Drivetrain 210 whp!!!
210 whp!!!
I just got back from Mynes performance in Mesa, AZ after a dyno tune. I have a 05 MCSc, 6 speed. My base power was 192.3 whp @6750. My base torque was 157.2 @4500. I currently have a 15% pulley, CAI, Oneball exhaust and Megan headers with the test pipe. Anyways, after tuning, my test power was 210 whp @7500 and my test torque was 167 @4000. Pretty good results for a mod that didn't even require a screwdriver!
Jason is the man!!!
Jason is the man!!!
Last edited by ChaChaCha; Sep 25, 2007 at 05:16 PM. Reason: mis spelling
I just got back from Myles performance in Mesa, AZ after a dyno tune. I have a 05 MCSc, 6 speed. My base power was 192.3 whp @6750. My base torque was 157.2 @4500. I currently have a 15% pulley, CAI, Oneball exhaust and Megan headers with the test pipe. Anyways, after tuning, my test power was 210 whp @7500 and my test torque was 167 @4000. Pretty good results for a mod that didn't even require a screwdriver!
Jason is the man!!!
Jason is the man!!!
Trending Topics
Can someone explain to me why software changes give power increases? What sort of sacrifices are being made? Things always balance out... A gain somewhere is a loss some where else... Reliability issues? Idle issues? Gas mileage changes? I have a 15% and a CAI. I have been told by very reliable sources that an ECU change really won't add much.
I don't know if this was a sarcastic remark or not but Jason at Mynes performance is a reputable tuner. I believe he tunes Isellems mini and tuned/ and helped develop the Fireball cars. Anyways, you don't agree with these numbers?
I thought it was perfectly clear what I wrote.
That is an impressive power increase, but more impressive was the torque increase, which is at 500 rpm lower than before. Does the dyno graph indicate what the horsepower was at 6750 rpm? If so, mind stating what it was?
Did you have air/fuel ratios plotted? If so, what were they before and after say at 5500 rpm on?
Were the ambient conditions almost the same for both dyno tests?
Did you have air/fuel ratios plotted? If so, what were they before and after say at 5500 rpm on?
Were the ambient conditions almost the same for both dyno tests?
Last edited by SteveS; Sep 25, 2007 at 05:56 PM.
Daaayum, 210 and 167 is nice.
That was my question too SteveS. What was the whp at 6750RPM after the tune? Obviously they raised the rev limiter to get you to 7,500 after the tune and some more peak power, but it would be interesting to see the comparison at the lower RPMs, before and after tune. I don't think I'd want to be running my MCS at 7,500 too often
When we did our club Dyno day at Mynes last year they sent us all a plot after the event.
Mine looked like this:
http://www.coopahs.com/pdfs/coopahs-...lley012707.pdf
At the time an 05 MCS with 15% pulley and DDM CAI, everything else stock.
Very impressive place, and Justin definitely has a solid reputation.
That was my question too SteveS. What was the whp at 6750RPM after the tune? Obviously they raised the rev limiter to get you to 7,500 after the tune and some more peak power, but it would be interesting to see the comparison at the lower RPMs, before and after tune. I don't think I'd want to be running my MCS at 7,500 too often

When we did our club Dyno day at Mynes last year they sent us all a plot after the event.
Mine looked like this:
http://www.coopahs.com/pdfs/coopahs-...lley012707.pdf
At the time an 05 MCS with 15% pulley and DDM CAI, everything else stock.
Very impressive place, and Justin definitely has a solid reputation.
Last edited by danjmcs; Sep 25, 2007 at 06:01 PM.
If you edit your post or post a new reply, you can go to the Advanced editor and click on the paperclip in the menu above the typing area. It will let you browse to where you have the file on your computer, and upload/attach it to the message.
I had mine stored on my website, so I just pasted in the link to it on my previous post. But here it is attached as I described.
I had mine stored on my website, so I just pasted in the link to it on my previous post. But here it is attached as I described.
Can someone explain to me why software changes give power increases? What sort of sacrifices are being made? Things always balance out... A gain somewhere is a loss some where else... Reliability issues? Idle issues? Gas mileage changes? I have a 15% and a CAI. I have been told by very reliable sources that an ECU change really won't add much.
ChaChaCha, I'm glad you are happy with your tune, the important part is that the car feels better and you know the air/fuels are safe. I had to learn the hard way, on going too lean.
Mario
__________________
2013 GP2 #295, 270whp/310wtq, KO4 47mm Turbo, 18" NM Wheels, Alta intake, Manic Stage III+, HFS-3 Meth, 30% E85 Blend, Forged IC, Alta Hot Pipe, P&P/Ceramic Exhaust Manifold, m3 Extreme Ceramic DP, Vibrant mid res, 4" Double walled Tips, WMW/KW V3 CO, Alta Rear CA, CREE Fogs, Black out F/R Rings and Gas Cap, M7 CF Front Splitter, and No Stickers. MORE TO COME!! Previous 04Triple Black 17% Alta, MM Air/H2O, CAI, OBX Header, FBT Head, Shrick Cam, 234whp
2013 GP2 #295, 270whp/310wtq, KO4 47mm Turbo, 18" NM Wheels, Alta intake, Manic Stage III+, HFS-3 Meth, 30% E85 Blend, Forged IC, Alta Hot Pipe, P&P/Ceramic Exhaust Manifold, m3 Extreme Ceramic DP, Vibrant mid res, 4" Double walled Tips, WMW/KW V3 CO, Alta Rear CA, CREE Fogs, Black out F/R Rings and Gas Cap, M7 CF Front Splitter, and No Stickers. MORE TO COME!! Previous 04Triple Black 17% Alta, MM Air/H2O, CAI, OBX Header, FBT Head, Shrick Cam, 234whp
Last edited by MarioKart; Sep 25, 2007 at 07:12 PM.
your air fuels can be safe as safe is... if the car is being run too hard and heat builds up cause of improper cooling from mods you add after tuning etc etc you are going to loose the motor... so cha cha cha... watch out in the summer time... it's gets hot out there.... more over... CONGRATS!
Last edited by Tüls; Sep 25, 2007 at 07:31 PM.
You feel almost all of the improvements in the upper range. I only felt a slight improvement in the lower range, but definitely not a loss. As you can see by the graph, it was no slouch before the tune, but now it is crazy fast between 6500-7500. You can really feel the difference.
You feel almost all of the improvements in the upper range. I only felt a slight improvement in the lower range, but definitely not a loss. As you can see by the graph, it was no slouch before the tune, but now it is crazy fast between 6500-7500. You can really feel the difference.
I don;t see a loss in low end am I missing something?
This isn't a zero sum game...
Can someone explain to me why software changes give power increases? What sort of sacrifices are being made? Things always balance out... A gain somewhere is a loss some where else... Reliability issues? Idle issues? Gas mileage changes? I have a 15% and a CAI. I have been told by very reliable sources that an ECU change really won't add much.
Not all ECU tunes are created equal.
Matt



