R50/53 Which Spark Plugs?
The fix is the tricky part. See if you can get a good look at the threading for that plug. If just a portion of the first thread is damaged you might be able to actually use the plug to catch the undamaged thread and have the plug itself clean up the damaged area as it screws in. Or you could get a tap and use it to recut the threading into the undamaged section. The risk in either of these is cross threading and cutting/"repairing" the damaged thread and having that not match the undamaged part.
If it were me I'd get a tap, which is tapered, insert it into the hole deep enough to begin engaging the undamaged threading (you'd have to hold it at a slight angle after you inserted it partly to catch the tap in the undamaged plug hole threading) and gently twist the tap deeper using the undamaged thread as the guide until the tap cut/repaired the upper damaged section.
It's not for the faint of heart and it wouldn't be easy due to the recess of the plug home; taking off the valve cover might help a lot.
Or you could pull the cylinder head and repair it with a tap from below. Or take it to a dealer and let them do it.
Sorry for your troubles, and I hope some of this helps.
Last edited by ridingfar; Jan 30, 2008 at 02:43 PM.
Just remember to vacuum out your cylinder after you do your tapping!
I tourque the plugs up to 22 ft-lbs as you have to use a long extension. Just don't tourque up to 40 because then you may have to do some machine work.
Jeremy
I tourque the plugs up to 22 ft-lbs as you have to use a long extension. Just don't tourque up to 40 because then you may have to do some machine work.
Jeremy
Excellent idea….consider this though, worn electrodes equates to a wider gap beyond specification. Wider gap requires more energy from the coil, which the coil can handle up to a point…..I would be more concerned about the pressure in the combustion chamber extinguishing the spark prematurely resulting in self induced misfire, resulting in high oxygen readings at the O2 sensor (false lean)….The ECU responds by commanding more fuel….resulting in non homogenous mixture which will poison the catalytic converter. In the end there is no such thing as a free lunch.
I have no stored codes now. Yippee!
Jeremy
I can certainly understand the concerns folks are having regarding the spark plugs.....keep in mind that the original plugs were designed for the application are intended to be a long term consumable (i.e 100k miles).
Regarding any recommendation I would make, is to use an ignition lab scope to determine the condition of the plugs and the entire combustion process, this is a non intrusive test and provides concrete data upon which to make a decision!
When the voltages go out side of the specification, inefficiencies start to creep in.
I do not recommend the use of any additives on the plug threads, nor do I recommend the casual and unnecessary removal of the plugs and wires.
The heads are aluminum and the threads certainly will not withstand too many cycles of plug replacement. Using anti seize compounds on the threads can insulate the proper grounding of the plugs and induce a weak spark......likewise damaged threads do not provide a proper ground (on a waste spark system the spark energy travel through the head then over to the companion plug). The proper way to repair the damaged threads is to use the repair kit designated for that purposes and install a heli coil.
To summarize: let the lab scope data dictate when to replace, always torque to proper specs. IMHO.
Regarding any recommendation I would make, is to use an ignition lab scope to determine the condition of the plugs and the entire combustion process, this is a non intrusive test and provides concrete data upon which to make a decision!
When the voltages go out side of the specification, inefficiencies start to creep in.
I do not recommend the use of any additives on the plug threads, nor do I recommend the casual and unnecessary removal of the plugs and wires.
The heads are aluminum and the threads certainly will not withstand too many cycles of plug replacement. Using anti seize compounds on the threads can insulate the proper grounding of the plugs and induce a weak spark......likewise damaged threads do not provide a proper ground (on a waste spark system the spark energy travel through the head then over to the companion plug). The proper way to repair the damaged threads is to use the repair kit designated for that purposes and install a heli coil.
To summarize: let the lab scope data dictate when to replace, always torque to proper specs. IMHO.
Last edited by frenchie; Jan 30, 2008 at 05:12 PM.
Most anti seize compounds are very conductive, containing aluminum
and or copper in them. I think you risk more thread deterioration over time by
not using one on the plug threads.
and or copper in them. I think you risk more thread deterioration over time by
not using one on the plug threads.
A number of automotive applications are out there and range in price from about $1500 and up. Some of these scopes are laptop based. Some vendors are OTC, Snap-On, MAC, Fluke, Pico Scope, ATS. Interro PDA, and a number of others. I think the dealer as well as some local repair shops have these tools and hopefully may charge a minimum fee to hook up and provide a hardcopy print out; one at idle and a snap throttle.
Has anyone tried using the "Back Tap"?
http://www.back-tap.com/
Jim
(who always uses a dab of anti-sieze and torques to 22 ft/lbs, and never has had any spark plug issues)
http://www.back-tap.com/
Jim
(who always uses a dab of anti-sieze and torques to 22 ft/lbs, and never has had any spark plug issues)
Confused
I had found this article and the comments on MF useful
For me the thread on MF was a bit confusing. I've decided after my Denso plug incident to go back to stock. The MF thread makes mention that if you have the SC reduction pulley (which I have), then you "should" use a plug that's colder to prevent detonation.
So, does stock plug + 15% pulley = bad ?
I saw the MF article, and my only takeaway was that you can use either, and the JCW replacement interval depends on what the meaning of 'service interval' is.
Blue Brummie, I don't think the stock plugs are 'bad' with a 15%, but from my understanding, the colder plug will be 'better' as it helps reduce detonation.
My suspicion is that 'iridium' is simply a marketing follow-on to platinum.
I'll probably go with the multiprong, as I loathe marketing.
The only real advantage I see with the multiprong is the reduced electrode wear due to the reverse firing cylinders.
I haven't seen any particulars on the iridium other than it's the latest greatest thing.
Blue Brummie, I don't think the stock plugs are 'bad' with a 15%, but from my understanding, the colder plug will be 'better' as it helps reduce detonation.
My suspicion is that 'iridium' is simply a marketing follow-on to platinum.
I'll probably go with the multiprong, as I loathe marketing.

The only real advantage I see with the multiprong is the reduced electrode wear due to the reverse firing cylinders.
I haven't seen any particulars on the iridium other than it's the latest greatest thing.
A number of automotive applications are out there and range in price from about $1500 and up. Some of these scopes are laptop based. Some vendors are OTC, Snap-On, MAC, Fluke, Pico Scope, ATS. Interro PDA, and a number of others. I think the dealer as well as some local repair shops have these tools and hopefully may charge a minimum fee to hook up and provide a hardcopy print out; one at idle and a snap throttle.
Is there no handheld scope in the $200-$500 range?
Could these oscilloscopes work for automotive ignition voltage outputs?
http://www.mbelectronics.com/view.aspx?id=328
Jeremy
You don't need anything more than stock plugs/coilpack/wires, with stock gap. Its not a 400WHP car, dont spend more than $5 per plug. Also make them hand tight and then another 1/4 - 1/8 turn. No need to torque them, even though its 22 ft/lbs, we dont wan't to strip a cylendar head.
Real quick lesson on "cold plugs vs hot plugs"
Cold plugs have a longer electrode, which absorbs more heat energy than a "hot plug" which adversely absorbs less heat energy. Back in the stone age (1970's), Cold plugs would be fitted on a car that saw long distance drives, and warm plugs were used on your grandmothers car that saw short 3 minute trips to the grocery store. With todays technology, that sort of spark plug servicing is not as important to the ignition system operation as it used to be. Cold plugs vs stock is a marketing scheme in the same way as changing your oil every 3,000 miles. Bottom line is its not my decision, but its good to know what a cold plug is before investing $ over stock.
Cold plugs have a longer electrode, which absorbs more heat energy than a "hot plug" which adversely absorbs less heat energy. Back in the stone age (1970's), Cold plugs would be fitted on a car that saw long distance drives, and warm plugs were used on your grandmothers car that saw short 3 minute trips to the grocery store. With todays technology, that sort of spark plug servicing is not as important to the ignition system operation as it used to be. Cold plugs vs stock is a marketing scheme in the same way as changing your oil every 3,000 miles. Bottom line is its not my decision, but its good to know what a cold plug is before investing $ over stock.
Last edited by second to none; Feb 2, 2008 at 04:02 PM. Reason: .
You don't need anything more than stock plugs/coilpack/wires, with stock gap. Its not a 400WHP car, dont spend more than $5 per plug. Also make them hand tight and then another 1/4 - 1/8 turn. No need to torque them, even though its 22 ft/lbs, we dont wan't to strip a cylendar head.
I've looked at those suppliers before(expensive but durable/reliable).
Is there no handheld scope in the $200-$500 range?
Could these oscilloscopes work for automotive ignition voltage outputs?
http://www.mbelectronics.com/view.aspx?id=328
Jeremy
Is there no handheld scope in the $200-$500 range?
Could these oscilloscopes work for automotive ignition voltage outputs?
http://www.mbelectronics.com/view.aspx?id=328
Jeremy
So these handheld scopes-with the inductive probes(only up to 600V)-couldn't handle automotive ignitions? Too bad because it would have been a neat little option to check variation in spark from cylinder to cylinder and variation over the life of each type of plug.
Jeremy
Jeremy
Autozone. That was an exaggerated figure, I think I bought Bosch plugs last winter at about $6 per plug. 
They're not the NGK plugs that come factory, but they are of equal quality.

They're not the NGK plugs that come factory, but they are of equal quality.
Last edited by second to none; Feb 3, 2008 at 08:39 AM. Reason: :)
I've looked at those suppliers before(expensive but durable/reliable).
Is there no handheld scope in the $200-$500 range?
Could these oscilloscopes work for automotive ignition voltage outputs?
http://www.mbelectronics.com/view.aspx?id=328
Jeremy
Is there no handheld scope in the $200-$500 range?
Could these oscilloscopes work for automotive ignition voltage outputs?
http://www.mbelectronics.com/view.aspx?id=328
Jeremy
I've looked at those suppliers before(expensive but durable/reliable).
Is there no handheld scope in the $200-$500 range?
Could these oscilloscopes work for automotive ignition voltage outputs?
http://www.mbelectronics.com/view.aspx?id=328
Jeremy
Is there no handheld scope in the $200-$500 range?
Could these oscilloscopes work for automotive ignition voltage outputs?
http://www.mbelectronics.com/view.aspx?id=328
Jeremy
I have the APS230 scope, and while it works, it was difficult to use for the ignition because the signal jumps aaround quite a bit. I beleive this is due to the unit being a general purpose scope. On the scopes designed for automotive you will get a more stable display because the unit actually takes several readings then displays an average of the signal, this way the signal looks more stable and can be read compared to a unit that lacks the ability to average and displays a live signal. this is why for example the MODIS and other such devices produce such a stable signal. hope this helps.





