|
Okay, I'm going to attempt to be civil:
As I stated in the previous posts, I respect on delivery system over another. This thread was begun on a basis of advice. What I wanted advice on was illustrated in the letter I had composed to someone else and chose to post here.
Every post recieved from you told me nothing, but tried to sell me everything. No matter how anyone can look at that, the conclusion would be the same.
Andrew took a different approach. He offered advice from his experience. He addressed the issue at hand. He did not attempt to sell me anything outright, addressed exactly what I asked, and all in all was more amicable to a constructive conversation.
It seems that in society today people expect everything they throw at you to be taken at face value with no background or explanation. Apparently Andrew comes from the old and more respectful school of actually intaking the information, identifying the problem and addressing exactly what needs to be solved.
IOW, he did the exact opposite of what you did.
You do not wish to be wrong in this, but in all candid honesty, there is no way you can be right due to the approach you elected to take, which was that of the big blustery politician who speaks as though he's smiling jack with all the solutions to your problems but never showing he had the personal experience to illustrate he actually understood your problem.
IOW, like a salesman.
I had no reason to call anyone because you gave me none, so it is not my faoult if you now feel slighted due how I elected to respond to what was laid before me in the way that I did.
Also, if you had just said in beginning to call them and exactly why, which you did elect to do in these two previous posts, I may have entertained it.
I will not take responsibility for someone elses actions.
That onus falls upon your own shoulders.
|
