R50/53 Buy a Cooper S from 2003 or a Cooper from 2005?
That one way to look at it.......Buy every time I buy something I concider the true cost....The future value of the purchase and how it diminishes capacity to build wealth. That $3,000 if saved and invested for an 8% return, over the next 40 years is $65,000! Now, we can put that true cost into your formula and see that an extra $65 every drive is a bit much. Fortunately, I believe in driving a brand new car for at least 10years so I will have plenty of years and drives to disperse the added expense
I love my MINI, but to do over, I would probably get a MC instead of the MCS
I love my MINI, but to do over, I would probably get a MC instead of the MCS
....and if we are talking "true cost" we need to figure in how much money he is going to spend on gas, insurance, maintenance, car washes, time not spent finding investments where he'll get 8% a year for the next 40 years,... if he doesn't buy a car at all, look at what he'll save!
hi everyone, thanks so much for your reply, i will go finally for the MCS, because cost the same as it comes with all the extra, so i don't have to spend allot of money on them, and the non s coste the same with no extras, so that's my decision
Congrats! Be sure to post pictures!

Once gas price went through the roof I kinda wished I had a Cooper. But I'm still happy with that sweet sweet power.
i see everyone has their own little 2 cents added to this topic.
the s and non-s are essentially the same car. just a few differences.
s: more power (hp/tq) but [generally] less mpg simply cuz since people know they have the power they tend to stomp on the gas pedal more lol.
non-s: less power (hp/tq) but [generally] more mpg. people who have a non-s (like me lol) is eventually gonna stomp the pedal but only outta curiosity, thus most of the time they dont since they know its not gonna be as fast as an s.
another diff i s the engine. duh. bigger engine = more gas consumption.
hope that helps!
the s and non-s are essentially the same car. just a few differences.
s: more power (hp/tq) but [generally] less mpg simply cuz since people know they have the power they tend to stomp on the gas pedal more lol.
non-s: less power (hp/tq) but [generally] more mpg. people who have a non-s (like me lol) is eventually gonna stomp the pedal but only outta curiosity, thus most of the time they dont since they know its not gonna be as fast as an s.
another diff i s the engine. duh. bigger engine = more gas consumption.
hope that helps!
Also, even if you stomp the Cooper, you're gas mileage will still be more than if you stomp an S. You just won't go as fast.
I know my math was fuzzy, but your math needs a whole new term!! I was sticking with apples, but you're taking apples and multiplying them by bananas and dividing by oranges to come up with some crazy fruit-salad number logic. If he didn't buy a car at all and invested for 40 years he could have over $325,000. Using your math in "my formula" means it'd cost him $325 a day. Seems like there is something wrong when we do math your way, huh? 

P = C (1 + r/n) nt
whereP = future value
C = initial deposit
r = interest rate (expressed as a fraction: eg. 0.06)
n = # of times per year interest in compounded
t = number of years invested
“Taking on a car payment is one of the dumbest things people do to destroy their chances of building wealth. The car payment is most folks’ largest payment except for their home mortgage, so it steals more money from the income than virtually anything else. USA Today notes that the average car payment is $464 over sixty-four months. Most people get a car payment and keep it throughout their lives. As soon as a car is paid off, they get another payment because they “need” a new car. If you keep a $464 car payment throughout your life, which is “normal,” you miss the opportunity to save that money. If you invested $464 per month from age 25 to 65, a normal working lifetime, in the average mutual fund averaging 12 percent (the seventy-year stock market average), you would have $5,458,854.45 at age sixty-five. Hope you like the car!” -D. Ramsey
No....Its a very common calculation when making buisness decisions. and yes, making carpayments your whole life does cost about $325 a day.....Its actually about $376 a day. Anyway ....its called compund interest.
P = future value
C = initial deposit
r = interest rate (expressed as a fraction: eg. 0.06)
n = # of times per year interest in compounded
t = number of years invested
“Taking on a car payment is one of the dumbest things people do to destroy their chances of building wealth. The car payment is most folks’ largest payment except for their home mortgage, so it steals more money from the income than virtually anything else. USA Today notes that the average car payment is $464 over sixty-four months. Most people get a car payment and keep it throughout their lives. As soon as a car is paid off, they get another payment because they “need” a new car. If you keep a $464 car payment throughout your life, which is “normal,” you miss the opportunity to save that money. If you invested $464 per month from age 25 to 65, a normal working lifetime, in the average mutual fund averaging 12 percent (the seventy-year stock market average), you would have $5,458,854.45 at age sixty-five. Hope you like the car!” -D. Ramsey
P = C (1 + r/n) nt
whereP = future value
C = initial deposit
r = interest rate (expressed as a fraction: eg. 0.06)
n = # of times per year interest in compounded
t = number of years invested
“Taking on a car payment is one of the dumbest things people do to destroy their chances of building wealth. The car payment is most folks’ largest payment except for their home mortgage, so it steals more money from the income than virtually anything else. USA Today notes that the average car payment is $464 over sixty-four months. Most people get a car payment and keep it throughout their lives. As soon as a car is paid off, they get another payment because they “need” a new car. If you keep a $464 car payment throughout your life, which is “normal,” you miss the opportunity to save that money. If you invested $464 per month from age 25 to 65, a normal working lifetime, in the average mutual fund averaging 12 percent (the seventy-year stock market average), you would have $5,458,854.45 at age sixty-five. Hope you like the car!” -D. Ramsey

People really shouldn't be spending any money on anything. Even just spending $2/meal a day will cost $47,576.70 of lost earnings. And that is just from the first year's worth of eating!! And what if they spent more than $2 on a meal here or there? Oh my! And that's assuming 8% return. If it was higher, you'd be losing even more! And why? Because you have to EAT every day!?!?!?!?
I really don't understand people. If you'd just stop spending now, in 40 years you'd have a vast fortune that you'd never be able to bring yourself to spend and enjoy. C'mon!!!
I believe the mistake almost everyone makes is they spend money based on how much they earn from working. Ideally, you want to remove as much spending as possible and invest. You invest to the point to where your investments generate an income greater than your expenses. Sounds like simple economical logic, but very few people stick to this. If you penny pinch early on, and invest all your money responsibly you will be able to live off the income from your investments alone, thus your salary will be extra cash.(to hopefully invest further and make more interest)
So basically your employment income should not fund your expenses, your investment earnings should, and this simply does not happen enough in the US.
So basically your employment income should not fund your expenses, your investment earnings should, and this simply does not happen enough in the US.
I've never had car payments and hopefully never will. The amount of money I have on hand determines when and what I can buy. I pay cash and typically keep my cars until the wheels fall off.
Maybe its just because all the math in this thread would give me a headache and I just can't deal with it.
Do you think I hadn't heard of compound interest before? Did I just guess at the $325k amount? If I cared, I'd be insulted.
People really shouldn't be spending any money on anything. Even just spending $2/meal a day will cost $47,576.70 of lost earnings. And that is just from the first year's worth of eating!! And what if they spent more than $2 on a meal here or there? Oh my! And that's assuming 8% return. If it was higher, you'd be losing even more! And why? Because you have to EAT every day!?!?!?!?
I really don't understand people. If you'd just stop spending now, in 40 years you'd have a vast fortune that you'd never be able to bring yourself to spend and enjoy. C'mon!!!
People really shouldn't be spending any money on anything. Even just spending $2/meal a day will cost $47,576.70 of lost earnings. And that is just from the first year's worth of eating!! And what if they spent more than $2 on a meal here or there? Oh my! And that's assuming 8% return. If it was higher, you'd be losing even more! And why? Because you have to EAT every day!?!?!?!?
I really don't understand people. If you'd just stop spending now, in 40 years you'd have a vast fortune that you'd never be able to bring yourself to spend and enjoy. C'mon!!!

I believe the mistake almost everyone makes is they spend money based on how much they earn from working. Ideally, you want to remove as much spending as possible and invest. You invest to the point to where your investments generate an income greater than your expenses. Sounds like simple economical logic, but very few people stick to this. If you penny pinch early on, and invest all your money responsibly you will be able to live off the income from your investments alone, thus your salary will be extra cash.(to hopefully invest further and make more interest)
So basically your employment income should not fund your expenses, your investment earnings should, and this simply does not happen enough in the US.
So basically your employment income should not fund your expenses, your investment earnings should, and this simply does not happen enough in the US.
Sorry this got so far off topic....So now back to the topic that has been beat to death on at least two dozen other threads (I make funny)
Just bought the Cooper S today
and im very happy, i coudn't buy a new one because the money and because i prefer the first generation.
the car is from a very beautiful girl haha, i just tried today the car and it was my first time to drive a mini, wow how run...is almost a bargain i must say, is color british racing green, white stripes, checkered mirrors, panoramic sunroof, 17'' wheels...and for a good price doing deal, just down the price from 22.000$ to 18.000$, hehe im very good dealer and the condition is excelent, model from 2004, last check in november with 4 new wheels, no inspection until 2010, im very happy with it and i think the price is fine with 60.000km and those extras, now is at the BMW because i want some new accesories and i will post the picture as soon ii get it
and im very happy, i coudn't buy a new one because the money and because i prefer the first generation.the car is from a very beautiful girl haha, i just tried today the car and it was my first time to drive a mini, wow how run...is almost a bargain i must say, is color british racing green, white stripes, checkered mirrors, panoramic sunroof, 17'' wheels...and for a good price doing deal, just down the price from 22.000$ to 18.000$, hehe im very good dealer and the condition is excelent, model from 2004, last check in november with 4 new wheels, no inspection until 2010, im very happy with it and i think the price is fine with 60.000km and those extras, now is at the BMW because i want some new accesories and i will post the picture as soon ii get it
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
R50/53 Guidance on selling a 2005 S
Toolman
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
8
Jan 20, 2016 06:50 AM
PelicanParts.com
Vendor Announcements
0
Aug 4, 2015 02:45 PM




