Drivetrain (Cooper S) MINI Cooper S (R56) intakes, exhausts, pulleys, headers, throttle bodies, and any other modifications to the Cooper S drivetrain.

Drivetrain It's all fun till someone loses a piston

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 06:00 PM
  #1  
Mike@Tech Division's Avatar
Mike@Tech Division
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 436
Likes: 2
From: Garden Grove, CA
It's all fun till someone loses a piston

Just yanked these out of an R56.

Good reason to think twice about over boosting on stock internals



 

Last edited by Mike@Tech Division; Jun 8, 2011 at 11:14 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 06:05 PM
  #2  
wandrur's Avatar
wandrur
Moderator
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 11,899
Likes: 2
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Whoops.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 06:15 PM
  #3  
BMUN8IVE's Avatar
BMUN8IVE
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 183
Likes: 2
From: NoVA/DC
damn! Should make a nice conversational paper weight!
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 06:19 PM
  #4  
-=gRaY rAvEn=-'s Avatar
-=gRaY rAvEn=-
Moderator
iTrader: (43)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 70
From: Cape of Cod
Bummer.....What sorta numbers were they pushing before this happened ?
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 06:20 PM
  #5  
Duvivr6's Avatar
Duvivr6
2nd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Key West, FL
damn some massive carnage!
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 06:23 PM
  #6  
Mike@Tech Division's Avatar
Mike@Tech Division
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 436
Likes: 2
From: Garden Grove, CA
Originally Posted by -=gRay rAvEn=-
Bummer.....What sorta numbers were they pushing before this happened ?
It was about 215 WHP and 20 psi.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 06:26 PM
  #7  
BMUN8IVE's Avatar
BMUN8IVE
3rd Gear
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 183
Likes: 2
From: NoVA/DC
Originally Posted by Mike@Tech Division
It was about 215 WHP and 20 psi.
wow, all things considered that seems pretty conservative numbers, certainly nothing CRAZY, for stock internals, unless I am way off base. . . maybe I need to lighten up on the far right pedal.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 06:32 PM
  #8  
///Mflossin's Avatar
///Mflossin
4th Gear
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
mis-shift?
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 06:38 PM
  #9  
-=gRaY rAvEn=-'s Avatar
-=gRaY rAvEn=-
Moderator
iTrader: (43)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 70
From: Cape of Cod
Could be the Brazilian pre-07' engines were bit more bulletproof than the new French 4 bangers.....
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 06:47 PM
  #10  
ofioliti's Avatar
ofioliti
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,268
Likes: 4
From: Always curious ...
Ouch.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 06:49 PM
  #11  
LadyGodiva's Avatar
LadyGodiva
6th Gear
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 18,884
Likes: 1
From: Asheville,NC
That's a bad day.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 06:57 PM
  #12  
MiniBOL's Avatar
MiniBOL
4th Gear
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 597
Likes: 8
From: Las Vegas, NV
Which leads me to my question...I have a stock '07 MCS and was planning to get the Accessport before getting exhaust, CAI, etc. This something I should worry about? Sorry this is prolly a question that a noob would ask and I am a noob when it comes to Minis and turbocharged cars.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 07:04 PM
  #13  
orangecrush's Avatar
orangecrush
6th Gear
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,782
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC.
Originally Posted by Mike@Tech Division
It was about 215 WHP and 20 psi.
Mike,

Can you explain a bit? How was 215 causing that? If that’s the case, I’d better back way off mine...lol.

Mark
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 07:10 PM
  #14  
niquemarshall's Avatar
niquemarshall
4th Gear
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Ouch
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 08:11 PM
  #15  
Mike@Tech Division's Avatar
Mike@Tech Division
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 436
Likes: 2
From: Garden Grove, CA
Originally Posted by orangecrush
Mike,

Can you explain a bit? How was 215 causing that? If that’s the case, I’d better back way off mine...lol.

Mark
It's out of an '07 MCS with about 50k on it, FMIC and intake. It was tuned but I will not say how or by whom to avoid the inevitable lock out and to keep things on topic.

The HP level was not the killer. There are quite a few MCS's running fine so far at that power level. From the obvious failure of the piston and the relatively low wear on the engine, it can be safely assumed that boost was the culprit.

The main point of the post and what I have been trying to tell people is that there is no need for the 20+ psi maps when it only nets about 2-5 more HP and causes this. This is talking average PSI at WOT, not spikes.

The JCW handles a little more since it has lower C/R, but don't expect a lot from those pistons either.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 09:12 PM
  #16  
WayMotorWorks's Avatar
WayMotorWorks
Vendor
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,622
Likes: 804
From: Atlanta, GA
Mike FYI your in the Cooper NON S forum maybe you can get this moved

I've also seen this so if you need a matching piston to that one I've got it
 
__________________

HOTCHKIS | DDM | CRAVEN | AKRAPOVIC | NM ENGINEERING | MEGAN | FORGE | OS GIKEN | POWERFLEX and more


Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 09:54 PM
  #17  
Mike@Tech Division's Avatar
Mike@Tech Division
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 436
Likes: 2
From: Garden Grove, CA
Originally Posted by WayMotorWorks

I've also seen this so if you need a matching piston to that one I've got it
Sweet, I'll be that much closer to an entire engine with 95% leakage
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2011 | 09:59 PM
  #18  
ThumperMCS's Avatar
ThumperMCS
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 19
From: OC, CA
It's exactly how mine broke! 52k....tuned for nearly 30k and about 10k on a JCW turbo.



FWIW...there is a variety of cars that have seen this failure. Stock boost levels and high boost.....high boost just speeds up the inevitable, I would not imply that high boost is the sole cause of it.

Did you guys happen to check the piston to cylinder wall clearance at all? I've heard this might be part of the problem........... and it also explains a lot as to why some of these motors devour oil....
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 02:04 AM
  #19  
Kev_KB's Avatar
Kev_KB
1st Gear
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ThumperMCS
Did you guys happen to check the piston to cylinder wall clearance at all? I've heard this might be part of the problem........... and it also explains a lot as to why some of these motors devour oil....
Care to elaborate on this for a non techie? Mine has an oil addiction...
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 02:46 AM
  #20  
Mike@Tech Division's Avatar
Mike@Tech Division
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 436
Likes: 2
From: Garden Grove, CA
Originally Posted by ThumperMCS
FWIW...there is a variety of cars that have seen this failure. Stock boost levels and high boost.....high boost just speeds up the inevitable, I would not imply that high boost is the sole cause of it.

Did you guys happen to check the piston to cylinder wall clearance at all? I've heard this might be part of the problem........... and it also explains a lot as to why some of these motors devour oil....
There are other inherent problems with the R56, but most would not cause this type of failure. This is text book pressure failure. With out any other signs of abnormal wear on the cylinder walls, the piston skirts, bearing ect there is no other real reason for this to happen, especially when the engine saw 8+ psi over it's intended design.

The design of the piston is not ideally suited for boost really. The diamond head shape makes the rotating assembly light but also leaves a large gap under the ring lands. The direct injection is the only reason it works with the C/R it runs and would most likely fail at 7-8 PSI with port injection. It serves it's intended purpose well enough with all things considered so it's not entirely junk, but it's certainly not as strong as conventional designs.

Given the high volume the R56 was produced I'm not shocked some have failed the same way at stock boost, so I see the validity in stating this may or may not have happens on it's own. I would just find it oddly coincidental it let go after a tune that increased it to 20 psi.
 

Last edited by Mike@Tech Division; Jun 9, 2011 at 04:03 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 03:04 AM
  #21  
orangecrush's Avatar
orangecrush
6th Gear
iTrader: (37)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,782
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte, NC.
That’s scary since I’ve seen 23 psi on mine. Though I haven’t checked it, I think the tune I’m running now is even more (it may not be, it just makes a lot more power)

I gotta figure out what to do.. .because the other tune I have does run 23 (on spike)

Mark
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 03:07 AM
  #22  
Mike@Tech Division's Avatar
Mike@Tech Division
Thread Starter
|
Former Vendor
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 436
Likes: 2
From: Garden Grove, CA
Originally Posted by Kev_KB
Care to elaborate on this for a non techie? Mine has an oil addiction...

If the cylinder is too much bigger then piston then the gaps in the rings will be increased beyond a tolerable spec. This has the potential to pull oil into the combustion chamber and burn it off. Excessive gap can cause other issues like blow by, lack of power, blue/black smoke from the exhaust, and noise from piston slap.

At what rate is yours losing oil?
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 04:03 AM
  #23  
czar's Avatar
czar
4th Gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 506
Likes: 30
From: UK
This piston has not just failed from excess boost pressure, there are a number of factors here to the failure, there is lots of excess thermal stress to that failed piston, poor tier gas is terrible for creating high thermal shock loadings (detonation/pinking) this combined with increased boost (heat) plays a detrimental catastrophic failure as we all see here!

HEAT is a killer of all engines!

Mike can we please see more images, piston crown, under the piston crown, the gudgeon pin, etc etc, you know what I'm saying.

Here is another example.

 

Last edited by czar; Jun 9, 2011 at 04:20 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 04:44 AM
  #24  
countryboyshane's Avatar
countryboyshane
6th Gear
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,568
Likes: 8
From: Bloomfield, MI
Of course you know a certain highly known company tested all their 22+psi boost maps for the R56 S engine with great success They will never stop using their customers as guinea pigs. I know you're not pointing out them directly, but with all their advertising about "Stage 3" maps with this dangerous amounts of boost in an R56 S non-JCW car people need to be more informed about why this is a really stupid idea. The failure won't be immediate, but when it comes boy I hope you've worked a lot of over time!
 
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 07:10 AM
  #25  
WayMotorWorks's Avatar
WayMotorWorks
Vendor
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,622
Likes: 804
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by Mike@Tech Division
Sweet, I'll be that much closer to an entire engine with 95% leakage
Underachiever we can get 100%
 
__________________

HOTCHKIS | DDM | CRAVEN | AKRAPOVIC | NM ENGINEERING | MEGAN | FORGE | OS GIKEN | POWERFLEX and more


Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:29 AM.