R56 Can I rev my car into the red zone?
Bouncing off the rev-limiter is a bad thing, and besides: it sounds awful.
well since every engine has it's own individual specific power output and power band, why don't you just get your car dyno'd and then you'll find out you ideal shift point, which won't be in the "red" but around 5500rpm.
There was a thread similar to this a while back, and I'm amazed this from time to time comes up.
Why in the world would you want to? The engineers who designed the car specifically put that in as a warning, and with new computer systems can even help prevent it.
I"ll give the same comment I gave in the other thread, that doing it just to see what will happen is kind of like hitting yourself with a hammer to see if it will hurt.
Why in the world would you want to? The engineers who designed the car specifically put that in as a warning, and with new computer systems can even help prevent it.
I"ll give the same comment I gave in the other thread, that doing it just to see what will happen is kind of like hitting yourself with a hammer to see if it will hurt.
I'm actually concerned with accidently red-lining when I'm a bit tired but still fighting traffic and I hit the wrong paddle on the paddle shifter for a second. Obviously the RPM(s) [parenthesis indicate a spoken, but not written, s] jump when I do that. I don't know if they hit the red zone, but it always makes me nervous.
So, it would be more apt to compare this process to accidently hitting yourself with a hammer because it slips out of your grasp.
In a previous thread where I made the same comment the OP basically said he wanted to try it in his driveway just to see what happened. That was more in line with my comment here in this thread. I can see a more realistic situation of a auto trans shift error, or in a race as stated, but to do it just for the sake of doing it, seems a little strange, hence my comment.
It was this thread: https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...wn-engine.html
It was this thread: https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...wn-engine.html
Last edited by glangford; Dec 11, 2008 at 09:36 AM.
In other threads, I've seen inadvertant shifting into the wrong gear (usually with a manual transmission) and overrevving the engine called a "money shift" because it is so expensive to rebuild the engine. I suggest you try to avoid it, even with an automatic.
Because I am perfect, this has never been a problem for me...
Because I am perfect, this has never been a problem for me...
[
According to miniusa.com, the MINI auto has a system to keep this from happening:
"And don't worry, the intelligent automatic transmission is always on duty to take over if you forget to shift or try and rev it too high while in the midst of an exceptionally challenging stretch of road."
I think it is safe to assume this feature will work on a typical stretch of road as well as an exceptionally challenging bit, but it doesn't say anything explicitly about downshifting.
Anyone have an reason to think that the AISIN auto will keep you from downshifting from 4th at 5500 RPM into 3rd? Anyone had an experience like that?
In other threads, I've seen inadvertant shifting into the wrong gear (usually with a manual transmission) and overrevving the engine called a "money shift" because it is so expensive to rebuild the engine. I suggest you try to avoid it, even with an automatic.
Because I am perfect, this has never been a problem for me...
Because I am perfect, this has never been a problem for me...
"And don't worry, the intelligent automatic transmission is always on duty to take over if you forget to shift or try and rev it too high while in the midst of an exceptionally challenging stretch of road."
I think it is safe to assume this feature will work on a typical stretch of road as well as an exceptionally challenging bit, but it doesn't say anything explicitly about downshifting.
Anyone have an reason to think that the AISIN auto will keep you from downshifting from 4th at 5500 RPM into 3rd? Anyone had an experience like that?
In other threads, I've seen inadvertant shifting into the wrong gear (usually with a manual transmission) and overrevving the engine called a "money shift" because it is so expensive to rebuild the engine. I suggest you try to avoid it, even with an automatic.
Because I am perfect, this has never been a problem for me...
Because I am perfect, this has never been a problem for me...
Or, more likely, with a stick, I was able to figure out that it was in the wrong gear as I was releasing the clutch, re-clutch, and then get it into the right gear, avoiding the RPM bounce.
I'm actually concerned with accidently red-lining when I'm a bit tired but still fighting traffic and I hit the wrong paddle on the paddle shifter for a second. Obviously the RPM(s) [parenthesis indicate a spoken, but not written, s] jump when I do that. I don't know if they hit the red zone, but it always makes me nervous.
No doubt my automatic transmission contributes to my perfection...
But what happens if I should be stupid enough to be tooling along in 5th gear at 85 mph or so (using manual shift) and try to downshift three or four times in rapid succession? The transmission's computer (or whatever) would prevent RsPM (revolutions per minute) above 6500?
But what happens if I should be stupid enough to be tooling along in 5th gear at 85 mph or so (using manual shift) and try to downshift three or four times in rapid succession? The transmission's computer (or whatever) would prevent RsPM (revolutions per minute) above 6500?
The auto does not predict when I'm going to need extra horse power for maintaining my following distance... at least not as acurately as I'd like. In the traffic in which I drive, one must maintain less-then-a-car length distance in stop-and-go traffic if one wants to minimize the number of cars that cut in front of them... as these cars often then do not maintain a less-then-a-car-length distance, allowing other cars to cut in front of them, and so on, until there are no parking spots available on my street and dinner is cold.
I usually down-shift in the 1.5-2k RPM range, rather than the >1-1.5k RPM the auto chooses.
As long as the engine is warm there is hardly any damage done by revving the engine into the red zone. You would want to this in autocross-type events when it is faster to keep the car in 2nd gear and have it bounce off the rev-limiter than is to shift to 3rd and then immediately back down to 2nd for a corner.
And, based upon my experiences, the MCS hits the rev-limiter at around 6700-6800 rpm.
And, based upon my experiences, the MCS hits the rev-limiter at around 6700-6800 rpm.
The engine can handle the revs to red line...it is designed to go there. There rev limiter is there to damage. If revving to red line would damage the engine Mini would be replacing many motors.I will say revving a cold engine is a NO NO...don't do it. The engine needs to up to temprature. Also free revving does put some more stress on the motor but still won't damage the engine. As MpowerF1 stated if you track or SCCA you pretty much bounce off the limiter most of the way around the track...most do.
Question: I hit the rev limiter today (first time) and the fuel cut and I quickly shifted gears but now I have a CEL on the one with the engine that is filled half yellow... any ideas? did it come on becuase of the fuel cuting off? how do i reset it? :(
So, what is up with the "red zone" on your tachometer? I've always thought that you should not rev the car up into the red zone, but I guess I've seen it done on television and movies.
I revved my Saab into the red once, and maybe past it, and then the engine kind of cut-out for a second. I think this is/was a safety feature... or maybe that was the beginning of the troubles I ended up having with the engine.
So, to make this germaine to this forum, is it safe to rev my 09 Mini Cooper S up into the red zone on the tachometer? What are the concers with "red lining" a car, specifically to engine wear?
Looking forward to hearing your answers!
I revved my Saab into the red once, and maybe past it, and then the engine kind of cut-out for a second. I think this is/was a safety feature... or maybe that was the beginning of the troubles I ended up having with the engine.
So, to make this germaine to this forum, is it safe to rev my 09 Mini Cooper S up into the red zone on the tachometer? What are the concers with "red lining" a car, specifically to engine wear?
Looking forward to hearing your answers!
MINI puts an artificially low limit on the car to preserve reliability and hold down on its warranty costs.
Reving to redline should not bring up a CEL.
To all you young folks: Back in the old days when there was no rev limiter to cut either spark or fuel to an engine it was easy to go into the red zone. However, if held there for more than a few seconds the valves would "float" (i.e., would not close due to the speed of opening and closing) and in many cases a piston and valve would collide and goodbye engine. I say this from experience and a very expensive mistake.
[FONT=Arial]I have not worked on an engine in a long time and have never worked on a MINI. But back in the days when I worked on 1960 & 70’s Corvettes, what almost always happened in an over-rev situation was that the valve train failed. The valve train cannot keep up with the high rpm of the engine and the valves fail to follow the camshaft. When that occurs, one or more valves will contact a piston causing some slight damage or it starts a cascade of damage that will eventually trash all of the rotating internal parts of the engine. If your engine fails and there is no evidence of valve train damage? It was not an over-rev. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial] [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial]The other problem is that the oil pump is working so fast that it pumps all of the oil up into the engine. The connecting rods and crankshaft do not actually ride directly on the bearing material. They ride on a film of oil provided by oil pressure by way of the oil pump. So, if there is no oil left for the pump to pump, their is no oil pressure and you get bearing to metal contact, and that is not good! You never want to have bearing to metal contact without lubrication pressure or things heat up and break in a hurry![/FONT]
[FONT=Arial] [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial]The other problem is that the oil pump is working so fast that it pumps all of the oil up into the engine. The connecting rods and crankshaft do not actually ride directly on the bearing material. They ride on a film of oil provided by oil pressure by way of the oil pump. So, if there is no oil left for the pump to pump, their is no oil pressure and you get bearing to metal contact, and that is not good! You never want to have bearing to metal contact without lubrication pressure or things heat up and break in a hurry![/FONT]
Some comments on the nature of wear...
for normal wear, it goes with the square of the velocity... So double the speed and quadrouple the wear. So running engines faster tends to wear then out faster. But one or two (or even many) rev excursions isn't really that big a deal.
Modern electric fuel systems don't fire one of the injectors to limit engine torque at read line, and this is why the car sounds funny. It doesn't hurt anything. It may stop firing two or more injection events per two crank revolutions if the engine doesn't stop speeding up (this would be the case of the guy who wanted to do it in his driveway...)
The R53 valve train and rotating assemblies have been tested to do pretty well to speed a bit above 7000, then the debate opens up as to when valve foat is a problem. FWIW, if you're building a head to go above that RPM, then a good head building will look at the cam profile, planned red-line and valve construction to select a spring that will keep the valve train "tight" but not much stronger than that... It just wastes HP and increases wear to have to strong a valve spring.
For non-normal wear and tear, this is where the fast damage occurs. There are the floating valve/piston top collisions that a previous poster mentioned, but in theory you can also have events where parts go past the limit of plastic deformation, and they streatch or break. This is possible, but rare, and usually very expsensive.
Matt
Modern electric fuel systems don't fire one of the injectors to limit engine torque at read line, and this is why the car sounds funny. It doesn't hurt anything. It may stop firing two or more injection events per two crank revolutions if the engine doesn't stop speeding up (this would be the case of the guy who wanted to do it in his driveway...)
The R53 valve train and rotating assemblies have been tested to do pretty well to speed a bit above 7000, then the debate opens up as to when valve foat is a problem. FWIW, if you're building a head to go above that RPM, then a good head building will look at the cam profile, planned red-line and valve construction to select a spring that will keep the valve train "tight" but not much stronger than that... It just wastes HP and increases wear to have to strong a valve spring.
For non-normal wear and tear, this is where the fast damage occurs. There are the floating valve/piston top collisions that a previous poster mentioned, but in theory you can also have events where parts go past the limit of plastic deformation, and they streatch or break. This is possible, but rare, and usually very expsensive.
Matt





