1st Gen Countryman (R60) Talk (2010-2015) R60 Countryman Discussions

R60 Goodby '06 MCS. Hello '13 All4 Countryman S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2013 | 09:05 PM
  #1  
JRZYMINI's Avatar
JRZYMINI
Thread Starter
|
5th Gear
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 602
Likes: 1
From: Verona, NJ
Goodby '06 MCS. Hello '13 All4 Countryman S

Been awhile since I've posted.... Just came to terms on a 2013 CMS All4. Trading my much loved '06 MCS with only 55k miles. Anyone else make a switch like this? Thoughts?
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2013 | 09:44 PM
  #2  
FredoinSF's Avatar
FredoinSF
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 8
From: France and Reno/Tahoe
I had both. The CM was gone in 18 months, the R53 is still in the garage.

The CM is a good practical car but does not have the charm and quirkiness of the R53.

Not sure if you're getting a manual or automatic, but the clutch was the reason I ditched the CM. 30 years of driving stick shifts, 25 of which have been in San Francisco and the CM is the only car I have ever hated with a manual. It could not even go up certain streets. If you're in the flatlands, probably will never notice, but if you have stop and go on steep grades, get the automatic.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2013 | 11:04 PM
  #3  
3leafz's Avatar
3leafz
2nd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
I just sold my 2010 clubman yesterday. I have it since was new in 2010. Had only put 15k miles on it. In exchange, I ordered my jcw CM in June. Should be expecting delivery late July.

Lucky u for to drive ur CM now! I am very jealous!!!

Congrat btw!
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2013 | 11:28 PM
  #4  
musamini2's Avatar
musamini2
2nd Gear
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Traded in our 05 MCS for a 13 CMS and are loving it. We also have a 13 MCS convertible. They are totally different cars and not just in size but also handling. We all know that the CMS is slower in acceleration in comparison to the MCS (due to the extra weight). The suspension and steering on the CMS is much less tight. It takes away some of the fun factor but the advantage is that it can be tolerated better on long trips because its a softer ride. Of course having 4 doors and a larger cargo area make this a much more practical car. It's nice to have a car that's a real head-turner and practical at the same time.
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2013 | 03:50 AM
  #5  
ASKtheteach's Avatar
ASKtheteach
5th Gear
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 73
I had a 2006 R50, and then a 2010 R56 (non-S). I traded the R56 in March for a 2012 CPO Countryman (also non-S).

There are differences for sure. A little more body roll (but nothing extreme), and the seating position is higher. Even though the Countryman is still a very small car (it's the size of a VW Golf, really), it feels huge at first when compared to the other MINIs. However, you get used to it quickly and you will find that the Countryman is every bit a MINI. It's very tossable and has lots of MINI charm and character. The non-S cars do not have the reliability issues that the S models have. They're somewhat slower off the line, but once moving, the handling is the same (same suspensions unless you get a JCW). I got mine with an automatic, because my wife does not like to drive a manual, and I often get stuck in stop and go traffic. It's still lots of fun, and very much a "real" MINI (because you'll hear some knuckle draggers try to argue otherwise).
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2013 | 06:34 AM
  #6  
MIminiclubman's Avatar
MIminiclubman
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 810
Likes: 63
From: South Central Pennsylvania
Missed my Clubbie S I had put 55K for about a day. I love my CM.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
molala
MINIs & Minis for Sale
1
Oct 2, 2015 01:53 PM
HJCPmeek
1st Gen Countryman (R60) Talk (2010-2015)
5
Sep 15, 2015 01:59 PM
ECSTuning
Vendor Announcements
0
Sep 10, 2015 10:52 AM
ECSTuning
Vendor Classifieds
0
Sep 2, 2015 01:10 PM
ECSTuning
Drivetrain Products
0
Sep 2, 2015 01:08 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:13 PM.