My MINI Rant
.--snip--
I hate what they've done with the interior of the new hatches. I hate that they blacked out the steering wheel, tachometer rim or whatever I should call it and the center console. It looks awful and I hate it. It was so much more pleasing with the silver contrast. I also hate that the plastic piece between the sun visors is now black as well. There's no reason to do that! I also hate that after all these years the panoramic sunroof still isn't auto open/close. I have to hold it all through those 5 seconds or so (granted it doesn't sound like a lot but to me it's annoying) and it slowly tilts then slides back. I feel pretty indifferent about what they've done with the radio. I feel like both the design with the volume control above the CD (2nd gen) and the volume in the speedo (3rd gen) are both just awkward configurations, but I could care less. I also strongly dislike how the, for lack of better word, cover above the rear licence plate is no longer chrome unless you get the chrome package. I also am not a fan of how when you want the chrome package you have to get the chrome mirrors (according to the MINI build it website). Lastly I wish the armrest wasn't a flimsy POS, and that it came standard.

I've gotten a R55, R58 and R59 from the dealer as a loaner. These models were not for me, and I have no problem with MINI diluting the brand by designing them... as long as they continue making the Coop.
The 2012 R55 felt like a big black hurse with everything blacked out. The black plastic gives it a cheaper, less solid feeling. This one even had the MINI You package and it just felt and looked cheap. This is not indicitive of the Mini You package, as I've seen one that looked beautiful. The one I was loaned just had terrible contrast between black interior, blueish/white mini you leather dash.
The 2012 R58/R59 have an extremely limited rear view, which I really enjoy in my car. But again, with the black plasticky interior. So bad. Even the blacked out interiors of the headlights are very hokey looking, in my opinion.
Another point I'd like to make it MINI's redirection toward bigger cars (Countryman and the new Paceman). It's going in the completely wrong direction. MINIs are supposed to be small and fun but it seems that they just keep getting bigger and bigger and this really concerns me for when I decide to get a new pair of keys. I understand that most consumers are looking for something bigger and MINI is trying to supply them with it, but that's ruining the MINI brand. The addition of AWD is awesome no doubt, but I don't see a need to make a larger car to do it. Imagine how cool an AWD hatch would be! (granted it would probably be a tight fit). I also just saw that the new Paceman is going to have its window switches on the door. Like c'mon! That was a almost as big of a MINI trademark as the center speedo. But since people can't live without having them on the door they went and changed it, that's just not right in my book. Have some principle. And speaking of the Paceman, what's the point? I don't see any reason to make a 2 door version of the Countryman besides to replace the Cooper hatches. What's even worse is that I've looked at the hideous Countryman design long enough that I now almost like it.
MINI is supposed to be a special brand for the select few that are crazy and wild enough to handle it. I hate seeing MINIs driven by people who don't appreciate them or know what they're about. It ruins the charm of the car and the brand. I just hope that MINI can find it's way back to its roots, and soon.
If it were actually ever offered, I would hate having to own a second car

I do too, but I understand there are those who love them so I keep my mouth shut about this.

The only thing that you didn't cover that I'd rant about is about the interior. I wish they'd move to a different softer material, rather than the hard plastics. Maybe same material and a thin layer of soft rubber over it. Or maybe something different altogether, something that doesn't creak and break so easily.
In my dreams, the tach and speedo would have an actual glass lens in the front as well. I mean, this car cost is a premium, would be nice to use some premium materials on the interior. At this point, I'm glad that MINI exists though. Couldn't imagine driving anything else.
The only thing that you didn't cover that I'd rant about is about the interior. I wish they'd move to a different softer material, rather than the hard plastics. Maybe same material and a thin layer of soft rubber over it. Or maybe something different altogether, something that doesn't creak and break so easily.
In my dreams, the tach and speedo would have an actual glass lens in the front as well. I mean, this car cost is a premium, would be nice to use some premium materials on the interior. At this point, I'm glad that MINI exists though. Couldn't imagine driving anything else.
In my dreams, the tach and speedo would have an actual glass lens in the front as well. I mean, this car cost is a premium, would be nice to use some premium materials on the interior. At this point, I'm glad that MINI exists though. Couldn't imagine driving anything else.
The fit and finish of the center console could be a little better as well and I completely agree with you on the gauges. I just wish that for a car of that cost whose parent makes the Ultimate Driving Machines, they would have used better materials and fitted them better.
With that said the MINI does have a good amount of soft touch materials on top of the dash and on the doors (however the area around the back seats is all plastic) and, at least on my MINI, they do a good job at not being worn out. In all I love the interior style and everything at least works, but i just wish the quality could have been bumped up to match the price of these things
I've been thinking of this ever since I heard the countyman was going to have the window controls on the door. I think MINI are losing some of the personality by doing this. Their new ads say "Not Normal" but normal cars have all the same button layouts and MINI seem to be going this way. I love the CM and I hope to get one someday. I think it does fit the MINI brand because all the cars it competes against are bigger so its MINI by those standards. I can understand it's existence because as as families grow so does the need for a bit more space. The Paceman and the coupe are (in my opinion) out of place. The PM is a waste I think, with the same space as a CM but with less access to it. The coupe would be alright if it had more power, but the most powerful versions of it will rival a new Corvette on price after adding options and way above the cars they want to compete against. If they want to expand I would like to see a MINI pickup. I think one of the changes that will be made sometime will be to put LEDs or halo rings in the headlights like the current trend. I love my R50 and plan to keep it till the wheels fall off then put them back on and go again. Its the perfect car for city driving and sporty blast on the weekends.
To add a thing that has been bothering me recently is MINI pulling out of WRC. The car they had built can rival anything in the WRC but with no factory team they will not get a good driver to put it at the top. Now with VW coming in I think they will totally overshadow all the effort that MINI put in and failed to follow up on. I just really hate the thought of losing to VW.
To add a thing that has been bothering me recently is MINI pulling out of WRC. The car they had built can rival anything in the WRC but with no factory team they will not get a good driver to put it at the top. Now with VW coming in I think they will totally overshadow all the effort that MINI put in and failed to follow up on. I just really hate the thought of losing to VW.
Corvettes never entered the equation.
I've been thinking of this ever since I heard the countyman was going to have the window controls on the door. I think MINI are losing some of the personality by doing this. Their new ads say "Not Normal" but normal cars have all the same button layouts and MINI seem to be going this way. I love the CM and I hope to get one someday. I think it does fit the MINI brand because all the cars it competes against are bigger so its MINI by those standards. I can understand it's existence because as as families grow so does the need for a bit more space. The Paceman and the coupe are (in my opinion) out of place. The PM is a waste I think, with the same space as a CM but with less access to it. The coupe would be alright if it had more power, but the most powerful versions of it will rival a new Corvette on price after adding options and way above the cars they want to compete against. If they want to expand I would like to see a MINI pickup. I think one of the changes that will be made sometime will be to put LEDs or halo rings in the headlights like the current trend. I love my R50 and plan to keep it till the wheels fall off then put them back on and go again. Its the perfect car for city driving and sporty blast on the weekends.
To add a thing that has been bothering me recently is MINI pulling out of WRC. The car they had built can rival anything in the WRC but with no factory team they will not get a good driver to put it at the top. Now with VW coming in I think they will totally overshadow all the effort that MINI put in and failed to follow up on. I just really hate the thought of losing to VW.
To add a thing that has been bothering me recently is MINI pulling out of WRC. The car they had built can rival anything in the WRC but with no factory team they will not get a good driver to put it at the top. Now with VW coming in I think they will totally overshadow all the effort that MINI put in and failed to follow up on. I just really hate the thought of losing to VW.
I strongly share your opinion on the Paceman though. It's a step backwards from both the Hatch and the Countryman by combining the least convenient properties of both. The Rocketman and the rumored 5-door hatch based on the F56 would be much better additions to the line up since they would add some useful variety to a unique brand instead of following a current trend.
I love the CM and I hope to get one someday. I think it does fit the MINI brand because all the cars it competes against are bigger so its MINI by those standards. [...] The Paceman and the coupe are (in my opinion) out of place. The PM is a waste I think, with the same space as a CM but with less access to it. The coupe would be alright if it had more power, but the most powerful versions of it will rival a new Corvette on price after adding options and way above the cars they want to compete against
You can dislike it for the styling, maybe, but not for being slow, since it is just as fast as anything MINI makes and just as fun to drive.
As I said before, to my mind the Coupe is at least an extension of the small/nimble/quirky factor. It has essentially the same MINI factors that the HTs and cabrios do. Same big speedo, same window controls in the center, etc. However, the CM tends to be more like every other car out there, losing that quick and quirky factor. (and everything said here about the Coupe also applies to the Roadster, which is a logical extension)
The Paceman, on the other hand, is just


To chime in, I do understand the 'hate' towards the countryman/paceman. And yes they are bigger, however, I still think they are fundamentally mini. Being a 1stgen S' as my first mini, I still kick myself every single day for selling her. My heart has been pining since 2010. If I had my way and was rich as hell I would have one of everything. I'd still have my R53 and my new R60 and a roadster and a convertible, but that's just because I love love love everything mini. I think they each have their place, I wouldn't be able to fit my dogs and my hubs in a roadster but would have plenty of room in the countryman and yet still have the fun and experience of a mini. So, someday, when I don't have an 80 pound dog and don't have to lug kids or husband, maybe ill be able to have my own mini fleet in the garage.
It evolution. We went from this
From this

To this

To this

So as you see companies are out to make money, so they build other models or change existing models to appeal to a larger audience. Whether EVERYONE likes what they build is subject to your own tastes. This is just my 2 cents.
From this

To this
To this

So as you see companies are out to make money, so they build other models or change existing models to appeal to a larger audience. Whether EVERYONE likes what they build is subject to your own tastes. This is just my 2 cents.
Not hatin' on it, Avuton, just not understanding the reasoning behind it.
A two door the size of a four door? With room in the back to take people, or carry kids, but less amenable access to those back seats? I don't see what niche it fills. All of the others make sense, but this one remains a mystery for now.
On the other hand, the new ClubVan is an interesting development, and might just catch on with small delivery businesses. It fills a specific niche. A two seat delivery van, with barn doors, and MINI agility and handling.
The Paceman is a two door, four seat, raked roof Countryman... does someone have insight into what they are targeting?
A two door the size of a four door? With room in the back to take people, or carry kids, but less amenable access to those back seats? I don't see what niche it fills. All of the others make sense, but this one remains a mystery for now. On the other hand, the new ClubVan is an interesting development, and might just catch on with small delivery businesses. It fills a specific niche. A two seat delivery van, with barn doors, and MINI agility and handling.
The Paceman is a two door, four seat, raked roof Countryman... does someone have insight into what they are targeting?
Yep, just like that!
So, for anyone considering a Paceman, what would your internal deliberation be, between it and the CM? Not having to polish that second set of door handles? You only have short friends for the back seats?

Curious minds want to know....!
So, for anyone considering a Paceman, what would your internal deliberation be, between it and the CM? Not having to polish that second set of door handles? You only have short friends for the back seats?


Curious minds want to know....!I am 100% with you on this. Let's not forget that this is a BMW after all you'd think they could use the same materials that they use in their cars. Especially since, lets face it, MINIs are ~$28k cars. Sure the base hatches start at $21, but all the other cars in the line up use that same interior and start at a much higher price, a price at which you'd expect better materials. And that's just assuming you don't get a single option on it, which no one really does, so even after buying your base hatch your still looking at around $25k.
The fit and finish of the center console could be a little better as well and I completely agree with you on the gauges. I just wish that for a car of that cost whose parent makes the Ultimate Driving Machines, they would have used better materials and fitted them better.
With that said the MINI does have a good amount of soft touch materials on top of the dash and on the doors (however the area around the back seats is all plastic) and, at least on my MINI, they do a good job at not being worn out. In all I love the interior style and everything at least works, but i just wish the quality could have been bumped up to match the price of these things
The fit and finish of the center console could be a little better as well and I completely agree with you on the gauges. I just wish that for a car of that cost whose parent makes the Ultimate Driving Machines, they would have used better materials and fitted them better.
With that said the MINI does have a good amount of soft touch materials on top of the dash and on the doors (however the area around the back seats is all plastic) and, at least on my MINI, they do a good job at not being worn out. In all I love the interior style and everything at least works, but i just wish the quality could have been bumped up to match the price of these things
Seriously? Have you been in a Nissan Versa/Cube or A Toyota Yaris? Kia Rio? Go spend some time in those and feel the materials, then complain to me about a MINI.
JESUS Yes!!!!! I have been driving a cube in between my R53 mini and my new All4. Do you have any idea what HELL I have been in?? PURE HELL. I CALL IT THE PIECE OF SH*t TOASTER OVEN.
This is why manufacturers extend their line up.
http://www.motoringfile.com/2013/01/...ry/#more-27717
http://www.motoringfile.com/2013/01/...ry/#more-27717
I'm still getting used to the paceman. I also swore I'd never buy a four door wrangler (but we did). I love my Countryman. I bought it out of sheer practicality. I wanted something fun, but I still needed four doors. And it was so fun to drive. It felt like I didn't have to grow up quite yet and settle for a regular old car. If I wasn't so practical I would have gone for a two door in a heartbeat.
It's my first foray into the mini world and I love it probably because I have no previous mini experience to compare it to. I have driven Nissans, Mazdas, Windstars, Subarus WRX and Outback, Dodge Durango, and Jeeps.
My favorite for fun? My 2 door Wrangler and the Countryman. I would buy either of those again in a heartbeat. The AWD is awesome because we move every couple of years and from Alaska to the East Coast it can come in handy.
It's my first foray into the mini world and I love it probably because I have no previous mini experience to compare it to. I have driven Nissans, Mazdas, Windstars, Subarus WRX and Outback, Dodge Durango, and Jeeps.
My favorite for fun? My 2 door Wrangler and the Countryman. I would buy either of those again in a heartbeat. The AWD is awesome because we move every couple of years and from Alaska to the East Coast it can come in handy.
Concur with rant,
Unfortunetely the Germans have always been about efficiency and substance over style.
Cheap interior materials is wide spread across most makers and platforms.
When I bought my new 50k Challenger I was amazed how cheap and plasticky most of the interior was except for the seat.
I'm sure there's some bean counter telling someone that's the way it has to be or we won't be able to sell it at a price point we can make $.
If Mini goes to far astray from their legacy and heritage models they'll come out with a "retro" model, this convention works, (aka: Voltswagon Bug, Dodge Challenger, Ford Mustang, Chev Camero, etc,).
They've all done it, what's old becomes new again at some point.
Unfortunetely the Germans have always been about efficiency and substance over style.
Cheap interior materials is wide spread across most makers and platforms.
When I bought my new 50k Challenger I was amazed how cheap and plasticky most of the interior was except for the seat.
I'm sure there's some bean counter telling someone that's the way it has to be or we won't be able to sell it at a price point we can make $.
If Mini goes to far astray from their legacy and heritage models they'll come out with a "retro" model, this convention works, (aka: Voltswagon Bug, Dodge Challenger, Ford Mustang, Chev Camero, etc,).
They've all done it, what's old becomes new again at some point.
Not hatin' on it, Avuton, just not understanding the reasoning behind it.
A two door the size of a four door? With room in the back to take people, or carry kids, but less amenable access to those back seats? I don't see what niche it fills. All of the others make sense, but this one remains a mystery for now.
A two door the size of a four door? With room in the back to take people, or carry kids, but less amenable access to those back seats? I don't see what niche it fills. All of the others make sense, but this one remains a mystery for now.










Someone hasn't been paying attention.....
Hmmmm point taken, Grey Raven, but aren't all of those bigger cars, consequently easier to climb into through that front door? If you NEED four seats, wouldn't you just buy the four door model?
And thanks for those photos... there sure are some ugly fuggly cars in the world, aren't there?


And thanks for those photos... there sure are some ugly fuggly cars in the world, aren't there?



From an AutoWeek review of the Evoque Coupe (the three door as opposed to the five door model):
If you're in the market for a coupe, you probably don't need the rear seats often, so I won't harp about the contortionist exercises needed to get my kids' car seats (not to mention the kids themselves) into the rear seats; to Land Rover's credit, there's actually quite a bit of room back there. It's just difficult to access -- no surprise there.
Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...#ixzz2HjZzl2Uj
Also: But there's some good stuff here, too, particularly if one looks at the Evoque -- as I tend to -- as a go-anywhere do-anything all-weather hot(ish) hatch for a single person or empty nesters. Looked at that way, it's pretty cool.
Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...#ixzz2HjaRbLk9
And Land Rover estimates that 80% of American sales will be for the five door. So, people who only want the rear seats sometimes and don't mind standing on their heads to get in when they do need the seats.. and the Evoque Coupe is $1000 MORE than the five door.
My son points out that his Mitsubishi Eclipse had back seats... of a sort... but it mostly qualified the car for cheaper insurance that way. At least, that is what he understood to be the case. Is it?
If you're in the market for a coupe, you probably don't need the rear seats often, so I won't harp about the contortionist exercises needed to get my kids' car seats (not to mention the kids themselves) into the rear seats; to Land Rover's credit, there's actually quite a bit of room back there. It's just difficult to access -- no surprise there.
Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...#ixzz2HjZzl2Uj
Also: But there's some good stuff here, too, particularly if one looks at the Evoque -- as I tend to -- as a go-anywhere do-anything all-weather hot(ish) hatch for a single person or empty nesters. Looked at that way, it's pretty cool.
Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...#ixzz2HjaRbLk9
And Land Rover estimates that 80% of American sales will be for the five door. So, people who only want the rear seats sometimes and don't mind standing on their heads to get in when they do need the seats.. and the Evoque Coupe is $1000 MORE than the five door.
My son points out that his Mitsubishi Eclipse had back seats... of a sort... but it mostly qualified the car for cheaper insurance that way. At least, that is what he understood to be the case. Is it?







