Tires, Wheels, & Brakes Discussion about wheels, tires, and brakes for the new MINI.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

2010 MCS, 16" stock wheels non-RF cornering?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2017 | 10:49 AM
  #1  
Ketchup's Avatar
Ketchup
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 81
Likes: 2
From: Riverside, CA
2010 MCS, 16" stock wheels non-RF cornering?

Hi all.
I have a 2010 MCS that has the stock 16" wheels. No money to change them out just yet...but I am almost in need of replacement tires.

Did some research on here, but couldn't correlate the info I needed.

I have the run-flats on now and if I switch to non-run flats, will the cornering suffer since the sidewalls in those RF tires are pretty stiff?

If I go with a slightly lower profile tire (can I?) how far off with the speedo be and would mileage change a bunch?

I commute 80 miles/day all high-speed freeway unless there's traffic.

Thanks for the info.
 
Attached Thumbnails 2010 MCS, 16" stock wheels non-RF cornering?-pepper.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2017 | 07:30 AM
  #2  
gjxj's Avatar
gjxj
4th Gear
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 344
Likes: 9
205-50-16 is 1.6% smaller than 195-55-16 (~1mph@60). Given how far off the speedo is to begin with, who cares?

I'd suggest you do a search, the topic has been discussed to death .. probably why you got no other responses.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2017 | 04:14 PM
  #3  
Ketchup's Avatar
Ketchup
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 81
Likes: 2
From: Riverside, CA
Thanks for the reply....I didn't see anything about non-run flats and handling.
I'll keep looking.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2017 | 05:04 PM
  #4  
squawSkiBum's Avatar
squawSkiBum
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 341
From: San Francisco Bay Area
RF vs. non-RF has been debated endlessly here: https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...and-brakes-36/

You'll also find a lot of recommendations for tires of both types.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2017 | 07:13 PM
  #5  
-=gRaY rAvEn=-'s Avatar
-=gRaY rAvEn=-
Moderator
iTrader: (43)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 70
From: Cape of Cod
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...calculator.php

Use the above link to determine the tire / speedo quandary.

Moved thread.
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2017 | 09:30 PM
  #6  
Ketchup's Avatar
Ketchup
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 81
Likes: 2
From: Riverside, CA
Thanks :-)
 
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2017 | 12:53 PM
  #7  
contented's Avatar
contented
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 80
Likes: 8
From: Sunshine State
I was recently in the exact situation as you on my F57 convertible and its stock 16" runflat pirellis. After considerable study, I bought Michelin Pilot Sport A/S+ in the stock size, i.e. 195/55/16. Although I wanted a high performance summer tire, selection is limited in 16" so I settled on the above. All I can say is the difference is amazing. It's like driving a different car. I can't notice any difference in noise, ride is ever so slightly firmer, but the handling improvement is amazing.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 03:24 PM
  #8  
mbwicz's Avatar
mbwicz
6th Gear
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 53
From: Buffalo area, NY
I would expect that the turn-in would be a little less sharp with the regular tires. Ride will be better, especially over little ripples. The ride over significant bumps won't change too much, the car is still stiff.

Handling change is hard to quantify. Transient response may be less crisp, but cornering may be significantly better, depending on the tires you pick. Summer performance tires should give you strong handling with minimal reduction in sharpness compared to runflats. The tread compound and tire construction should perform better than the runflats, even though the sidewall won't be as stiff.

Have fun,
Mike
 
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2017 | 08:38 AM
  #9  
Ketchup's Avatar
Ketchup
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 81
Likes: 2
From: Riverside, CA
Thanks a bunch for the info!!
 
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:39 PM.