R56 2009 Traction Control Shenanigans?
Thanks, the MiniUSA website is a bit confusing. Under the new DTC option the description is "Perfect for agressive driving, 2009 MINI's will allow drivers to turn DSC+DTC off and grant more responsibility to the pilot."
This makes it seem like you have to buy DTC in order to turn off DSC and DTC. I'm fine with having the now standard DSC as long as you can fully turn it off. The description says that it cuts engine output and applies brakes to spinning wheels etc which I do not want to any extent. Just plain old mechanical LSD is good for me as it will be a SCCA G-stock autocross car.
Also does the now standard DSC still give you the hill assist?
This makes it seem like you have to buy DTC in order to turn off DSC and DTC. I'm fine with having the now standard DSC as long as you can fully turn it off. The description says that it cuts engine output and applies brakes to spinning wheels etc which I do not want to any extent. Just plain old mechanical LSD is good for me as it will be a SCCA G-stock autocross car.
Also does the now standard DSC still give you the hill assist?
I suspect that the arrangement would be similar for DTC, which is too bad. You would probably want DSC off for AutoX, but want DTC on for better acceleration.
The way the current models work is that ASC (current traction control) is controlled by the same button that turns off DSC. So, if you don't have DSC, this button turns ASC off or on. If you have both, the one button turns them both on or off. It would be much better if they were separate, so you could have one on and the other off.
I suspect that the arrangement would be similar for DTC, which is too bad. You would probably want DSC off for AutoX, but want DTC on for better acceleration.
I suspect that the arrangement would be similar for DTC, which is too bad. You would probably want DSC off for AutoX, but want DTC on for better acceleration.

We currently run a super stock class mid engine rear wheel drive Lotus Elise that pulls over 1G on Hoosier A6's. If I don't need any electronic aids on that I certainly don't on a 170 hp FWD Mini.
Enough with the history lesson in safety devices. Both the girlfriend and I are experienced autocrossers at national level and have very good car control. We prefer to have no electronic traction/stability aids (except ABS obviously). All we want is a base model car with LSD and the ability to turn off electronic "saftey nets".
If you order a 09 with just the standard DSC can you turn it all the way off as it is or do you have to wait and order the stupid optional DTC to completely turn off both features. That's all I need to know.
If you order a 09 with just the standard DSC can you turn it all the way off as it is or do you have to wait and order the stupid optional DTC to completely turn off both features. That's all I need to know.
As of yesterday my dealership still has 5 slots open for 08 MCS before they get into their 09 allocations. Century Mini, Greenville SC.
Even if DSC can save you in an extreme circumstances, I don't want the government deciding that this be mandatory because it "protects us all."
Government has already gone too far in their quest to protect us from ourselves.
Government has already gone too far in their quest to protect us from ourselves.
Online configurations are only for the 2009 at the moment. I had to add the items separately and will wonder what the heck I get since it is not a December 2008 build with the new traction control system. (But I will have the LSD!)
I have a feeling you are correct. DTC is mostly software when they already have the DSC/TC hardware. So they will charge $$$ for something and get rid of an option that requires them to actually purchase from a supplier more hardware. Then the DTC becomes an almost pure profit option other than R&D costs.
Hello,
First a thank you to everyone for the great information here. I've spent many hours researching the car, and obsessing over every detail (I'm sure none of you know what that's like =P). The community here is yet another great thing about this car.
I was planning on ordering my Mini early next year, but one of the first options I specced for the car was LSD as I live in snow country (Denver, CO).
So here's the dilemma: order now to get a pre-December build and get LSD, or just order in the spring as planned and get DTC? From what I've gleaned from the Bimmer forums, it'd be a good idea to order early.
Any opinions?
First a thank you to everyone for the great information here. I've spent many hours researching the car, and obsessing over every detail (I'm sure none of you know what that's like =P). The community here is yet another great thing about this car.
I was planning on ordering my Mini early next year, but one of the first options I specced for the car was LSD as I live in snow country (Denver, CO).
So here's the dilemma: order now to get a pre-December build and get LSD, or just order in the spring as planned and get DTC? From what I've gleaned from the Bimmer forums, it'd be a good idea to order early.
Any opinions?
I went with the LSD, but that was for reasons unrelated to snow.
I'm in Boulder, so I understand your concern about traction. Maybe I'm impatient or overconfident (or both), but I felt pretty comfortable ordering before the DTC was available.
Yeah, I don't think that helped much.
I'm in Boulder, so I understand your concern about traction. Maybe I'm impatient or overconfident (or both), but I felt pretty comfortable ordering before the DTC was available. Yeah, I don't think that helped much.
Thanks for the response =).
I think I'll buy early. I'd like to at least try autocross at some point, and that makes the decision to order now before LSD goes away easier.
Unless someone comes up with an extremely compelling argument for DTC at least =P.
I think I'll buy early. I'd like to at least try autocross at some point, and that makes the decision to order now before LSD goes away easier.
Unless someone comes up with an extremely compelling argument for DTC at least =P.
If you're in snow country Denver, then I'd highly suggest that you get DTC. A compelling argument is found in this Fifth Gear segment on winter driving technology.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-hHWSQhKuc
Hell, I live in the desert, and I'm holding out for DTC. And, the DTC option gives you an off switch for those times that you don't want it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-hHWSQhKuc
Hell, I live in the desert, and I'm holding out for DTC. And, the DTC option gives you an off switch for those times that you don't want it.
Hmm. I had watched the episode, and what I gather is that DTC would be used for controlling wheel slip during acceleration by reducing power to wheels that are encountering slip. In the linked 5th gear episode, they demonstrated it by going up a 10% grade of sheet ice. The traction control system that enabled the car to salom around the obstacles is DSC.
The way I understand LSD to work is that if, for example, one wheel was on dry asphalt and the other was on sheet ice, the LSD would momentarily join the two wheels together, allowing the car to maintain traction via the wheel on asphalt. If you were cornering hard and the inside tire lost grip, the LSD would engage and link the two wheels together, increasing usable torque on the outer tire. I understand that this is likely a very very basic explanation =).
I've never had much problem getting forward traction on flat ice (just feather the clutch a bit, or just let it out very slowly without giving the car gas), so if given a choice between DTC or LSD, the choice seems clear.
Is my reasoning flawed? Am I not seeing something, or misunderstanding how something works?
The way I understand LSD to work is that if, for example, one wheel was on dry asphalt and the other was on sheet ice, the LSD would momentarily join the two wheels together, allowing the car to maintain traction via the wheel on asphalt. If you were cornering hard and the inside tire lost grip, the LSD would engage and link the two wheels together, increasing usable torque on the outer tire. I understand that this is likely a very very basic explanation =).
I've never had much problem getting forward traction on flat ice (just feather the clutch a bit, or just let it out very slowly without giving the car gas), so if given a choice between DTC or LSD, the choice seems clear.
Is my reasoning flawed? Am I not seeing something, or misunderstanding how something works?
Granted, I'm a schmuck who is easily impressed by video demos on TV... so perhaps I'm not the greatest authority on the issue.
Last edited by fishbert; Jul 24, 2008 at 06:56 PM.
Hmm. I had watched the episode, and what I gather is that DTC would be used for controlling wheel slip during acceleration by reducing power to wheels that are encountering slip. In the linked 5th gear episode, they demonstrated it by going up a 10% grade of sheet ice. The traction control system that enabled the car to salom around the obstacles is DSC.
The way I understand LSD to work is that if, for example, one wheel was on dry asphalt and the other was on sheet ice, the LSD would momentarily join the two wheels together, allowing the car to maintain traction via the wheel on asphalt. If you were cornering hard and the inside tire lost grip, the LSD would engage and link the two wheels together, increasing usable torque on the outer tire. I understand that this is likely a very very basic explanation =).
I've never had much problem getting forward traction on flat ice (just feather the clutch a bit, or just let it out very slowly without giving the car gas), so if given a choice between DTC or LSD, the choice seems clear.
Is my reasoning flawed? Am I not seeing something, or misunderstanding how something works?
The way I understand LSD to work is that if, for example, one wheel was on dry asphalt and the other was on sheet ice, the LSD would momentarily join the two wheels together, allowing the car to maintain traction via the wheel on asphalt. If you were cornering hard and the inside tire lost grip, the LSD would engage and link the two wheels together, increasing usable torque on the outer tire. I understand that this is likely a very very basic explanation =).
I've never had much problem getting forward traction on flat ice (just feather the clutch a bit, or just let it out very slowly without giving the car gas), so if given a choice between DTC or LSD, the choice seems clear.
Is my reasoning flawed? Am I not seeing something, or misunderstanding how something works?
ASC+T will reduce power to both wheels IF both wheels are spinning. If only one wheel is spinning it can use the brakes to reduce the spin on that wheel only. Thus maintaining engine power on the wheel with traction.
Now I'm not sure if the LSD would come into play before the individual braking that is slipping comes into or vice versa.
DSC is another layer on top of ASC+T that provides yaw control to a certain degree using additional sensors and ASC+T.
The way I see it, ASC+T and DSC are safety items. LSD and DTC are more performance items. DTC actually allows for more wheel spin and more slip angle (not sure if I am using the term correctly) before it will intervene.
I think one flaw may be the assumption that it will be a decision between DTC or LSD... if I remember correctly, this either/or scenario was mere speculation.
Granted, I'm a schmuck who is easily impressed by video demos on TV... so perhaps I'm not the greatest authority on the issue.
Granted, I'm a schmuck who is easily impressed by video demos on TV... so perhaps I'm not the greatest authority on the issue.
I agree, it was an impressive video =).
Last edited by Snowfarmer; Jul 24, 2008 at 08:02 PM.
ASC+T will reduce power to both wheels IF both wheels are spinning. If only one wheel is spinning it can use the brakes to reduce the spin on that wheel only. Thus maintaining engine power on the wheel with traction.
Now I'm not sure if the LSD would come into play before the individual braking that is slipping comes into or vice versa.
DSC is another layer on top of ASC+T that provides yaw control to a certain degree using additional sensors and ASC+T.
The way I see it, ASC+T and DSC are safety items. LSD and DTC are more performance items. DTC actually allows for more wheel spin and more slip angle (not sure if I am using the term correctly) before it will intervene.
Now I'm not sure if the LSD would come into play before the individual braking that is slipping comes into or vice versa.
DSC is another layer on top of ASC+T that provides yaw control to a certain degree using additional sensors and ASC+T.
The way I see it, ASC+T and DSC are safety items. LSD and DTC are more performance items. DTC actually allows for more wheel spin and more slip angle (not sure if I am using the term correctly) before it will intervene.
To my knowledge, they do not offer a aftermarket LSD on the newer R56's...as of yet... might be because the demand is not there yet due to the warranty period or the labor involved in cracking open a R56 transmission or waiting for the clutch to crap out to have a reason to get some LSD? I really don't know much about the demand in this market ...but I totally hear you that we are not limited that is of course as long as aftermarket alternatives are available.
Let's hope for those who did not get LSD (usually those who did not special order and instead purchased off the dealer lot) have the option to get it later in the future. You may need to take some "LSD" once you find out a $500 option turns into a $2000+ option down the road....
Oly
I agree..the fact that you can turn the system off is the best of both worlds..







