R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006) Cooper (R50) and Cooper S (R53) hatchback discussion.

R50/53 Buy a Cooper S from 2003 or a Cooper from 2005?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 08:56 AM
  #26  
minicooperwill's Avatar
minicooperwill
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by planeguy
That one way to look at it.......Buy every time I buy something I concider the true cost....The future value of the purchase and how it diminishes capacity to build wealth. That $3,000 if saved and invested for an 8% return, over the next 40 years is $65,000! Now, we can put that true cost into your formula and see that an extra $65 every drive is a bit much. Fortunately, I believe in driving a brand new car for at least 10years so I will have plenty of years and drives to disperse the added expense

I love my MINI, but to do over, I would probably get a MC instead of the MCS
I know my math was fuzzy, but your math needs a whole new term!! I was sticking with apples, but you're taking apples and multiplying them by bananas and dividing by oranges to come up with some crazy fruit-salad number logic. If he didn't buy a car at all and invested for 40 years he could have over $325,000. Using your math in "my formula" means it'd cost him $325 a day. Seems like there is something wrong when we do math your way, huh?
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 08:59 AM
  #27  
minicooperwill's Avatar
minicooperwill
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
....and if we are talking "true cost" we need to figure in how much money he is going to spend on gas, insurance, maintenance, car washes, time not spent finding investments where he'll get 8% a year for the next 40 years,... if he doesn't buy a car at all, look at what he'll save!
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 09:18 AM
  #28  
rgc0233's Avatar
rgc0233
2nd Gear
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Driving around San Jose
Which Mini?

Drive both models and pick the one YOU like best!
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #29  
itonano's Avatar
itonano
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Menorca Island, Spain
hi everyone, thanks so much for your reply, i will go finally for the MCS, because cost the same as it comes with all the extra, so i don't have to spend allot of money on them, and the non s coste the same with no extras, so that's my decision
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 09:57 AM
  #30  
minicooperwill's Avatar
minicooperwill
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by itonano
hi everyone, thanks so much for your reply, i will go finally for the MCS, because cost the same as it comes with all the extra, so i don't have to spend allot of money on them, and the non s coste the same with no extras, so that's my decision
Congrats! Be sure to post pictures!
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 02:14 PM
  #31  
Crashton's Avatar
Crashton
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 3
From: Over there on MA
Originally Posted by erickvonzipper
I drove a sport-suspensioned S before a Cooper and bought a Cooper (both new) because I still thought it was a great car. Less money outright, better gas mileage, and just as much fun to drive, imho.
Well I was sucked in by all of the sweet sweet power Mmmm.



Once gas price went through the roof I kinda wished I had a Cooper. But I'm still happy with that sweet sweet power.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 05:09 PM
  #32  
erickvonzipper's Avatar
erickvonzipper
6th Gear
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
From: LI, NY
Originally Posted by jbkoopa
i see everyone has their own little 2 cents added to this topic.
the s and non-s are essentially the same car. just a few differences.

s: more power (hp/tq) but [generally] less mpg simply cuz since people know they have the power they tend to stomp on the gas pedal more lol.

non-s: less power (hp/tq) but [generally] more mpg. people who have a non-s (like me lol) is eventually gonna stomp the pedal but only outta curiosity, thus most of the time they dont since they know its not gonna be as fast as an s.

another diff i s the engine. duh. bigger engine = more gas consumption.
hope that helps!
Aren't the S and the Cooper both 1.6's?

Also, even if you stomp the Cooper, you're gas mileage will still be more than if you stomp an S. You just won't go as fast.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 08:04 PM
  #33  
planeguy's Avatar
planeguy
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Kansas
Originally Posted by minicooperwill
I know my math was fuzzy, but your math needs a whole new term!! I was sticking with apples, but you're taking apples and multiplying them by bananas and dividing by oranges to come up with some crazy fruit-salad number logic. If he didn't buy a car at all and invested for 40 years he could have over $325,000. Using your math in "my formula" means it'd cost him $325 a day. Seems like there is something wrong when we do math your way, huh?
No....Its a very common calculation when making buisness decisions. and yes, making carpayments your whole life does cost about $325 a day.....Its actually about $376 a day. Anyway ....its called compund interest.
P = C (1 + r/n) nt
where
P = future value
C = initial deposit
r = interest rate (expressed as a fraction: eg. 0.06)
n = # of times per year interest in compounded
t = number of years invested

“Taking on a car payment is one of the dumbest things people do to destroy their chances of building wealth. The car payment is most folks’ largest payment except for their home mortgage, so it steals more money from the income than virtually anything else. USA Today notes that the average car payment is $464 over sixty-four months. Most people get a car payment and keep it throughout their lives. As soon as a car is paid off, they get another payment because they “need” a new car. If you keep a $464 car payment throughout your life, which is “normal,” you miss the opportunity to save that money. If you invested $464 per month from age 25 to 65, a normal working lifetime, in the average mutual fund averaging 12 percent (the seventy-year stock market average), you would have $5,458,854.45 at age sixty-five. Hope you like the car!” -D. Ramsey
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 08:43 PM
  #34  
minicooperwill's Avatar
minicooperwill
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by planeguy
No....Its a very common calculation when making buisness decisions. and yes, making carpayments your whole life does cost about $325 a day.....Its actually about $376 a day. Anyway ....its called compund interest.
P = C (1 + r/n) nt
where
P = future value
C = initial deposit
r = interest rate (expressed as a fraction: eg. 0.06)
n = # of times per year interest in compounded
t = number of years invested

“Taking on a car payment is one of the dumbest things people do to destroy their chances of building wealth. The car payment is most folks’ largest payment except for their home mortgage, so it steals more money from the income than virtually anything else. USA Today notes that the average car payment is $464 over sixty-four months. Most people get a car payment and keep it throughout their lives. As soon as a car is paid off, they get another payment because they “need” a new car. If you keep a $464 car payment throughout your life, which is “normal,” you miss the opportunity to save that money. If you invested $464 per month from age 25 to 65, a normal working lifetime, in the average mutual fund averaging 12 percent (the seventy-year stock market average), you would have $5,458,854.45 at age sixty-five. Hope you like the car!” -D. Ramsey
Do you think I hadn't heard of compound interest before? Did I just guess at the $325k amount? If I cared, I'd be insulted.

People really shouldn't be spending any money on anything. Even just spending $2/meal a day will cost $47,576.70 of lost earnings. And that is just from the first year's worth of eating!! And what if they spent more than $2 on a meal here or there? Oh my! And that's assuming 8% return. If it was higher, you'd be losing even more! And why? Because you have to EAT every day!?!?!?!?

I really don't understand people. If you'd just stop spending now, in 40 years you'd have a vast fortune that you'd never be able to bring yourself to spend and enjoy. C'mon!!!
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 03:02 AM
  #35  
MUShadd's Avatar
MUShadd
6th Gear
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 1
From: Destin, FL
I believe the mistake almost everyone makes is they spend money based on how much they earn from working. Ideally, you want to remove as much spending as possible and invest. You invest to the point to where your investments generate an income greater than your expenses. Sounds like simple economical logic, but very few people stick to this. If you penny pinch early on, and invest all your money responsibly you will be able to live off the income from your investments alone, thus your salary will be extra cash.(to hopefully invest further and make more interest)

So basically your employment income should not fund your expenses, your investment earnings should, and this simply does not happen enough in the US.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 07:13 AM
  #36  
reelsmith.'s Avatar
reelsmith.
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,010
Likes: 11
From: Ridgefield, CT
Originally Posted by SnYpR
So basically your employment income should not fund your expenses, your investment earnings should.
I hope I can reach that point one day.

I've never had car payments and hopefully never will. The amount of money I have on hand determines when and what I can buy. I pay cash and typically keep my cars until the wheels fall off.

Maybe its just because all the math in this thread would give me a headache and I just can't deal with it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 08:03 AM
  #37  
planeguy's Avatar
planeguy
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Kansas
Originally Posted by minicooperwill
Do you think I hadn't heard of compound interest before? Did I just guess at the $325k amount? If I cared, I'd be insulted.

People really shouldn't be spending any money on anything. Even just spending $2/meal a day will cost $47,576.70 of lost earnings. And that is just from the first year's worth of eating!! And what if they spent more than $2 on a meal here or there? Oh my! And that's assuming 8% return. If it was higher, you'd be losing even more! And why? Because you have to EAT every day!?!?!?!?

I really don't understand people. If you'd just stop spending now, in 40 years you'd have a vast fortune that you'd never be able to bring yourself to spend and enjoy. C'mon!!!
Look....There are needs and then there are wants. You spend what you need, and spend on your wants when you can afford it! I dont want to be paying for your medication when you are 70 because you mismanaged your money for the last 50 years. Alot of people destroy a large part of their wealth building capacity by buying new cars (and other items that lose value)every 3 years

Originally Posted by SnYpR
I believe the mistake almost everyone makes is they spend money based on how much they earn from working. Ideally, you want to remove as much spending as possible and invest. You invest to the point to where your investments generate an income greater than your expenses. Sounds like simple economical logic, but very few people stick to this. If you penny pinch early on, and invest all your money responsibly you will be able to live off the income from your investments alone, thus your salary will be extra cash.(to hopefully invest further and make more interest)

So basically your employment income should not fund your expenses, your investment earnings should, and this simply does not happen enough in the US.
Snypr is absolutely correct. This is the definition of affording depreciating assets. There is no reason that by your forties that your investment returns should not be more than your actual salary.

Sorry this got so far off topic....So now back to the topic that has been beat to death on at least two dozen other threads (I make funny)
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:38 AM
  #38  
Fatherdeth's Avatar
Fatherdeth
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,707
Likes: 2
From: Navarre, FL
Yeah, well I could get blown up tomorrow, so unfortunately I live for today.

Anyway, congrats on the decision Itonano. You'll definitely have fun, and like others have said, post some pictures.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #39  
itonano's Avatar
itonano
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Menorca Island, Spain
Just bought the Cooper S today and im very happy, i coudn't buy a new one because the money and because i prefer the first generation.
the car is from a very beautiful girl haha, i just tried today the car and it was my first time to drive a mini, wow how run...is almost a bargain i must say, is color british racing green, white stripes, checkered mirrors, panoramic sunroof, 17'' wheels...and for a good price doing deal, just down the price from 22.000$ to 18.000$, hehe im very good dealer and the condition is excelent, model from 2004, last check in november with 4 new wheels, no inspection until 2010, im very happy with it and i think the price is fine with 60.000km and those extras, now is at the BMW because i want some new accesories and i will post the picture as soon ii get it
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 04:33 PM
  #40  
Crashton's Avatar
Crashton
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 3
From: Over there on MA
Congratulations on your Cooper S purchase. Enjoy the ride.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 04:57 PM
  #41  
itonano's Avatar
itonano
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Menorca Island, Spain
thanks crashton, now more accesories on the car, will see what else i can buy
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Toolman
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
8
Jan 20, 2016 06:50 AM
mdutton11
R52 :: Cabrio Talk (2005-2008)
14
Oct 26, 2015 01:47 PM
skippermini
1st Gear
6
Aug 12, 2015 10:05 PM
joelcseymour
MINIs & Minis for Sale
1
Aug 7, 2015 12:43 PM
PelicanParts.com
Vendor Announcements
0
Aug 4, 2015 02:45 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:38 AM.