General MINI Talk Shared experiences, motoring minutes, and other general MINI-related discussion that applies to all MINIs, regardless of model, year or trim.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The All New MINI World Premiere - 18 Nov 2013

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 12:10 PM
  #51  
kyoo's Avatar
kyoo
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,631
Likes: 72
Originally Posted by mtbscott
As a previous owner of an R53S, an R56S, and two R56 JCW's, I approve. The car is 3.8" longer, not 4.5" as noted in the linked story. It weighs roughly 60lbs more than the R56 which was 60lbs lighter than the R53 so it's back to its original girth. Pricing is rumored to be pretty much the same as before.
Looks are subjective but I don't believe for a second that the F56 won't continue to sell at or above the same pace as the R56.
You guys here sound a lot like the 911 owners over at the Porsche forums. Every time a new generation of the 911 comes out (we're on #7 now) it's been for the most part lighter, faster, more efficient than the previous one...yet many will say that it's been ruined.....
Time stands still for no one. Many of the size and visual changes have to do with safety standards that are beyond the designer's control. The new engines are awesome, can't wait to see what they do for the JCW.

haha so true! you should see the evo 8/9 vs 10 fights on evom
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 12:59 PM
  #52  
fridayxiii's Avatar
fridayxiii
5th Gear
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 43
From: Tampa Bay, FL
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/196q...g/original.jpg


I'm sorry but the "official" pics aren't much better than the spy shots we saw earlier this year. Looking at the the R50 vs. F56, the latter car looks taller (headlights sitting higher on the body), the top of the bonnet is higher, and the front bumper....good god. Looks like the car has a friggin' mouthpiece ala American football or hockey. And the tail lights - WAY too big, and becoming more square'ish.

Then you have the interior. I'm still no fan of moving the speedo, but the design of the nav & radio: square (or rectangular peg) in a round hole gets all my NOs. And the fact that that the two middle air vents are now square while the outer air vents are still circular is kludgy.

This design does nothing for me, leaves me feeling totally "meh". The only element I like is the rear wing on the F56, but that's no where near enough to budge me from my "R53 Forever" stance.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 01:24 PM
  #53  
Tommy Kardinal's Avatar
Tommy Kardinal
2nd Gear
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 6thGear
So far, I still dont like the exterior, but will researve my final vote until I see the thing in person. Interior is OK, moving the speedo is fine, but I dont like the new position for the start button. Right now the start sequence is very smooth....insert fob and hit the start button with the finger without moving the hand......now its insert fob, then move the whole hand to the center start button.....
let me stop you right there because this:


is the coolest thing ever

let me remind you how you start an Aventador


It's all about the car making you feel special. And there is nothing more special than toggle switches. Nothing.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 03:06 PM
  #54  
tampadave's Avatar
tampadave
5th Gear
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, Virginia
The non-S looks better than the S in my honest opinion. Thank God I just purchased my '14 Roadster S so I don't have to worry about replacement for quite some time.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 03:15 PM
  #55  
Mab01uk's Avatar
Mab01uk
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 640
Likes: 1
From: London, England
Name:  Bracknell_zps437441ea.jpg
Views: 163
Size:  97.7 KB

Name:  grey-f56_zps6ee2fd7d.jpg
Views: 185
Size:  109.1 KB

BMW Group Bracknell UK Launch today.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 05:02 PM
  #56  
teamrubixcube's Avatar
teamrubixcube
4th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 450
Likes: 1
From: Northern CT
No one is surprised that they're only squeaking out 189 hp with a 2.0 turbo? Some NA 2.0L cars are making more hp than that...
Hopefully they're going for reliability this time around.
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 05:26 PM
  #57  
GoThingNC's Avatar
GoThingNC
4th Gear
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 543
Likes: 8
From: Raleigh, NC
I love it !!
Gives me one more reason to keep my R53
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 05:53 PM
  #58  
kyoo's Avatar
kyoo
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,631
Likes: 72
Originally Posted by teamrubixcube
No one is surprised that they're only squeaking out 189 hp with a 2.0 turbo? Some NA 2.0L cars are making more hp than that...
Hopefully they're going for reliability this time around.
probably limited on purpose for the jcw
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2013 | 05:57 PM
  #59  
TG.'s Avatar
TG.
6th Gear
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 56
From: Western PA
Originally Posted by Mab01uk
Wow, didn't realize it was out until I came here

I hate to admit it but overall it's probably the right move to make the MINI more popular and grow sales but I personally can't say I'm liking some of the changes over the R50s serie which retained its marginal fun attitude. This is definitely closer to the, dare I say, "sedan" perception among cars of all brands.

I think the central speedo and central window buttons had more charm for sure but it is not well perceived by most average buyers I can tell you that from all the conversations I've had with none MINI owners. Don't forget non-MINI owners are where growth is for MINI... so it is a natural evolution that shows pressure from its competitors.

It is bigger looking and that is something perhaps the most controversial imo. When is a MINI not "mini" any longer. Once again the success of the Countryman shows that small is fun but in a market where large SUVs are kings it is limiting sales growth. so once more I think it is a smart move even though I personally don't like it as much. What attracted me to the MINI was the freedom of motoring anywhere. But I am part of a very very small market segment (married, no kids) so I don't count

I am also very neutral about the LED headlights. I think it is definitely noticeable and will likely be perceived as original but I also think the industry is very close to tapping out on the coolness of light design and seriously need to come-up with something radically new AND beneficial. This is a bit too gimmicky for me, sorry to say.

I do like the Start button where it is shown. Why? well because it is one of the best use of the toggle switches imo. There as always been something cool about the "easy" start button yet it always gives a detached feel from the car to a degree over an old fashion key that lets you connect more directly with the driving experience. This is really a nice NEW way to marry both experiences in a new format. for that MINI! nice touch. True evolution.

I'm also happy they are up-scaling the materials. It is clear to me that this new MINI generation is feeling the heat of the competition. Interior, though filled with customization, is a bit lacking in terms of quality feel from the rest of the competition. We personally had to spend quite some money to get ours to feel more upscale when it should not be so for a brand that is more expensive to start with. So this is a good thing.

I don't have much to say about the technology. I'm a bit phased out from it. I use to like technology very much but I find now that it does not inspire me at all and is quite boring (for me) so I don't care all that much if that feels like an upgrade or not... just my personal taste for sure. I wouldn't buy or not the car because of it.

The front grill is definitely a mistake I think. This is where pressure from the competition is affecting brand personality too much. Time will tell if familiarity with other brand vehicles wins over odd looking shapes but you've got to scratch your head as to why all brands are doing the same awful and ugly mouth like bumper. I certainly do . . . may be I'm the only one to have a problem with that (also old) trend.

Lastly I'm a big big fan of performance engine and when I say performance I mean engines that delivers more power with less fuel. That something BMW is winning my heart over more and more. So I'm happy with the engine technology they are bringing into those new engines. Sweet! . . . if anything I wish it would have been 4 times more impressive to make the MINI indispensable to own. Give me 0to60 in less than 6 second with 60mpg and I won't buy anything else

Well those are my long 2 cents

I am very happy to have bought ours when we did from a personal taste perspective. Yet I recognize there are good things I like from this new model perhaps more from the inside than outside.

But I'd say good job to the design team none the less. It is not easy to do what they do with all the pressure coming from all kinds of angles, and trust me it is more from the inside than the outside (I'm quite biased). They already know what they will start adjusting and change to the other models coming. Good luck with the new MINI.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 08:23 AM
  #60  
tampadave's Avatar
tampadave
5th Gear
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, Virginia
TG,

You gave a very thoughtful review. I particularly appreciate your comment that MINI's target demographic are non-MINI owners versus the stereotypical MINI owner. Despite antagonism directed toward the front end, headlights, etc., I imagine many current MINI owners will ultimately return to the brand as their own MINI ages. I'm keeping my fingers crossed on the new MINI 'sports car' due out in a few years.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 08:53 AM
  #61  
mrathburn's Avatar
mrathburn
2nd Gear
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: WA State
Originally Posted by mtbscott
As a previous owner of an R53S, an R56S, and two R56 JCW's, I approve. The car is 3.8" longer, not 4.5" as noted in the linked story. It weighs roughly 60lbs more than the R56 which was 60lbs lighter than the R53 so it's back to its original girth. Pricing is rumored to be pretty much the same as before.
Looks are subjective but I don't believe for a second that the F56 won't continue to sell at or above the same pace as the R56.
You guys here sound a lot like the 911 owners over at the Porsche forums. Every time a new generation of the 911 comes out (we're on #7 now) it's been for the most part lighter, faster, more efficient than the previous one...yet many will say that it's been ruined.....
Time stands still for no one. Many of the size and visual changes have to do with safety standards that are beyond the designer's control. The new engines are awesome, can't wait to see what they do for the JCW.
This is the best comment I've ever seen on this forum (or any forum.)
+1,000,000,000
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 10:06 AM
  #62  
russmini's Avatar
russmini
4th Gear
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 457
Likes: 10
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by kyoo
probably limited on purpose for the jcw
JCW will probably get the 240 hp version of the 2.0 liter BMW engine.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 12:05 PM
  #63  
jrs66's Avatar
jrs66
3rd Gear
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Interesting that many/most appear to either hate the Bloated One or are trying to rationalize how they will someday like it. Generally speaking, when you see a new model car, aren't you supposed to say 'wow... how cool is that!'. That clearly isn't the case for this... glad I got my GP!
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 12:16 PM
  #64  
tampadave's Avatar
tampadave
5th Gear
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, Virginia
The non-S doesn't look too bad by visual comparison. Does the F56 have less bonnet curvature than the R56?

 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 03:35 PM
  #65  
Mab01uk's Avatar
Mab01uk
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 640
Likes: 1
From: London, England
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 03:57 PM
  #66  
macmanjpc's Avatar
macmanjpc
1st Gear
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
I may be in the minority, at least here, but I'm really liking the new design. When I see pics like this one I can't help but see an old, outdated, frumpy design in the R56 now. Sorry if that starts a war but I get the exact same feeling now when I look at the E90 version of the 3 Series compared to the new ones. Change is going to happen. End of story. Yes the car is bigger but as a manufacturer having to consider more than just the MINI purists to sell more cars they have to address the concerns of those buyers while at the same time retain as much heritage of the originals as possible. The number one stumbling point for potential buyers and a MINI is size. Plain and simple. If they can't fit their peeps and their stuff they'll buy something else. Quite often regrettably because they love the MINI. This car addresses those most common complaints. More people space. More luggage space. More power. More efficiency. No center speedo. No central window switches. Etc. We're getting more car. More features. More tech. More power. More comfort. More configurability. More fuel efficiency. More everything in a good way in my opinion and most people here simply want to talk about how much it's not what it was. In a way that's great! You'll be able to appreciate your current MINI for everything that this car isn't. Exactly the same thing happened when the R56 replaced the R50/53. Everybody with a MINI hated it. MINI Ruined it. Destroyed the MINI core values. Destroyed their potential to sell more MINIs. A total failure. Funny how things actually turned out though and the same will be true of this new generation.

Originally Posted by tampadave
The non-S doesn't look too bad by visual comparison. Does the F56 have less bonnet curvature than the R56?

 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 05:23 PM
  #67  
buddy lee's Avatar
buddy lee
3rd Gear
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
I'm confused, I have a 2014 convertible... Do these changes only affect the hard tops? And the rest change on the 2015 model?
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 05:25 PM
  #68  
TG.'s Avatar
TG.
6th Gear
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 56
From: Western PA
It's just business as usual. These changes will affect every model that will be progressively replaced.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 05:37 PM
  #69  
JoanieB's Avatar
JoanieB
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 1
From: San Diego County, California


(hugs her R56 and R58)

All of the MINIs that we buy from now on, will be older than our current ones, not newer.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 05:41 PM
  #70  
TG.'s Avatar
TG.
6th Gear
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 56
From: Western PA
Well, of course every models will have variance within a common theme. Like I said business as usual

Originally Posted by JoanieB
All of the MINIs that we buy from now on, will be older than our current ones, not newer.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean?


.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 06:29 PM
  #71  
JoanieB's Avatar
JoanieB
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 1
From: San Diego County, California
Originally Posted by TG.
Well, of course every models will have variance within a common theme. Like I said business as usual


I'm not sure I understand what you mean?


.
I mean that my hubby and I will look at R56s, R53s, and Classics when we decide to buy a new car. We won't look at anything with this new look.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 06:59 PM
  #72  
dwdyer's Avatar
dwdyer
5th Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 826
Likes: 2
From: Austin, TX
Any word on interior dimensions? If they lost any headroom I'm going to be quite unhappy.
 
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 07:00 PM
  #73  
raffy888's Avatar
raffy888
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 197
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, Texas
First of all I personally think BMW ruined the car, but that's just my opinion. It really comes down to personal preference whether you like the new MINI or not. I can go on forever writing about things I don't like about it. On the other hand, I researched on the "rocketman" MINI and was wondering what you guys thought about it? I think it looks nice and would definitely like to buy one in the future when it comes out...
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2013 | 12:32 PM
  #74  
gokartride's Avatar
gokartride
6th Gear
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 38,578
Likes: 2
I, too, am/was a fan of the Rocketman concept, partly because I am a fan of the philosophy behind it...keeping MINI small.

I am not particularly upset by a larger, heavier (U.S. spec) new MINI. What gets me more is BMW/MINIs long stream of official excuses and justifications for bulking up here and there over the years. It's something of a pattern and after a long stream of these I just don't buy it anymore.
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2013 | 01:30 PM
  #75  
BJM's Avatar
BJM
3rd Gear
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
I really love the new design with the exception of the front end (non-s is far better than the S IMO). I'd buy one regardless. I don't see the front end when I'm driving, and I bet this thing can corner like a beast.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:41 PM.