Drivetrain Those running the 1320 / Cat cam, Idle RPM?
#1
#2
#5
#6
I think I figured out my issue with a little research.
I found 2 cases over in the UK and 1 here in the US where a pre-facelift Bosch DME (EMS 2000) does not do well with bigger cams at idle even with tuning. It seems to be a very rare thing and since the tunes were all done by a few different tuners on cars with very similar mods.
My theory is that the the original DME software version may have something to do with it as tuning software changes certain maps and perimeters but not the basic algorithms of how the ECU works. If the DME had an older (or factory) version of software rather than the latest update from the dealer that may be the answer?
All the cars switched up to the Siemens EMS 5150 and the idle issue went away. (I'm also going to try this to test my theory)
I would be interested in listing off all known CAL ID (OEM software ID code) to see how many different versions are floating around for both EMS 2000 and EMS 5150 also.
I found 2 cases over in the UK and 1 here in the US where a pre-facelift Bosch DME (EMS 2000) does not do well with bigger cams at idle even with tuning. It seems to be a very rare thing and since the tunes were all done by a few different tuners on cars with very similar mods.
My theory is that the the original DME software version may have something to do with it as tuning software changes certain maps and perimeters but not the basic algorithms of how the ECU works. If the DME had an older (or factory) version of software rather than the latest update from the dealer that may be the answer?
All the cars switched up to the Siemens EMS 5150 and the idle issue went away. (I'm also going to try this to test my theory)
I would be interested in listing off all known CAL ID (OEM software ID code) to see how many different versions are floating around for both EMS 2000 and EMS 5150 also.
#7
maybe you just need a better tuner?
__________________
http://store-revolutionmini-com.3dcartstores.com
http://store-revolutionmini-com.3dcartstores.com
Trending Topics
#8
From above post- "Tuning can't change the basic idle strategy algorithm in the DME, you can only change basic values."
In changing values you may be able to work around the algorithm and get the car to function but that's not the way I like to handle things. I would rather find the best software that MINI had come up with and have that available to tuners like yourself and others so the customers end up with the best tune you can supply.
During my research I looked at a few maps and logs from a few of US tuners even some from the offshore that were nice enough to send me theirs.
What I was looking for was how each tuner handled the idle strategy. Most of the data I looked at as far as tuning had a lot of commonalities as far as how and where adjustments were made but you can definitely see each tuners "style". The data also showed me that the way the DME was handling things changed with certain CAL IDs even though the values set by the tuner were nearly identical.
Knowing the R53 had a history of idle and drivability issues when they were stock and that MINI had updated the software more than a few times, the point of my post was to say maybe we should collect the CAL IDs for the US market and make a list so we can narrow down when MINI changed certain things to further help the community.
The following users liked this post:
Bearybee (09-18-2018)
#9
I think I figured out my issue with a little research.
I found 2 cases over in the UK and 1 here in the US where a pre-facelift Bosch DME (EMS 2000) does not do well with bigger cams at idle even with tuning. It seems to be a very rare thing and since the tunes were all done by a few different tuners on cars with very similar mods.
My theory is that the the original DME software version may have something to do with it as tuning software changes certain maps and perimeters but not the basic algorithms of how the ECU works. If the DME had an older (or factory) version of software rather than the latest update from the dealer that may be the answer?
All the cars switched up to the Siemens EMS 5150 and the idle issue went away. (I'm also going to try this to test my theory)
I would be interested in listing off all known CAL ID (OEM software ID code) to see how many different versions are floating around for both EMS 2000 and EMS 5150 also.
I found 2 cases over in the UK and 1 here in the US where a pre-facelift Bosch DME (EMS 2000) does not do well with bigger cams at idle even with tuning. It seems to be a very rare thing and since the tunes were all done by a few different tuners on cars with very similar mods.
My theory is that the the original DME software version may have something to do with it as tuning software changes certain maps and perimeters but not the basic algorithms of how the ECU works. If the DME had an older (or factory) version of software rather than the latest update from the dealer that may be the answer?
All the cars switched up to the Siemens EMS 5150 and the idle issue went away. (I'm also going to try this to test my theory)
I would be interested in listing off all known CAL ID (OEM software ID code) to see how many different versions are floating around for both EMS 2000 and EMS 5150 also.
#11
#12
This was only an issue in a few ECU's, scattered across different years, unfortunately there's no way to tell unless you try it.
Last edited by BlwnAway; 07-28-2018 at 05:01 PM.
#13
#14
From my experience the issues manifested in different ways, depending on the Cam.
With my first two Cams (NS-1 and MegaMini) the car wouldn't WOT throttle without throwing misfire codes in differing cylinders.
This last Cam (Thumpers Mid Range) the problem manifested itself with a surging Idle.
With my first two Cams (NS-1 and MegaMini) the car wouldn't WOT throttle without throwing misfire codes in differing cylinders.
This last Cam (Thumpers Mid Range) the problem manifested itself with a surging Idle.
#15
Let me add, while the VDO ECU cleared up my issue immediately upon install, this may not necessarily be the case with everyone having these Cam issues.
For me, it just showed that the issues were in my ECU, and possibly even any different ECU could have cleared things up.
The benefit to the VDO ECU besides the factory updates in the ECU itself, it offers better fine tuning adjustments in the areas of the mapping where it matters.
For me, it just showed that the issues were in my ECU, and possibly even any different ECU could have cleared things up.
The benefit to the VDO ECU besides the factory updates in the ECU itself, it offers better fine tuning adjustments in the areas of the mapping where it matters.
#16
#17
Let me add, while the VDO ECU cleared up my issue immediately upon install, this may not necessarily be the case with everyone having these Cam issues.
For me, it just showed that the issues were in my ECU, and possibly even any different ECU could have cleared things up.
The benefit to the VDO ECU besides the factory updates in the ECU itself, it offers better fine tuning adjustments in the areas of the mapping where it matters.
For me, it just showed that the issues were in my ECU, and possibly even any different ECU could have cleared things up.
The benefit to the VDO ECU besides the factory updates in the ECU itself, it offers better fine tuning adjustments in the areas of the mapping where it matters.
#19
#20
#21
-You datalog a manner of driving specified by them. (Idle, Wot, light acceleration)
-e-mail them that log file
-they e-mail you backa new tune file to upload to the car
-you then datalog that tune
This process is repeated until the tuning is complete.
-or
Schedule a specific time with the tuner, and a dyno, to have it all done in one day
While the process will differ slightly between tuners, this is basically how all remote tunes are done.
My preference has always been road tuning, even though it takes longer, it gives you real world conditions with temp, air follow and drag.
#22
It opens you up to their remote tuning options.
-You datalog a manner of driving specified by them. (Idle, Wot, light acceleration)
-e-mail them that log file
-they e-mail you backa new tune file to upload to the car
-you then datalog that tune
This process is repeated until the tuning is complete.
-or
Schedule a specific time with the tuner, and a dyno, to have it all done in one day
While the process will differ slightly between tuners, this is basically how all remote tunes are done.
My preference has always been road tuning, even though it takes longer, it gives you real world conditions with temp, air follow and drag.
-You datalog a manner of driving specified by them. (Idle, Wot, light acceleration)
-e-mail them that log file
-they e-mail you backa new tune file to upload to the car
-you then datalog that tune
This process is repeated until the tuning is complete.
-or
Schedule a specific time with the tuner, and a dyno, to have it all done in one day
While the process will differ slightly between tuners, this is basically how all remote tunes are done.
My preference has always been road tuning, even though it takes longer, it gives you real world conditions with temp, air follow and drag.
#23
You'd have to contact them to see exactly what is offered with what packages and options. They've been tuning for me for years, so things have changed as far as beginning the process.
#24
Yupoong - You can contact them here: https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...ytetronik.html
or here: https://www.bytetronik.com/contact/
or here: https://www.bytetronik.com/contact/
#25
Yupoong - You can contact them here: https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...ytetronik.html
or here: https://www.bytetronik.com/contact/
or here: https://www.bytetronik.com/contact/