R55 :: Clubman Talk (2008+) Discussions revolving around the extended wheelbase Clubman (R55) model.

R55 What is the point to the Clubman?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 09:59 PM
  #1  
CapWKidd's Avatar
CapWKidd
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
What is the point to the Clubman?

Ok, I guess I have not been around here much lately, it would appear this thing is being sold.... did not see one at my local Mini dealer... are they out yet? What is the point to this thing? Is this for people thay actually want to be able to use the back seat (because the current Mini, you pretty much move the seat all but 2" from the back seat, so no one can sit back there)? Is the overal length more? Isn't there allot more weight in the back? Doesn't this kill the performance? I guess this would provide more stereo space :>
 

Last edited by CapWKidd; Nov 24, 2007 at 10:05 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #2  
tazio's Avatar
tazio
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 3
From: Right here
I will attempt to answer your questions, in order:

They are on display at auto shows, but have not been released for sale in the US yet.
Improved profitability for BMW Group AG.
Yes.
Yes.
175 pounds more weight, but not all behind the rear wheels.
No.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 11:04 PM
  #3  
Mugami's Avatar
Mugami
Coordinator :: River City Minis
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
Yep Tazio covered it all
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 12:40 AM
  #4  
markjenn's Avatar
markjenn
5th Gear
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 779
Likes: 4
Early reports are that it is difficult to tell you are in the larger car from the driver's seat; performance is down but not by much - it's about the same as adding a passenger to the coupe. In return for this slight reduction in performance, you get a very useable back seat. Sounds like a pretty good tradeoff to me.

- Mark
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 04:32 AM
  #5  
Speedwing's Avatar
Speedwing
4th Gear
15 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
From: Southeast PA
The mini third door also makes rear seat access much, much, better.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 07:03 AM
  #6  
Lawman's Avatar
Lawman
1st Gear
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: North Jersey
I'll throw one back at you.....What's the point of our current MINIs? As with any car development, it's called the evolution of progress for your 25" sub-woofer! I think the Clubman is kind of cool. The official sale date for the U.S. is not until sometime in February 08.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 07:23 AM
  #7  
itburns's Avatar
itburns
2nd Gear
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Sales, marketing.

LA Auto Show ends today, They have 4 at the show, 3 you can get in. They seem to be very popular at the show.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 04:53 PM
  #8  
peestandingup's Avatar
peestandingup
1st Gear
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Well, I'll tell you this. To me, there was no point in the MINI Cooper. I always loved the Cooper, but would have never considered one because it just isn't practical for a primary car (for most people). And I dont have the luxury of owning a "play" weekend car. I think MINI saw that there were A LOT of people like me who wanted one, but couldnt bring themselves to do it for those very reasons.

The performance hit for the Clubman is minimal, but the benefits are grand.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 08:14 PM
  #9  
CapWKidd's Avatar
CapWKidd
Thread Starter
|
4th Gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Not practical for a primary car? Why is that? Oh wait, you are going to say something about families, kids.... I know nothing of that :>

Originally Posted by peestandingup
Well, I'll tell you this. To me, there was no point in the MINI Cooper. I always loved the Cooper, but would have never considered one because it just isn't practical for a primary car (for most people). And I dont have the luxury of owning a "play" weekend car. I think MINI saw that there were A LOT of people like me who wanted one, but couldnt bring themselves to do it for those very reasons.

The performance hit for the Clubman is minimal, but the benefits are grand.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 09:14 PM
  #10  
edbear67's Avatar
edbear67
2nd Gear
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: So. Cal
It's so those folks with the baby carseats don't have to do 3 yoga poses before they can put the little baby in.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 09:49 PM
  #11  
jupiterfish's Avatar
jupiterfish
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: northern michigan
its MINI for me and my 2yr old. hes getting to heavy to toss in the back. that door was made for my my son. almost like magic.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 09:54 PM
  #12  
peestandingup's Avatar
peestandingup
1st Gear
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by CapWKidd
Not practical for a primary car? Why is that? Oh wait, you are going to say something about families, kids.... I know nothing of that :>
Well, no. I dont have any kids either. "Practical" meaning just the way it sounds. You cant haul much in the Coopers, you cant fit passengers easily in the back, getting in & out for them is a pain, not much legroom for everyone, etc. Now, if you dont have passengers very often & dont wanna haul things besides groceries & such, then the Cooper will suit those people just fine for their main car.

The Clubman isn't a "family car" by any means (but I suppose it COULD be). Its just not so much of a PITA to own as a primary car compared to the Cooper for most people. And it is nice to know that if you DO decide to knock your women up, you wont have to sell the thing like so many Cooper owners do.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 10:32 PM
  #13  
mauberley's Avatar
mauberley
6th Gear
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,396
Likes: 0
From: H-bar-on-two
Originally Posted by peestandingup
Well, no. I dont have any kids either. "Practical" meaning just the way it sounds. You cant haul much in the Coopers, you cant fit passengers easily in the back, getting in & out for them is a pain, not much legroom for everyone, etc. Now, if you dont have passengers very often & dont wanna haul things besides groceries & such, then the Cooper will suit those people just fine for their main car.
In fact, you might call the Cooper "practical" for those people. And there are quite a few of those people out there.

The MINI is "practical" for me because it has sufficient cargo space when I need it (by folding down the rear seats) and yet can squeeze into street parking spots other cars could not fit into.

I don't doubt that you did not find the Cooper practical for you, but there is a big can of worms associated with declaring it "impractical for most people" around these parts...
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #14  
MINIclo's Avatar
MINIclo
7th Gear Gal
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 36,087
Likes: 3
From: Weeblegabber West (aka WLA)
Originally Posted by mauberley
The MINI is "practical" for me because it has sufficient cargo space when I need it (by folding down the rear seats) and yet can squeeze into street parking spots other cars could not fit into.

I don't doubt that you did not find the Cooper practical for you, but there is a big can of worms associated with declaring it "impractical for most people" around these parts...
I went from an Isuzu Trooper as my daily driver to a MINI Cooper 5 years ago. I can get LOTS of stuff in my MINI! I live out of it every spring for my annual two-month road trip. It is truly amazing how much I can pack and still have full visibility.

I was fortunate enough to participate in a market research survey in January 2006 which required me to sit in a new Clubman (called "Project X" by the survey folks ), front seats and back. The coach door (the cool little third door on the passenger side) will make using the backseat much more practical, and as edbear67 said, won't require 3 yoga poses to enable loading a child's carseat.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 12:21 AM
  #15  
eVal's Avatar
eVal
6th Gear
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,802
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Originally Posted by mauberley
The MINI is "practical" for me because it has sufficient cargo space when I need it (by folding down the rear seats) and yet can squeeze into street parking spots other cars could not fit into.
Exactly, what would be impractical is a Mini the same too long length as other cars that cannot fit in those little between drive way spaces in SF And it is true the current Mini can hold a lot of stuff, its been our primary hauler for some time (although the M Coupe could also hold a surprising amount in its little breadvan hatch ). Guess it boils down to using the back seat a bunch.

I'll have to test drive one to verify any conjecture it handles like the mini Mini - also curious to see how much space the cargo van rear doors need to open.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 01:35 AM
  #16  
OrionLTD's Avatar
OrionLTD
3rd Gear
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: Victorville, CA
I checked out the clubman at the LA auto show. I noticed that there is not a heck of a lot more legroom for the back seat. If you pull the front seats all the way back, you are still scrunched. There is more Boot room and the third door gives you better access. I don't really see the advantages for me and I like the shorter footprint of the mini.
Another bad thing for me is that Mellow Yellow was not on the configurator

I saw a JCW MY MCS at the show as well. Now that car looked fast and sexy! I'll have to remember that when I buy my next mini in 5 years
All in all, I love my 3 week old MC! 2400 miles and counting!
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 07:54 AM
  #17  
Greatbear's Avatar
Greatbear
Moderator :: Performance Mods
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,427
Likes: 8
From: A Den in Maryland
Because wagons are cool.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 08:03 AM
  #18  
COOP310's Avatar
COOP310
5th Gear
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 2
From: Florida
Originally Posted by edbear67
It's so those folks with the baby carseats don't have to do 3 yoga poses before they can put the little baby in.
When I had the rear-facing car seat, it was really easy! I had her in the backseat in about 5 seconds each time! Now the front facing, that may be more difficult.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 10:29 AM
  #19  
humcmcel's Avatar
humcmcel
4th Gear
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 309
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by peestandingup
Well, I'll tell you this. To me, there was no point in the MINI Cooper. I always loved the Cooper, but would have never considered one because it just isn't practical for a primary car (for most people)....
My Cooper is my primary car and since it's just me back an forth to work most days it's very practical. My other car is a 11 year old GMC 1/2 ton that only gets about 18-20 mpg, so it sits most days while the cooper is out running with 30-35mpg. If you look at the drivers commuting to work I expect a good 50% could easily get away with a smaller car.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 12:31 PM
  #20  
ScottRiqui's Avatar
ScottRiqui
OVERDRIVE
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 8
From: Norfolk, VA
^+1

If you can only have *one* vehicle, and it has to handle *everything* you might ever need to do, no matter how infrequently, then a MINI might not be practical. My wife and I both have MINIs as our everyday cars without undue burden, though.

But, we also have a 25-year old Dodge 4X4 that gets used about a half-dozen times per year for things like trips to the landfill and bringing home really large purchases that won't fit in a convertible MINI with the top down.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 02:18 PM
  #21  
MotorMouth's Avatar
MotorMouth
6th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,821
Likes: 6
From: Mililani,Hawaii
Please tell us what you think about miatas, porsches, etc... I wouldn't call 'em practical but they sell buttloads of them. The MINI is practically a SUV compared to those.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 02:29 PM
  #22  
miniemee's Avatar
miniemee
3rd Gear
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
I like the Clubman concept. If it had been available in feb of this year, I would have bought it. The reviews indicate that the extra length improved the ride without destroying the handling.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #23  
TheBigNewt's Avatar
TheBigNewt
OVERDRIVE
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,602
Likes: 107
From: Arizona
The backseat of the Mini is adequate for an adult if the seat is about halfway up, I just did this recently. With 3 inches of extra legroom in the Clubman it should be way better. 3 inches doesn't sound like much, but could make the difference between comfortable and scrunched to a backseat passenger. If I used the back seat much at all I'd get it.
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 05:02 AM
  #24  
ksmaas1's Avatar
ksmaas1
2nd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 98
Likes: 2
From: Central NJ
We have a a 2002 MCS and a 2002 MC, and on occasion stuff just won't fit, but it's close. I think the clubby is going to be our answer to just that little bit more space so I don't have to drag out the old Suburban at 10mpg. We use the 'burban about 6 to 8 times a year for the really big stuff and to tow a trailer. No way do I want to drive that to work 75 miles each day. The MINI is the perfect practicle commuter car for us. Most of the time it's just me, so I could even consider something smaller and more fuel efficient as practicle if there was anything as fun to drive (forget the Smart car and it's funny trans). But there isn't.
 
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 05:12 AM
  #25  
Yucca Patrol's Avatar
Yucca Patrol
Coordinator :: Alabama Motoring Society & South East
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 2
From: Burning-Ham Alabama
There are several important points to the Clubman.

1) To pave the way for Hummer-sized MINI SUV's while diluting the brand image
2) To further anger and incite the R50/R53 purists
3) To appeal to a mass market that is not as cool and special as we are.



If we were in the market for another MINI for my wife, we'd get a clubman in a heartbeat.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:37 PM.