General MINI Talk Shared experiences, motoring minutes, and other general MINI-related discussion that applies to all MINIs, regardless of model, year or trim.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Premium Fuel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 25, 2012 | 09:02 PM
  #26  
astroBlackMetallic_Mini's Avatar
astroBlackMetallic_Mini
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 14
From: FL
Originally Posted by Braminator
A $100. per month for 3 tanks (fill ups) of gas as you state 3 tanks of gas. Saving about $3.60 per tank. So $3.60 per tank (not $11.00) x 3 times he fills up = $10.80 of month x 12 months equals $129.60 a year. So my quick math came out to $100 per year.
So you are not saving $11.00 per tank as you state by using 87 gas you are only saving roughly $3.60 per tank.
Ah. I feel retarded now! Math never was my strong suite!
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2012 | 10:36 PM
  #27  
RobMuntean's Avatar
RobMuntean
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 5
From: West Bloomfield, Michigan
Always and religiously Shell 93. And once in a blue moon 94 from Sunoco.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 05:42 AM
  #28  
Pure87's Avatar
Pure87
4th Gear
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Maryland, USA
My manual recommends 93 and since my family's had a car die from using the wrong fuel in the past, I'm gonna keep using 93. Saving a few bucks is not worth the potential engine damage, especially considering the hit to performance and fuel efficiency.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 06:11 AM
  #29  
Braminator's Avatar
Braminator
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,242
Likes: 53
From: Wherever she takes me.
Ah. I feel retarded now! Math never was my strong suite!
No worries Astro. You wronte it when you had too much eggnog.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 07:36 AM
  #30  
Yam the Bomb's Avatar
Yam the Bomb
2nd Gear
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
I can't believe people would want to save a few cents per gallon that bad. Cut corners someplace else.

Don't run premium gas in a car that needs regular (just pollutes more.) and don't run less than premium in a car that requires premium.

The only difference in gas is the flash point. Premium has a higher temperature before it ignites. Regular ignites quicker and for that reason burns cleaner. Neither fuel is "better" than the other. Different vehicles have different requirements. Run the fuel that is correct for your vehicle.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 08:22 AM
  #31  
Braminator's Avatar
Braminator
OVERDRIVE
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,242
Likes: 53
From: Wherever she takes me.
Do be cheap on fuel period.
I think you meant don't be cheap.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 09:09 AM
  #32  
ricbow's Avatar
ricbow
5th Gear
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: nor cal
my cooper runs best with 91, it is a 10 1/2 to 1 compression motor. high pressure motors need 91.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 07:18 AM
  #33  
rfsilver123's Avatar
rfsilver123
Neutral
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by mrluckypa
Not necessarily true. I agree on a turbo engine but not on a normally aspirated one. If the manual says that you can run it on 87 then you can. Anything more would be a waste.
I recently bought a 2010 mini "cooper" for which the manual states ok to use 87. The dealer says 91. Since this car came off lease (great deal), my guess is the lessee used 87. The car runs fine. However, would it help to put prem in the car every 3-4 tanks to maybe clean the engine? Not sure.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 07:25 AM
  #34  
rfsilver123's Avatar
rfsilver123
Neutral
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by Yam the Bomb
I can't believe people would want to save a few cents per gallon that bad. Cut corners someplace else.

Don't run premium gas in a car that needs regular (just pollutes more.) and don't run less than premium in a car that requires premium.

The only difference in gas is the flash point. Premium has a higher temperature before it ignites. Regular ignites quicker and for that reason burns cleaner. Neither fuel is "better" than the other. Different vehicles have different requirements. Run the fuel that is correct for your vehicle.
I agree. My 2010 mini is the base car and the manual "recommends" prem but also states that 87 for my car is OK and will not result in shorter engine life. Its a little confusing. My dealer is emphatic about prem.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 07:32 AM
  #35  
rfsilver123's Avatar
rfsilver123
Neutral
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by astroBlackMetallic_Mini
Yes, a 13 gallon tank, but who runs theirs bone dry? I was estimating, as I try to put gas in when the idiot light comes on, so that's about 10 gallons eh? Hw do you get $100 per month from 3.60$ a tank?
Putting math aside, fill the car at 3 lit bars and it will take about 11 + gals leaving you with just under 2 gals remaining. Filling at 1 lit bar means you're on fumes and bad for the engine. The mini fuel gauge is a problem and you have to live with it and adjust to it. There is no fix.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 07:36 AM
  #36  
phoxx47's Avatar
phoxx47
2nd Gear
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Your car has a knock sensor. This will effectively compensate for poor/low octane fuel. The cost is performance and efficiency. I have found by experience over scores of tanks fuel that E0 premium fuel has returned, in my situation and in my car, fuel mileage that more than compensates for the additional cost of the fuel. It is like the premium gas pump is paying me to but that fuel.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 07:44 AM
  #37  
rfsilver123's Avatar
rfsilver123
Neutral
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Tanks!
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 08:58 AM
  #38  
san diego motoring's Avatar
san diego motoring
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
I M considering maybe using Costco gas to lower my fuel cost. So I contacted Costco and here is their response.

As a comparison, you may recognize the term "Top Tier." *In order to qualify for Top Tier an additive must contain about three times the EPA detergent requirement, and Costco's Clean Power dosage is five times the requirement. *However, the physical quantity of additive is only one measure. *The quality of the detergent can affect the amount of additive needed to meet the government requirement. *The EPA standard is performance based, i.e., they require only the amount needed to keep engines at a certain level of cleanliness. *Costco has tested our Kirkland Signature Clean Power detergent so our "5x" claim is performance-based.

Another Top Tier requirement is that it be available in all a company's fuel nation-wide. *Costco does not yet have Clean Power installed at all of our U.S. gas stations. *We plan to do so as fast as we can, at which time we will investigate whether to seek the official "Top Tier" designation. *The Top Tier program is administered by General Motors, and supported by several other automakers such as Toyota, Honda, BMW, VW, and Audi. *Here is a link to their website:*http://www.toptiergas.com/retailers.html

Most detergent additives use similar ingredients, and have the same effect in keeping your engine clean. *As I said above, Costco adds five times the government minimum requirement for detergent additive, which provided the maximum cleaning impact during our engine testing. *The only brand that uses as much additive as Costco is*Shell's V-power,*which is available in their premium fuel only. (V is the Roman numeral for 5, which stands for five times the government requirement). *Our KS Clean Power additive is made by one of the leading additive manufacturers in the U.S. and our*formula*is independently registered with the EPA. *


.....i will probably try it out in my other non mini to see the effects
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 11:58 AM
  #39  
rfsilver123's Avatar
rfsilver123
Neutral
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by RobMuntean
Always and religiously Shell 93. And once in a blue moon 94 from Sunoco.
By religiously do you mean saying "grace" each time?
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 12:03 PM
  #40  
RobMuntean's Avatar
RobMuntean
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 5
From: West Bloomfield, Michigan
Originally Posted by rfsilver123

By religiously do you mean saying "grace" each time?
Of course and then I say "Amen".
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 12:16 PM
  #41  
rfsilver123's Avatar
rfsilver123
Neutral
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by RobMuntean
Of course and then I say "Amen".
Have a nice day. Ciao.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 12:21 PM
  #42  
RobMuntean's Avatar
RobMuntean
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 5
From: West Bloomfield, Michigan
Originally Posted by rfsilver123

Have a nice day. Ciao.
All that just to respond back...anyways.


I'm curious if other people use or used 94 octane from Sunoco?
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 01:09 PM
  #43  
CA94960's Avatar
CA94960
4th Gear
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 549
Likes: 2
From: San Anselmo, California
We put 91 in our Clubman S as that's the highest you can buy in our area of California. 91 octane gas is roughly .20 cents a gallon more expensive than 87 and .10 cents more than 89. So if we fill up our car and put 10 gallons of 91 in it costs us $2 more a fill-up. My wife spends more than that getting her Latte.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2013 | 02:00 PM
  #44  
mini coop's Avatar
mini coop
6th Gear
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 52
From: World Championship 50 Fans
Manual says minimum 89 and recommended is 91 for my 2012 base. I use 93 octane only.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2013 | 08:55 PM
  #45  
afadeev's Avatar
afadeev
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 7
From: NYC
Originally Posted by phoxx47
Your car has a knock sensor. This will effectively compensate for poor/low octane fuel. The cost is performance and efficiency. I have found by experience over scores of tanks fuel that E0 premium fuel has returned, in my situation and in my car, fuel mileage that more than compensates for the additional cost of the fuel. It is like the premium gas pump is paying me to but that fuel.
Bingo !
FWIW, I can always tell when my wife fills out our MCS with regular 87 octane. The mileage drops by ~5-10%, and so does the power.

Mileage drop itself is not enough to compensate for the extra cost of 91 or 93 gas, but it I was that much of a cheap-***, I would have bought a Justa to begin with. If you spent the extra change on the turbo engine, don't short change yourself on power and fill up with the highest octane fuel you can find!

YMMV,
a
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2013 | 09:29 PM
  #46  
squawSkiBum's Avatar
squawSkiBum
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 341
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Originally Posted by astroBlackMetallic_Mini
Ah. I feel retarded now! Math never was my strong suite!
Never mind spelling...
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2013 | 09:35 PM
  #47  
squawSkiBum's Avatar
squawSkiBum
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 341
From: San Francisco Bay Area
Originally Posted by rfsilver123
Filling at 1 lit bar means you're on fumes and bad for the engine.
How so? So long as the fuel pump isn't sucking air, there's no possibility of damaging the engine.

The mini fuel gauge is a problem and you have to live with it and adjust to it. There is no fix.
I suppose that depends on the year and/or specific car - while my fuel gauge is very non-linear, I find that I can run down to miles-to-go in the teens with no problem. A bit spooky to convert the miles to go into a mental image of how much gas is in the tank though.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2013 | 09:36 PM
  #48  
astroBlackMetallic_Mini's Avatar
astroBlackMetallic_Mini
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 14
From: FL
Oh geeeez! That's x2 retarded! Lol

Well, I'm stuck with overpriced 91 octane here in SD. Def got worse mileage when I could only get 91. For some strange reason, I started getting Better mileage once I got out of GA?!... Makes me wonder, if FL is doing something to the gas, or if the air density makes a better mixture in the middle of the country...
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 08:18 AM
  #49  
CA94960's Avatar
CA94960
4th Gear
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 549
Likes: 2
From: San Anselmo, California
Originally Posted by afadeev

Mileage drop itself is not enough to compensate for the extra cost of 91 or 93 gas, but it I was that much of a cheap-***, I would have bought a Justa to begin with.

YMMV,
I'm wondering how the Justa owners are going to take that?
 
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 09:00 AM
  #50  
mikeandtricie's Avatar
mikeandtricie
1st Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 40
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by afadeev
Bingo !
FWIW, I can always tell when my wife fills out our MCS with regular 87 octane. The mileage drops by ~5-10%, and so does the power.

Mileage drop itself is not enough to compensate for the extra cost of 91 or 93 gas, but it I was that much of a cheap-***, I would have bought a Justa to begin with. If you spent the extra change on the turbo engine, don't short change yourself on power and fill up with the highest octane fuel you can find!

YMMV,
a
I agree with you here. From what I've experienced, the numbers go like this... (Not official numbers):

I get 400 miles to the full tank using 91. So if I get 5% less using 87 that would be 380 Miles. Now 20 miles is about 2/3 a gallon so we'll say about $2.60 (I live in California). I save about $0.20 a gallon so on a full tank of 87, that's about $2.60 savings. So to get 400 miles like I'd get on 91, I'd have to buy $2.60 more gas from a fill up with 87.

Maybe my math is off, but I'm using less gas with 91 and getting better performance... with the big picture, I'll stick with 91.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:34 PM.