General MINI Talk Shared experiences, motoring minutes, and other general MINI-related discussion that applies to all MINIs, regardless of model, year or trim.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My MINI Rant

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 01:03 PM
  #26  
avuton's Avatar
avuton
3rd Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by Tommy Kardinal
So I've known all these things for a while now, but last night I was looking up 2013 Mini things from recent autoshows and whatnot and I don't like what I'm seeing. I've always felt this way but now I really feel I need to get this stuff off my chest.
Let me start off by giving you a big "Thank You", seriously, everything from your rant might has well been straight out of my mouth. The fact of the matter is that I'm so happy with my car everytime I drive I'm paranoid about it possibly being the last time I'll be able to drive it and I'd have to pick a new one .

--snip--
Originally Posted by Tommy Kardinal
I hate what they've done with the interior of the new hatches. I hate that they blacked out the steering wheel, tachometer rim or whatever I should call it and the center console. It looks awful and I hate it. It was so much more pleasing with the silver contrast. I also hate that the plastic piece between the sun visors is now black as well. There's no reason to do that! I also hate that after all these years the panoramic sunroof still isn't auto open/close. I have to hold it all through those 5 seconds or so (granted it doesn't sound like a lot but to me it's annoying) and it slowly tilts then slides back. I feel pretty indifferent about what they've done with the radio. I feel like both the design with the volume control above the CD (2nd gen) and the volume in the speedo (3rd gen) are both just awkward configurations, but I could care less. I also strongly dislike how the, for lack of better word, cover above the rear licence plate is no longer chrome unless you get the chrome package. I also am not a fan of how when you want the chrome package you have to get the chrome mirrors (according to the MINI build it website). Lastly I wish the armrest wasn't a flimsy POS, and that it came standard.
I completely relate to everything you've said here. So, what we're asking for is more options.

I've gotten a R55, R58 and R59 from the dealer as a loaner. These models were not for me, and I have no problem with MINI diluting the brand by designing them... as long as they continue making the Coop.

The 2012 R55 felt like a big black hurse with everything blacked out. The black plastic gives it a cheaper, less solid feeling. This one even had the MINI You package and it just felt and looked cheap. This is not indicitive of the Mini You package, as I've seen one that looked beautiful. The one I was loaned just had terrible contrast between black interior, blueish/white mini you leather dash.

The 2012 R58/R59 have an extremely limited rear view, which I really enjoy in my car. But again, with the black plasticky interior. So bad. Even the blacked out interiors of the headlights are very hokey looking, in my opinion.

Originally Posted by Tommy Kardinal
Another point I'd like to make it MINI's redirection toward bigger cars (Countryman and the new Paceman). It's going in the completely wrong direction. MINIs are supposed to be small and fun but it seems that they just keep getting bigger and bigger and this really concerns me for when I decide to get a new pair of keys. I understand that most consumers are looking for something bigger and MINI is trying to supply them with it, but that's ruining the MINI brand. The addition of AWD is awesome no doubt, but I don't see a need to make a larger car to do it. Imagine how cool an AWD hatch would be! (granted it would probably be a tight fit). I also just saw that the new Paceman is going to have its window switches on the door. Like c'mon! That was a almost as big of a MINI trademark as the center speedo. But since people can't live without having them on the door they went and changed it, that's just not right in my book. Have some principle. And speaking of the Paceman, what's the point? I don't see any reason to make a 2 door version of the Countryman besides to replace the Cooper hatches. What's even worse is that I've looked at the hideous Countryman design long enough that I now almost like it.
I don't have a problem with them making larger cars, but I DO wish they would focus on going smaller with the cars known for being smaller. There's plenty of space in my MC I wish I didn't have.

Originally Posted by Tommy Kardinal
MINI is supposed to be a special brand for the select few that are crazy and wild enough to handle it. I hate seeing MINIs driven by people who don't appreciate them or know what they're about. It ruins the charm of the car and the brand. I just hope that MINI can find it's way back to its roots, and soon.
+1

Originally Posted by Tommy Kardinal
(What ever happened to that awesome Rocketman?)
If it were actually ever offered, I would hate having to own a second car

Originally Posted by Tommy Kardinal
Also, I think the Coupe's roof is disgusting. /rant
I do too, but I understand there are those who love them so I keep my mouth shut about this.

The only thing that you didn't cover that I'd rant about is about the interior. I wish they'd move to a different softer material, rather than the hard plastics. Maybe same material and a thin layer of soft rubber over it. Or maybe something different altogether, something that doesn't creak and break so easily.

In my dreams, the tach and speedo would have an actual glass lens in the front as well. I mean, this car cost is a premium, would be nice to use some premium materials on the interior. At this point, I'm glad that MINI exists though. Couldn't imagine driving anything else.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 02:15 PM
  #27  
Tommy Kardinal's Avatar
Tommy Kardinal
Thread Starter
|
2nd Gear
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by avuton
The only thing that you didn't cover that I'd rant about is about the interior. I wish they'd move to a different softer material, rather than the hard plastics. Maybe same material and a thin layer of soft rubber over it. Or maybe something different altogether, something that doesn't creak and break so easily.

In my dreams, the tach and speedo would have an actual glass lens in the front as well. I mean, this car cost is a premium, would be nice to use some premium materials on the interior. At this point, I'm glad that MINI exists though. Couldn't imagine driving anything else.
I am 100% with you on this. Let's not forget that this is a BMW after all you'd think they could use the same materials that they use in their cars. Especially since, lets face it, MINIs are ~$28k cars. Sure the base hatches start at $21, but all the other cars in the line up use that same interior and start at a much higher price, a price at which you'd expect better materials. And that's just assuming you don't get a single option on it, which no one really does, so even after buying your base hatch your still looking at around $25k.

The fit and finish of the center console could be a little better as well and I completely agree with you on the gauges. I just wish that for a car of that cost whose parent makes the Ultimate Driving Machines, they would have used better materials and fitted them better.

With that said the MINI does have a good amount of soft touch materials on top of the dash and on the doors (however the area around the back seats is all plastic) and, at least on my MINI, they do a good job at not being worn out. In all I love the interior style and everything at least works, but i just wish the quality could have been bumped up to match the price of these things
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 02:52 PM
  #28  
fridayxiii's Avatar
fridayxiii
5th Gear
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 43
From: Tampa Bay, FL
^^^^^ Exactamundo
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2013 | 03:21 PM
  #29  
Deli's Avatar
Deli
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
What he said!
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 12:04 AM
  #30  
mini stig's Avatar
mini stig
1st Gear
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Drummonds, Tennessee
I've been thinking of this ever since I heard the countyman was going to have the window controls on the door. I think MINI are losing some of the personality by doing this. Their new ads say "Not Normal" but normal cars have all the same button layouts and MINI seem to be going this way. I love the CM and I hope to get one someday. I think it does fit the MINI brand because all the cars it competes against are bigger so its MINI by those standards. I can understand it's existence because as as families grow so does the need for a bit more space. The Paceman and the coupe are (in my opinion) out of place. The PM is a waste I think, with the same space as a CM but with less access to it. The coupe would be alright if it had more power, but the most powerful versions of it will rival a new Corvette on price after adding options and way above the cars they want to compete against. If they want to expand I would like to see a MINI pickup. I think one of the changes that will be made sometime will be to put LEDs or halo rings in the headlights like the current trend. I love my R50 and plan to keep it till the wheels fall off then put them back on and go again. Its the perfect car for city driving and sporty blast on the weekends.

To add a thing that has been bothering me recently is MINI pulling out of WRC. The car they had built can rival anything in the WRC but with no factory team they will not get a good driver to put it at the top. Now with VW coming in I think they will totally overshadow all the effort that MINI put in and failed to follow up on. I just really hate the thought of losing to VW.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 03:59 AM
  #31  
Deli's Avatar
Deli
6th Gear
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mini stig
The coupe would be alright if it had more power, but the most powerful versions of it will rival a new Corvette on price after adding options and way above the cars they want to compete against.
When I decided on the Coupe, I first decided I wanted another MINI; my first was an '03 MCS. Then I decided the two-seather fit my needs (kids are out of the house). And then I test drove the Coupe, the S Coupe, and the JCW. I decided the S had ample power. I never considered Corvettes, Mazdas, Audis, or other models.

Corvettes never entered the equation.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 06:15 AM
  #32  
Pure87's Avatar
Pure87
4th Gear
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Maryland, USA
Originally Posted by mini stig
I've been thinking of this ever since I heard the countyman was going to have the window controls on the door. I think MINI are losing some of the personality by doing this. Their new ads say "Not Normal" but normal cars have all the same button layouts and MINI seem to be going this way. I love the CM and I hope to get one someday. I think it does fit the MINI brand because all the cars it competes against are bigger so its MINI by those standards. I can understand it's existence because as as families grow so does the need for a bit more space. The Paceman and the coupe are (in my opinion) out of place. The PM is a waste I think, with the same space as a CM but with less access to it. The coupe would be alright if it had more power, but the most powerful versions of it will rival a new Corvette on price after adding options and way above the cars they want to compete against. If they want to expand I would like to see a MINI pickup. I think one of the changes that will be made sometime will be to put LEDs or halo rings in the headlights like the current trend. I love my R50 and plan to keep it till the wheels fall off then put them back on and go again. Its the perfect car for city driving and sporty blast on the weekends.

To add a thing that has been bothering me recently is MINI pulling out of WRC. The car they had built can rival anything in the WRC but with no factory team they will not get a good driver to put it at the top. Now with VW coming in I think they will totally overshadow all the effort that MINI put in and failed to follow up on. I just really hate the thought of losing to VW.
I agree with everything you said here except for the stuff about the Coupe. Many people in the past bought MINIs for the driving experience and even used them as weekend only cars, but had no need for the rear seats or cargo space. The Coupe and Roadster are a better fit for those types of drivers and does full a previously vacant niche.

I strongly share your opinion on the Paceman though. It's a step backwards from both the Hatch and the Countryman by combining the least convenient properties of both. The Rocketman and the rumored 5-door hatch based on the F56 would be much better additions to the line up since they would add some useful variety to a unique brand instead of following a current trend.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 07:54 AM
  #33  
JoanieB's Avatar
JoanieB
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 1
From: San Diego County, California
Originally Posted by mini stig
I love the CM and I hope to get one someday. I think it does fit the MINI brand because all the cars it competes against are bigger so its MINI by those standards. [...] The Paceman and the coupe are (in my opinion) out of place. The PM is a waste I think, with the same space as a CM but with less access to it. The coupe would be alright if it had more power, but the most powerful versions of it will rival a new Corvette on price after adding options and way above the cars they want to compete against
Hmmm, don't understand your logic here. You like the bigger, slower CM, because it goes up against even bigger SUVs, but you don't like the Coupe because it is slow? Have you driven one? Because it's exactly the same as the equivalent Hardtop, if anything it's a bit faster especially in corners (being stiffer) and it's a heck of a lot faster than the CM. You can dislike it for the styling, maybe, but not for being slow, since it is just as fast as anything MINI makes and just as fun to drive.

As I said before, to my mind the Coupe is at least an extension of the small/nimble/quirky factor. It has essentially the same MINI factors that the HTs and cabrios do. Same big speedo, same window controls in the center, etc. However, the CM tends to be more like every other car out there, losing that quick and quirky factor. (and everything said here about the Coupe also applies to the Roadster, which is a logical extension)

The Paceman, on the other hand, is just
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 12:10 PM
  #34  
Rgoodwin's Avatar
Rgoodwin
4th Gear
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Thumbs up JoanieB!
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 12:57 PM
  #35  
avuton's Avatar
avuton
3rd Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Originally Posted by JoanieB
The Paceman, on the other hand, is just
Time for a "Paceman Haters" thread
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 01:13 PM
  #36  
Lady_May's Avatar
Lady_May
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, Va
To chime in, I do understand the 'hate' towards the countryman/paceman. And yes they are bigger, however, I still think they are fundamentally mini. Being a 1stgen S' as my first mini, I still kick myself every single day for selling her. My heart has been pining since 2010. If I had my way and was rich as hell I would have one of everything. I'd still have my R53 and my new R60 and a roadster and a convertible, but that's just because I love love love everything mini. I think they each have their place, I wouldn't be able to fit my dogs and my hubs in a roadster but would have plenty of room in the countryman and yet still have the fun and experience of a mini. So, someday, when I don't have an 80 pound dog and don't have to lug kids or husband, maybe ill be able to have my own mini fleet in the garage.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 01:21 PM
  #37  
Braminator's Avatar
Braminator
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,242
Likes: 53
From: Wherever she takes me.
It evolution. We went from this

From this


To this


To this


So as you see companies are out to make money, so they build other models or change existing models to appeal to a larger audience. Whether EVERYONE likes what they build is subject to your own tastes. This is just my 2 cents.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 01:42 PM
  #38  
JoanieB's Avatar
JoanieB
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 1
From: San Diego County, California
Originally Posted by avuton
Time for a "Paceman Haters" thread
Not hatin' on it, Avuton, just not understanding the reasoning behind it. A two door the size of a four door? With room in the back to take people, or carry kids, but less amenable access to those back seats? I don't see what niche it fills. All of the others make sense, but this one remains a mystery for now.

On the other hand, the new ClubVan is an interesting development, and might just catch on with small delivery businesses. It fills a specific niche. A two seat delivery van, with barn doors, and MINI agility and handling.

The Paceman is a two door, four seat, raked roof Countryman... does someone have insight into what they are targeting?
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 01:56 PM
  #39  
Braminator's Avatar
Braminator
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,242
Likes: 53
From: Wherever she takes me.
The Paceman is a two door, four seat, raked roof Countryman



hmmm
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 02:12 PM
  #40  
JoanieB's Avatar
JoanieB
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 1
From: San Diego County, California
Yep, just like that!

So, for anyone considering a Paceman, what would your internal deliberation be, between it and the CM? Not having to polish that second set of door handles? You only have short friends for the back seats? Curious minds want to know....!

Originally Posted by Braminator


hmmm
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 02:40 PM
  #41  
Lady_May's Avatar
Lady_May
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, Va
Originally Posted by JoanieB
You only have short friends for the back seats? Curious minds want to know....!
Maybe they just have big dogs....like me!!!! Still not sure about the paceman tho.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 02:42 PM
  #42  
amancuso's Avatar
amancuso
5th Gear
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
From: Burlington, New Jersey
Originally Posted by Tommy Kardinal
I am 100% with you on this. Let's not forget that this is a BMW after all you'd think they could use the same materials that they use in their cars. Especially since, lets face it, MINIs are ~$28k cars. Sure the base hatches start at $21, but all the other cars in the line up use that same interior and start at a much higher price, a price at which you'd expect better materials. And that's just assuming you don't get a single option on it, which no one really does, so even after buying your base hatch your still looking at around $25k.

The fit and finish of the center console could be a little better as well and I completely agree with you on the gauges. I just wish that for a car of that cost whose parent makes the Ultimate Driving Machines, they would have used better materials and fitted them better.

With that said the MINI does have a good amount of soft touch materials on top of the dash and on the doors (however the area around the back seats is all plastic) and, at least on my MINI, they do a good job at not being worn out. In all I love the interior style and everything at least works, but i just wish the quality could have been bumped up to match the price of these things

Seriously? Have you been in a Nissan Versa/Cube or A Toyota Yaris? Kia Rio? Go spend some time in those and feel the materials, then complain to me about a MINI.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 02:45 PM
  #43  
Lady_May's Avatar
Lady_May
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Alexandria, Va
Originally Posted by amancuso
Seriously? Have you been in a Nissan Versa/Cube or A Toyota Yaris? Kia Rio? Go spend some time in those and feel the materials, then complain to me about a MINI.
JESUS Yes!!!!! I have been driving a cube in between my R53 mini and my new All4. Do you have any idea what HELL I have been in?? PURE HELL. I CALL IT THE PIECE OF SH*t TOASTER OVEN.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 03:35 PM
  #44  
Braminator's Avatar
Braminator
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,242
Likes: 53
From: Wherever she takes me.
This is why manufacturers extend their line up.

http://www.motoringfile.com/2013/01/...ry/#more-27717
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 04:08 PM
  #45  
Chili4's Avatar
Chili4
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
I'm still getting used to the paceman. I also swore I'd never buy a four door wrangler (but we did). I love my Countryman. I bought it out of sheer practicality. I wanted something fun, but I still needed four doors. And it was so fun to drive. It felt like I didn't have to grow up quite yet and settle for a regular old car. If I wasn't so practical I would have gone for a two door in a heartbeat.

It's my first foray into the mini world and I love it probably because I have no previous mini experience to compare it to. I have driven Nissans, Mazdas, Windstars, Subarus WRX and Outback, Dodge Durango, and Jeeps.

My favorite for fun? My 2 door Wrangler and the Countryman. I would buy either of those again in a heartbeat. The AWD is awesome because we move every couple of years and from Alaska to the East Coast it can come in handy.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 04:46 PM
  #46  
area49's Avatar
area49
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Concur with rant,

Unfortunetely the Germans have always been about efficiency and substance over style.

Cheap interior materials is wide spread across most makers and platforms.

When I bought my new 50k Challenger I was amazed how cheap and plasticky most of the interior was except for the seat.

I'm sure there's some bean counter telling someone that's the way it has to be or we won't be able to sell it at a price point we can make $.

If Mini goes to far astray from their legacy and heritage models they'll come out with a "retro" model, this convention works, (aka: Voltswagon Bug, Dodge Challenger, Ford Mustang, Chev Camero, etc,).

They've all done it, what's old becomes new again at some point.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 05:15 PM
  #47  
Braminator's Avatar
Braminator
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,242
Likes: 53
From: Wherever she takes me.
When I bought my new 50k Challenger I was amazed how cheap and plasticky most of the interior was except for the seat.
And yet you still bought it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 05:43 PM
  #48  
-=gRaY rAvEn=-'s Avatar
-=gRaY rAvEn=-
Moderator
iTrader: (43)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 69
From: Cape of Cod
Originally Posted by JoanieB
Not hatin' on it, Avuton, just not understanding the reasoning behind it. A two door the size of a four door? With room in the back to take people, or carry kids, but less amenable access to those back seats? I don't see what niche it fills. All of the others make sense, but this one remains a mystery for now.
Yeah, a rather atrractive two door version of the Countryman with sleaker roof lines and boot and less of a hint of being a "family truckster" makes absolutely no sense...






























Someone hasn't been paying attention.....
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 08:20 PM
  #49  
JoanieB's Avatar
JoanieB
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 1
From: San Diego County, California
Hmmmm point taken, Grey Raven, but aren't all of those bigger cars, consequently easier to climb into through that front door? If you NEED four seats, wouldn't you just buy the four door model?

And thanks for those photos... there sure are some ugly fuggly cars in the world, aren't there?
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2013 | 09:04 PM
  #50  
JoanieB's Avatar
JoanieB
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 1
From: San Diego County, California
From an AutoWeek review of the Evoque Coupe (the three door as opposed to the five door model):
If you're in the market for a coupe, you probably don't need the rear seats often, so I won't harp about the contortionist exercises needed to get my kids' car seats (not to mention the kids themselves) into the rear seats; to Land Rover's credit, there's actually quite a bit of room back there. It's just difficult to access -- no surprise there.

Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...#ixzz2HjZzl2Uj

Also: But there's some good stuff here, too, particularly if one looks at the Evoque -- as I tend to -- as a go-anywhere do-anything all-weather hot(ish) hatch for a single person or empty nesters. Looked at that way, it's pretty cool.

Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...#ixzz2HjaRbLk9

And Land Rover estimates that 80% of American sales will be for the five door. So, people who only want the rear seats sometimes and don't mind standing on their heads to get in when they do need the seats.. and the Evoque Coupe is $1000 MORE than the five door.

My son points out that his Mitsubishi Eclipse had back seats... of a sort... but it mostly qualified the car for cheaper insurance that way. At least, that is what he understood to be the case. Is it?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:58 AM.