You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
IMHO, the 2005 & 2006 models have a better tranny than earlier models. After 2006, (the end of 1st generation), the engines and body panels are different on the 2nd generation model years. In the S model, the 1st gens are super-charged and the 2nd gens are turbo-charged; again, a different design, but both gens are pretty solid from 2005 on.
__________________ BLACK PEARL: 2012 MCS Countryman/R60, AB/B, Auto, H/K Stereo, Satellite Radio, Bluetooth & USB/IPOD, Cold Weather Gone, but not forgotten: Capt'n JAC: 2006 MC/R50, BRG/S, Manual, Nav, Premium, Mud Flaps - "Hold On Loosely"
IMHO, the 2005 & 2006 models have a better tranny than earlier models.
Different ratios, but not necessarily better. The spacing is wider across the first 3 gears in the later version, and all gears have lower ratios. Basically, the later transmission took 1st and 2nd way down and 3rd+ down a bit. This gives it more "usable" gearing in stop and go city traffic, but not so for high-speed/high-rev work, especially given the wider spacing between 2nd and 3rd. If you are running even a bit more than stock torque and hp, then the earlier transmission is actually a better choice as it offers closer ratios and still gives you enough off the line grunt. (If you need off the line grunt. Which personally I do not.) For the standard ~200whp modified car, I would argue the earlier transmission is the one you want.
Here is a list of used Mini purchase questions we've collected that may help.
2006 MCS PW/B, first owner. Cofounder www.SooperCooperinfo.com-just might be the most complete first generation MINI aftermarket/DIY/independent repair shop library ever to be offered.
2003 MCS with 63,000 miles and no major issues. When I was looking I knew I did not want a 2002. Some say even 2003 models have problems that still need working out but I guess my very late production 2003 had those addressed. I personally would steer clear of any 2002-2006 standard cooper just because of the midlands transmission. I also would not want a CVT because I have read about a lot of problems with those. However any online forum will only have the people with problems posting. If a car works then the owner won't post anything because its suppose to work and thats what is expected.