R56 Here we go, R56 Overhaul...
#26
Hey Kalibdor
I know you've gone cleaned up the carbon build up and it seemed to help you with that dreaded code.
I also have the BSH catch can, and it seems to have a kink in the tube that goes to the catch can. Do you guys think that could be causing the code as well? When there isn't enough oil being driven to the can? I'm one step closer to just replacing the turbo. There definitely is a lot of carbon build up.
I know you've gone cleaned up the carbon build up and it seemed to help you with that dreaded code.
I also have the BSH catch can, and it seems to have a kink in the tube that goes to the catch can. Do you guys think that could be causing the code as well? When there isn't enough oil being driven to the can? I'm one step closer to just replacing the turbo. There definitely is a lot of carbon build up.
When's the last time you had a proper carbon cleaning done (i.e. walnut blasting or something equally as extensive)? It might be a good idea to just get that checked out and see if it's needed. Are you getting the code in any particular gear/speed or under a certain amount of engine load?
#27
Hey Kalibdor
I know you've gone cleaned up the carbon build up and it seemed to help you with that dreaded code.
I also have the BSH catch can, and it seems to have a kink in the tube that goes to the catch can. Do you guys think that could be causing the code as well? When there isn't enough oil being driven to the can? I'm one step closer to just replacing the turbo. There definitely is a lot of carbon build up.
I know you've gone cleaned up the carbon build up and it seemed to help you with that dreaded code.
I also have the BSH catch can, and it seems to have a kink in the tube that goes to the catch can. Do you guys think that could be causing the code as well? When there isn't enough oil being driven to the can? I'm one step closer to just replacing the turbo. There definitely is a lot of carbon build up.
#28
17.6 PSI should be fine with the stock diverter valves... Why do people change them? All I ever read is boost cuts/error codes/reduced performance with most people running after market valves...
Do not block off the PCV line to the inlet manifold if you are running higher boost. I did and the car drank 3 litres of oil in one month and performance was reduced. I also know a friend who had issues running higher boost with the second line blanked off. peugeot in the uk do it on their cars but they run quite a bit less boost, MINI I assume for the reasons I mentioned do not endorse this method.
Install 2 catch cans with the shortest possible route from the can to the inlet and outlet points.
Make sure you change the oil every 6,000 miles or 6 months, whatever comes sooner. Spark plugs at least once a year. Walnut Blasting is now being offered in the UK for $400ish so not too bad so a clean once a year or two years should keep the car perfectly healthy.
Hope that helps.
Do not block off the PCV line to the inlet manifold if you are running higher boost. I did and the car drank 3 litres of oil in one month and performance was reduced. I also know a friend who had issues running higher boost with the second line blanked off. peugeot in the uk do it on their cars but they run quite a bit less boost, MINI I assume for the reasons I mentioned do not endorse this method.
Install 2 catch cans with the shortest possible route from the can to the inlet and outlet points.
Make sure you change the oil every 6,000 miles or 6 months, whatever comes sooner. Spark plugs at least once a year. Walnut Blasting is now being offered in the UK for $400ish so not too bad so a clean once a year or two years should keep the car perfectly healthy.
Hope that helps.
#29
17.6 PSI should be fine with the stock diverter valves... Why do people change them? All I ever read is boost cuts/error codes/reduced performance with most people running after market valves...
Do not block off the PCV line to the inlet manifold if you are running higher boost. I did and the car drank 3 litres of oil in one month and performance was reduced. I also know a friend who had issues running higher boost with the second line blanked off. peugeot in the uk do it on their cars but they run quite a bit less boost, MINI I assume for the reasons I mentioned do not endorse this method.
Install 2 catch cans with the shortest possible route from the can to the inlet and outlet points.
Make sure you change the oil every 6,000 miles or 6 months, whatever comes sooner. Spark plugs at least once a year. Walnut Blasting is now being offered in the UK for $400ish so not too bad so a clean once a year or two years should keep the car perfectly healthy.
Hope that helps.
Do not block off the PCV line to the inlet manifold if you are running higher boost. I did and the car drank 3 litres of oil in one month and performance was reduced. I also know a friend who had issues running higher boost with the second line blanked off. peugeot in the uk do it on their cars but they run quite a bit less boost, MINI I assume for the reasons I mentioned do not endorse this method.
Install 2 catch cans with the shortest possible route from the can to the inlet and outlet points.
Make sure you change the oil every 6,000 miles or 6 months, whatever comes sooner. Spark plugs at least once a year. Walnut Blasting is now being offered in the UK for $400ish so not too bad so a clean once a year or two years should keep the car perfectly healthy.
Hope that helps.
#30
I am running a low boost map (I am in the UK) and the max boost I see is 17.6 PSI, stock turbo, manifold, diverter and spring. I have no issues with boost cuts. Some cars in the UK are mapped to dangerous levels on stock turbo's and internals hitting 21/22 PSI and running power that even the JCW turbo is not rated to. Many have boost cuts or destroy their turbo's and some have even seen engine failure, not necessarily down to the map but it contributes to it.
With your boost levels you don't need to change the diverter valve spring.
On the stock R56 turbo I don't recommend pushing past 18PSI. People in the UK who are now pushing towards 300bhp have reported issues with the conrod bolts stretching and the conrods being the weak point.
Once you get all the carbon cleaned out you should see a bit more power... Some people have reported 20bhp gained just from having all the carbon removed.
As for the OCC, yes, one from the inlet manifold and also one from the turbo. However, achieving this with the stock/jcw airbox will be a tight fit...
Some people in the UK are running these:
Its a good idea but not the optimal setup.
With your boost levels you don't need to change the diverter valve spring.
On the stock R56 turbo I don't recommend pushing past 18PSI. People in the UK who are now pushing towards 300bhp have reported issues with the conrod bolts stretching and the conrods being the weak point.
Once you get all the carbon cleaned out you should see a bit more power... Some people have reported 20bhp gained just from having all the carbon removed.
As for the OCC, yes, one from the inlet manifold and also one from the turbo. However, achieving this with the stock/jcw airbox will be a tight fit...
Some people in the UK are running these:
Its a good idea but not the optimal setup.
#31
#32
I am running a low boost map (I am in the UK) and the max boost I see is 17.6 PSI, stock turbo, manifold, diverter and spring. I have no issues with boost cuts. Some cars in the UK are mapped to dangerous levels on stock turbo's and internals hitting 21/22 PSI and running power that even the JCW turbo is not rated to. Many have boost cuts or destroy their turbo's and some have even seen engine failure, not necessarily down to the map but it contributes to it.
With your boost levels you don't need to change the diverter valve spring.
On the stock R56 turbo I don't recommend pushing past 18PSI. People in the UK who are now pushing towards 300bhp have reported issues with the conrod bolts stretching and the conrods being the weak point.
With your boost levels you don't need to change the diverter valve spring.
On the stock R56 turbo I don't recommend pushing past 18PSI. People in the UK who are now pushing towards 300bhp have reported issues with the conrod bolts stretching and the conrods being the weak point.
I'll look into the dual occ setup. Haven't had too crazy of oil consumption since the pcv blockoff yet, but we'll see. I tend to change my oil more frequently than 6k miles just to be safe.
#33
Turbo replacement difficulty
Kalibdor,
Can you tell me is the turbo replacement itself was much of a challenge? I just replaced my n14 engine on my 07 MCS. I'm getting an engine light at WOT and the dealer first said it was a bad BOV and now, since a new BOV didn't work, they want me to replace the rebuilt turbo. I can't afford the $800 labor and can't imagine it will be that hard. My turbo supplier is really helping me out looking for a new turbo.
Any advice?
Thanks,
Alden
Can you tell me is the turbo replacement itself was much of a challenge? I just replaced my n14 engine on my 07 MCS. I'm getting an engine light at WOT and the dealer first said it was a bad BOV and now, since a new BOV didn't work, they want me to replace the rebuilt turbo. I can't afford the $800 labor and can't imagine it will be that hard. My turbo supplier is really helping me out looking for a new turbo.
Any advice?
Thanks,
Alden
#34
Have you all considered changing to the new valve cover from the N18 engine? My understanding is it supercedes the old cover and really cures the oil usage problem.
I don't think doing that is any more expensive than 2 catch cans, might even be less.
Oh, and my daughter and her husband both graduated from SCAD - it's a good school.
I don't think doing that is any more expensive than 2 catch cans, might even be less.
Oh, and my daughter and her husband both graduated from SCAD - it's a good school.
#35
Kalibdor,
Can you tell me is the turbo replacement itself was much of a challenge? I just replaced my n14 engine on my 07 MCS. I'm getting an engine light at WOT and the dealer first said it was a bad BOV and now, since a new BOV didn't work, they want me to replace the rebuilt turbo. I can't afford the $800 labor and can't imagine it will be that hard. My turbo supplier is really helping me out looking for a new turbo.
Any advice?
Thanks,
Alden
Can you tell me is the turbo replacement itself was much of a challenge? I just replaced my n14 engine on my 07 MCS. I'm getting an engine light at WOT and the dealer first said it was a bad BOV and now, since a new BOV didn't work, they want me to replace the rebuilt turbo. I can't afford the $800 labor and can't imagine it will be that hard. My turbo supplier is really helping me out looking for a new turbo.
Any advice?
Thanks,
Alden
When I replaced my turbo, there were other parts changed that required more disassembly than you should need, but consider removing the front end to minimize the wear and tear on your knuckles. You should also consider getting a copy of the Bentley manual, if you're not real familiar with your Mini --- it sounds like you had the engine replacement done by someone else. If you did it yourself, the turbo should be a cakewalk.
#36
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colt45Magnus
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
23
09-14-2015 03:12 AM