers-- and in some cases, pretty well, too-- and is no longer the shortest/smallest car on the road as it was a couple of years back), adding to that is such a shame, and an ignorance of what made it so special, so appealing, (so British?), and yes, so cute, (even if that is not part of what an "S" owner is after!). The original design team endured endless work (and "combat" with the various safety/design engineering teams) to keep the new MINI as small as possible. Meanwhile, the "face" of the car is diminished, (comon, that's undeniable!!), the "grill" reduced, (what? shrink one of the most ichonic features of the car??), and looks cheapened by moving the running/turn indicators into the headlight cluster). The R56 seems so geared toward broadening the sales base of the car, and it will probably do that. For me, I am terribly sad at all this, I've owned two (02/05) and unfortunately cannot replace my current car now, there is not enough time.

No, camelpilot has this one accurately portrayed.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 12:32 PM
  #123  
MSFITOY's Avatar
MSFITOY
OVERDRIVE
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,926
Likes: 40
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by vladimir
Absolutely. I could not have said this better myself!

In almost every way, this car seems to betray what the original design was about. The emphasis, (the INSISTENCE!), that every aspect of the car be changed, made bigger, wider, longer, etc., is so disturbing. I have never had the slightest issue with front seat room, (I am 6'2"), regardless of my passenger. Yet this new design team has tossed the interior with the charge to increase room in every direction, (and so doing, created a dash which I feel will become forgetable very quickly), enlarged the lights, (very ugly, particularly in the rear), blown up (and disturbed) its exterior proportions, and increased boot space. I DON'T NEED OR WANT increased boot space! The MINI is what it is! This team should have taken some time to try and UNDERSTAND the Mini heritage and what the car was created to accomplish! The R53 is already big enough, (and several years on, has been copied by so many manufacturers-- and in some cases, pretty well, too-- and is no longer the shortest/smallest car on the road as it was a couple of years back), adding to that is such a shame, and an ignorance of what made it so special, so appealing, (so British?), and yes, so cute, (even if that is not part of what an "S" owner is after!). The original design team endured endless work (and "combat" with the various safety/design engineering teams) to keep the new MINI as small as possible. Meanwhile, the "face" of the car is diminished, (comon, that's undeniable!!), the "grill" reduced, (what? shrink one of the most ichonic features of the car??), and looks cheapened by moving the running/turn indicators into the headlight cluster). The R56 seems so geared toward broadening the sales base of the car, and it will probably do that. For me, I am terribly sad at all this, I've owned two (02/05) and unfortunately cannot replace my current car now, there is not enough time.

No, camelpilot has this one accurately portrayed.
Care to comment in my thread?

https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...d+dead+fingers
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 03:07 PM
  #124  
Rachmunas's Avatar
Rachmunas
Neutral
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
I personally love the present look which can never get old as we all know. I always aknowledge every Mini I see (which is a lot).. I also think the new look is sleeker and more modern looking. I have been holding off on the Mini since seeing the first 07' pics and will stand by this. But everyone has their own opinion's of course.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 04:01 PM
  #125  
resmini's Avatar
resmini
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by camelpilot
CANT YOU PEOPLE SEE HOW HIDEOUS THIS CAR IS????
Nope, I can't, I like it a lot and fully expect to love it after the first drive.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:56 PM.