How To Drivetrain :: Operation Vacuum Gain System (VGS)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2005 | 01:57 PM
  #101  
SumWon's Avatar
SumWon
5th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by DunWaiten
andy@ross-tech said
It seems that a failure of the bypass valve diaphragm and/or housing would open a path from the intake manifold to atmosphere through the vacuum line installed as part of the VGS setup. I think that would act like a vacuum leak under low boost conditions, and would cause idling problems. Of course, the stock setup could also fail, causing idling problems.
My concern with a failure would be the fact that we are taking the vac from the fuel regulator. What are the results of the fuel regulator loosing the correct vac?
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2005 | 03:06 PM
  #102  
Itsdchz's Avatar
Itsdchz
5th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
From: Central Valley, CA
I just want to verify:

Either stock setup or the VGS mod incorporate potential problems, so which is really the best way to run? All I know is 200 miles later I am happy with the new setup, and I am sure Andy must be at a few thousand, and no complaints.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2005 | 05:57 PM
  #103  
xsmini's Avatar
xsmini
6th Gear
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 28
From: Bishop, Ca
I have alittle over 1200 miles with the VGS, and am completly happy. I've actually gained 1 mpg . Some interesting points have been brought up, but no one has had any negative experiences yet. (I know its still early) I'll keep you posted if anything does come up with mine.

Nik
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 10:53 AM
  #104  
JPit's Avatar
JPit
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
I currently have my MINI disassembled to complete the VGS and I hope one of the experts is on line. Here are my current questions: 1) the vacuum line connecting the diaphram and the bypass valve appears to be 5/32". I pulled off the end at the bypass valve and sealed it off. I connected a long section of 5/32" hose to the bypass valve and this is where I am now. The hose that connects the nipple on the intake manifold to the FPR is a much smaller diameter. Can you tell me what size this is? Would it be OK to cut into this hose closer to the FPR than at the intake nipple? Thanks for your help.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 10:59 AM
  #105  
Cooper S IRE's Avatar
Cooper S IRE
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JPit
I currently have my MINI disassembled to complete the VGS and I hope one of the experts is on line. Here are my current questions: 1) the vacuum line connecting the diaphram and the bypass valve appears to be 5/32". I pulled off the end at the bypass valve and sealed it off. I connected a long section of 5/32" hose to the bypass valve and this is where I am now. The hose that connects the nipple on the intake manifold to the FPR is a much smaller diameter. Can you tell me what size this is? Would it be OK to cut into this hose closer to the FPR than at the intake nipple? Thanks for your help.
no dont cut the hose to the FPR
you put your T piece on the end of the FPR hose (the grey rubber piece)
you connect one of the other ends of the T to the long hose connected to the bypass
put a small piece of vaccum hose on the manifold nipple where the FPR hose came from and pipe this to the last place on the T piece
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 11:07 AM
  #106  
JPit's Avatar
JPit
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Please correct me if I am wrong but the vacuum hose connecting the manifold nipple to the FPS is very small. Do you know the diameter?
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 11:11 AM
  #107  
andy@ross-tech.com's Avatar
andy@ross-tech.com
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 6
From: Lansdale, PA
The vacuum hose from the FPR to the manifold is very small but it has rubber boots on each end that fit on 5/32" hose barbs. You can replace that hose altogether with 5/32" ID vacuum line if you want.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 11:14 AM
  #108  
JPit's Avatar
JPit
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
I understand what you are saying. Last question (before the next one): Is the gray housing on the hose part of the vacuum line and does this whole thing gets disconnected from the nipple? Thanks again.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 11:19 AM
  #109  
andy@ross-tech.com's Avatar
andy@ross-tech.com
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 6
From: Lansdale, PA
Yes, the rubber boot on the tiny hard plastic stock vacuum line is part of the line. Do not remove that rubber boot from the tiny hard plastic stock vacuum line.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #110  
JPit's Avatar
JPit
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Thanks, Andy. One last question. If I replace the entire line, can I put the T near the FPS or will this cause a problem? Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #111  
andy@ross-tech.com's Avatar
andy@ross-tech.com
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 6
From: Lansdale, PA
As long as you don't have any leaks, it shouldn't matter where the tees are located. The volume of air inside the 5/32" ID vacuum lines is extremely small.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 03:18 PM
  #112  
JPit's Avatar
JPit
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Thanks everyone for their help. Took a couple of hours to do it right. I don't see how you could do it without taking off the IC and Itsdchz is right - long needle nose pliers are a must. I used 9" needle nose vise grips and they worked OK.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 06:40 PM
  #113  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 4
From: Woodside, CA
Stock vs Ryephix II vs VGS

I've had teh VGS on for about two weeks now. Here's what it seems like.

1) Stock sucks. And you have to ajust the butterfly stop at least, so why leave it stock?

2) Ryphix II is definantly the most aggressive. It switches like a hammer, and makes very light throttle driving a bit of a pain in the butt, but it sure put the power down early! I'd go this way if I were a track rat.

3) VGS gives back a lot of the arount town light throttle drivability back. Gas milage improved 1-2 mpg as well when compared to Ryephix II for sure. Since I only do 2-3 Mini track events a year, I'm gonna stay with the VGS.

Also, for more drammatic effect, you can stretch the stock spring a bit. This will increase the force that the diaphram will have to act agains (close earlier as vacuum decreases) and the spring constant will increase as well, making it open slower as vacuum increases (close slower as well, but as the manifold pressure will increase as it closes, the rate that it closes should increase via posative feedback). By stretching the spring different ammounts, one ought to get any behaviour you really want.

The RPII is a little different, less turns of thicker wire (much higher spring constant), but you get the idea.... I stretched mine about 1/4-3/8 of an inch.... Just guessed.

Matt
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 01:32 AM
  #114  
Cooper S IRE's Avatar
Cooper S IRE
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
all credit to Andy for this and that he shared it with everyone well done and thanks Andy
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 02:36 PM
  #115  
MR.MINI's Avatar
MR.MINI
1st Gear
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Crystal Lake, IL
Works just great.

Thanks, Andy
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 12:21 PM
  #116  
andy@ross-tech.com's Avatar
andy@ross-tech.com
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 6
From: Lansdale, PA
Glad it works for ya.
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2005 | 09:03 PM
  #117  
Originalhotrodder's Avatar
Originalhotrodder
1st Gear
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Andy,
Thank you so much for giving us this great mod.

I have a 2005 MCS, with v39.2, and approximately 6200 miles.
I have driven many stick cars in my life but this MCS was like no other.

From the day I picked it up new, no matter what throttle/clutch technique I used, I could not get a consistent, smooth start unless I brought the rpm to 2000 or so before releasing the clutch. Also, unless I up-shifted at 3500 rpm and > the clutch engagement was never as smooth as I am used to. Another thing I noticed with this car is that the throttle response has always been delayed (as when blipping the throttle from idle). I began to theorize that the throttle hesitation was due to the drive by wire throttle and that there was nothing that could be done about it.
Since reading of your VGS mod I've wanted to install it.

Today I started at 5:10 PM and was wrapped up and putting my tools away by 6:10 PM.
I drove to our local pizza place to pick up dinner and I was amazed and very pleased at the new throttle response. Now the car has butter smooth clutch engagements and solid, smooth low rpm power and up-shifting is smoothed out as any normal car should be.
I highly suggest this mod to all MCS owners. It’s excellent and really easy to incorporate.
Thank you again for sharing your knowledge with us Andy.
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2005 | 11:42 AM
  #118  
ScottinBend's Avatar
ScottinBend
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 2
From: Oregon, USA
So Andy..........when are you going to start doing your VGS party's?


LOL

Thanks for work you do !
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #119  
rajron's Avatar
rajron
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: PHX area
So far I have put about 75 miles with the mod, most of it has been in and around the city, a lot of shifting, and boy what a difference, it is much crisper and smoother going through the gears, drivability has improved significantly.
This may be premature but my initial reactions to the VGS modifications are very positive. Throttle response has changed I had to adjust my driving style to accommodate the change. After nearly 14,000 miles of either Yo-Yo or sluggish starts (V39 helped a lot with the Yo-Yo) I found myself having to adjust to the now liner acceleration, that was never there before.
This morning I decided to do the modification, I studied the photos and diagrams supplied on this thread, purchased the necessary parts from a local store yesterday and made sure the car was cool before starting the mod. All together, including painting the IC shroud, it took about 2 hours to complete the job and cleaning up after. Like everyone before who said it was a tight fit, I agree!
The only hose that was difficult for me to identify was the hose that attached to the black plastic plunger of the bypass valve, it didn’t seem at first that the hose could be removed, but was actually very simple to remove with a little tug. Then came the most difficult part, reinstalling those hoses to the bypass valve, I never actually saw where the hose attached to the other part of the bypass valve, the one that was blanked off, I just felt it, that was a “beach” to put back in and probably took me the longest time of any single task with the mod.
Interesting thing, there was a puddle of oil on both sides of the IC laying in the groves of the rubber seals. I think they were from my Alta air filter?
Is that a problem?

Anyway

Andy: Thank you for this great little mod, and spreading the word.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2005 | 06:23 AM
  #120  
andy@ross-tech.com's Avatar
andy@ross-tech.com
Thread Starter
|
6th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 6
From: Lansdale, PA
The brass vacuum nipple on the downstream side of the BPV is definitely the hardest part to get to. For easiest VGS installation, I'd recommend the following procedure:

1) Disconnect the short rubber vacuum hose from the diaphragm of the bypass valve, but leave it attached to the lower brass vacuum nipple. Cap off the now-loose end of that hose.

2) Disconnect the (hard plastic with rubber caps on each end) vacuum line from the intake manifold but leave it attached to the fuel pressure regulator.

3) Install a tee in the now-loose end of that vacuum line.

4) Install a short length of vacuum hose between the tee and the nipple on the intake manifold.

5) Intall a long piece of vacuum hose between the remaining branch on the tee and the diaphragm of the bypass valve.

6) Make sure everything is snug and that all your tools are accounted for.

7) Enjoy.

Using the above method, it should be possible (in fact it's definitely possible) to install the VGS without removing the intercooler.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2005 | 08:09 AM
  #121  
SumWon's Avatar
SumWon
5th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Are most people running the new vacuum hose from the intake manifold on top of the intake runners or under them to get to the bypass valve?
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2005 | 10:26 AM
  #122  
Originalhotrodder's Avatar
Originalhotrodder
1st Gear
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
On Top

I placed mine on top of the intake runners.

 
Attached Thumbnails Drivetrain :: Operation Vacuum Gain System (VGS)-vacuum-line-routing.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 08:39 AM
  #123  
erik99's Avatar
erik99
3rd Gear
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Any more updates/impressions on this mod? I thought it was me ham fisting the car at low speeds, but it seems the BPV is to blame.

Anyone throw a CEL with this mod?
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 08:43 AM
  #124  
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 4
From: Woodside, CA
No codes here....

Originally Posted by erik99
Any more updates/impressions on this mod? I thought it was me ham fisting the car at low speeds, but it seems the BPV is to blame.

Anyone throw a CEL with this mod?
And my BPV sucked too.

Matt
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2005 | 08:47 AM
  #125  
MartyR's Avatar
MartyR
5th Gear
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
I took out my BPV after I set-up the VGS, and it the stop screw needed adjustment, as well as the butterfly plate. With those three mods (stop screw, butterfly, and VGS), the car is considerably faster, both in terms of throttle response AND boost. I should have used a boost gauge to measure the delta before BPV adjustment and after, but alas I'm too poor and also stupid.


Marty
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:18 PM.