Drivetrain R53 Performance Data Discussion
R53 Performance Data Discussion
So what should be the right acceleration perforance test common to all of us all over the world?
Should it be 30-130
30-90 in 3rd very much like a dyno pull 2000-7000
Should it be 30-130
30-90 in 3rd very much like a dyno pull 2000-7000
I think that 0-60mph or 0-100kph would be best, since you can't go 130mph on the street legally. (I assume your numbers are mph) Even so, 130kph (80mph) is still beyond the interstate speed limits.
Paul...in the US we are limited to at most 80mph by law and highways marked with that speed are only found in TX.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_l..._United_States
You'll find vast areas that are limited to 70MPH tops.
This idea could be a good one but please do not create a chart with a top speed that will expose NAM members to possible legal issues.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_l..._United_States
You'll find vast areas that are limited to 70MPH tops.
This idea could be a good one but please do not create a chart with a top speed that will expose NAM members to possible legal issues.
Beside the obvious problems Gnatster points out, do we all care? I'm perfectly happy with what I have, drive my car next to other high performance cars every day and know exactly what it will do. Do I really care what some MINI's on the other side of the world are doing? No offense, but not really. Don't get me wrong, if my schedule clears in a few weeks and I have nothing else to do, I could take some measurements for fun, but it's not a priority, and frankly, not that important to me.
Paul...in the US we are limited to at most 80mph by law and highways marked with that speed are only found in TX.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_l..._United_States
You'll find vast areas that are limited to 70MPH tops.
This idea could be a good one but please do not create a chart with a top speed that will expose NAM members to possible legal issues.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_l..._United_States
You'll find vast areas that are limited to 70MPH tops.
This idea could be a good one but please do not create a chart with a top speed that will expose NAM members to possible legal issues.
We have the same speed limit here thats why the 30-70 3rd gear one is agood one, unfortunatley the later boxes cant get to 70 in 2nd unless there rev limiter is raised.
30-130
http://www.lancerregister.com/mlr_30...entid=20080308
60-130
http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/9...andings-4.html
3rd Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Camano Island, WA, but wish was still Oahu, Hawaii
This is just a question. How does the difference in gearing between <05 and the >=05 affect this? Or is the gearing difference only certain gears?
Trending Topics
Beside the obvious problems Gnatster points out, do we all care? I'm perfectly happy with what I have, drive my car next to other high performance cars every day and know exactly what it will do. Do I really care what some MINI's on the other side of the world are doing? No offense, but not really. Don't get me wrong, if my schedule clears in a few weeks and I have nothing else to do, I could take some measurements for fun, but it's not a priority, and frankly, not that important to me.
It should be treated as a bit of fun, but some may take it more seriously and organise days like the MLR did.
I think having the weights recorded like they did on the day would help in cases like yours where you might have the heavist car out there in NAM world.
If we ever did a table, gearbox year would be valuable information.
...as would tire diameter.

All this is going to do is start another argument about how times are being recorded, if the road is down-hill, up-hill, temperature, altitude, humidity, etc etc. There is never going to be a definitive test of cars in different places at different times.
Edit: Right on, batrugger.
Won't do 70 in 3rd? 
All this is going to do is start another argument about how times are being recorded, if the road is down-hill, up-hill, temperature, altitude, humidity, etc etc. There is never going to be a definitive test of cars in different places at different times.
Edit: Right on, batrugger.

All this is going to do is start another argument about how times are being recorded, if the road is down-hill, up-hill, temperature, altitude, humidity, etc etc. There is never going to be a definitive test of cars in different places at different times.
Edit: Right on, batrugger.
You all make good points but I still think it'll be closer as a % terms than Gnatster dyno weekend.
It would be better also that if you found an airfield / road course that could let you do it like the MLR register do it over here.
20 mini's togeather 1 x performance box = loads of fun
It would be better also that if you found an airfield / road course that could let you do it like the MLR register do it over here.
20 mini's togeather 1 x performance box = loads of fun
why not just 30-90 as fast as you can? Hmm, or 50-90 in 3rd...
30-90 is more like a dyno run 2k-7k, with a performance box and knowing exactly what mph your car is doing at 2k and 7k you can check what the ET is, as you change things you can re check and see if you have improved.
The only problem is it takes you past the 70 mph speed limit
The only problem is it takes you past the 70 mph speed limit
You all make good points but I still think it'll be closer as a % terms than Gnatster dyno weekend.
It would be better also that if you found an airfield / road course that could let you do it like the MLR register do it over here.
20 mini's togeather 1 x performance box = loads of fun
It would be better also that if you found an airfield / road course that could let you do it like the MLR register do it over here.
20 mini's togeather 1 x performance box = loads of fun
You all make good points but I still think it'll be closer as a % terms than Gnatster dyno weekend.
It would be better also that if you found an airfield / road course that could let you do it like the MLR register do it over here.
20 mini's togeather 1 x performance box = loads of fun
It would be better also that if you found an airfield / road course that could let you do it like the MLR register do it over here.
20 mini's togeather 1 x performance box = loads of fun
Pretty much said what I was wondering. There is no point of doing this. Most of know what these cars are capeable of with each and certain part. I also would love to play with diffrent cars vs against another Mini.
Texas is the place to be this the Texas mile event, so you could run your performance box at the same time.
http://texasmile.net/index.php?optio...d=15&Itemid=30
http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=PUyf3g...eature=related
but then again he does run this in the 1/4
http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=TJBRZe...eature=related
http://texasmile.net/index.php?optio...d=15&Itemid=30
http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=PUyf3g...eature=related
but then again he does run this in the 1/4
http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=TJBRZe...eature=related
Last edited by Paul Webster; Nov 25, 2008 at 05:48 AM.
unfortunately there's one problem with the 1st link
"Who can compete in 60-130 events?
Any car or driver can complete as long as they have a car that is at least a mid to low 12 second 1/4 mile car. Cars running slower than this will not be able to get to 130 mph before its time to slow down on the track. "
with the Texas mile it looks like they only check your top speed, not your acceleration
"Who can compete in 60-130 events?
Any car or driver can complete as long as they have a car that is at least a mid to low 12 second 1/4 mile car. Cars running slower than this will not be able to get to 130 mph before its time to slow down on the track. "
with the Texas mile it looks like they only check your top speed, not your acceleration


